It seems they have updated this data and now Germany seems to be at 3,243 recoveries. Which puts it more or less on par with France or Spain, but with much, much fewer deaths. So the mystery continues, I guess.most people are not declared as "recovered" in Germany as it's not allowed to forward these information for reasons of data privacy. Some districts still put them out themself, but obviously the total number is not accurate at all then.
The heavily affected Kreis Heinsberg for example does publish all numbers every day. So far they had 1043 infected of which 247 recovered
This isn't Indonesia, but this may give us a hint at how it will go?Indonesia tipped to be the next hot spot as little has been done in practical terms there so far to control the situation re testing and isolation policies but they have prepared a giant temporary hospital in an indoor stadium so it seems they know what to expect.
could be, yeah, it's about the number of infected we had ~10 days ago - which is exactly the time frame it takes before anyone can be considered as recovered.It seems they have updated this data and now Germany seems to be at 3,243 recoveries. Which puts it more or less on par with France or Spain, but with much, much fewer deaths. So the mystery continues, I guess.
One year ago, the Federal government did a "disaster simulation exercise" in which a fictional novel flu virus invaded the US. It had supposedly originated in China and was called the "Crimson Contagion." All the participating federal and state agencies were required to respond to developing, incomplete information in real time, as if in a real emergency. As one might expect, there were massive ***-ups, and the computer model showed that almost a million Americans died before the epidemic was controlled.
Among the lessons learned: A woeful lack of communication and coordination among agencies. Vastly insufficient capacity to test and track contacts. Huge shortages of critical medical supplies like masks and ventilators. [The report was kept] secret. The NY Times got a copy. Read it and weep.
More from my fb pal:
dirt. I did not mention any sacrifice. No idea what the F you are talking. I have never posted or even thought about sacrificing old or sick. I have no idea what you are mad about. Politics?...but the deciderers/influencers aren't framing it that way, they are essentially saying "its worth sacrificing old and/or sick people so that we can save the economy".
You have to remember Mardi Gras ? WTFHas anything we have done up to this point suggest that we will be like Japan?
Keep an eye on New Orleans. That has all the makings of another disaster. Their R naught might be lower than other places, but their problems are starting to become apparent.
Hopkins are now updating by county in the USA if people want to get the most local information.
https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html
Nor did I say that you did.dirt. I did not mention any sacrifice. No idea what the F you are talking. I have never posted or even thought about sacrificing old or sick. I have no idea what you are mad about. Politics?
WHO's Bruce Aylward was a main source for that I believe, he had trouble finding any evidence that there were many asymptomatic cases at all. Modeling suggests otherwise, so it is still a point of contention.I believe the guardian article on China above also suggests that asymptomatics aren’t the main drivers
WHO's Bruce Aylward was a main source for that I believe, he had trouble finding any evidence that there were many asymptomatic cases at all. Modeling suggests otherwise, so it is still a point of contention.
The low number of deaths is in line with an also low number of "critical/serious cases" by the way, and there are also barely any reports about hospitals working at the limit and so on (most who are infected seem to recover at home) - there were even some patients flewn in from Italy and France. So I don't know about the exact reasons of course (apart from differences in culture, few multigenerational households and so on, maybe leading to less elderly people getting in touch with the virus, compared to Italy or Spain), but I doubt it's mainly about a different way of counting, as some have assumed.
Total Cases | % | |
Age 0-4: | 230 | 0,73% |
Age 5-14: | 646 | 2,06% |
Age 15-34: | 8300 | 26,51% |
Age 35-59: | 16000 | 51,10% |
Age 60-79 | 5100 | 16,29% |
Age 80+ | 1033 | 3,30% |
Such as this outlier model:
https://www.ft.com/content/5ff6469a...egmentId=b385c2ad-87ed-d8ff-aaec-0f8435cd42d9
Edit: I accessed this before, now I can't. But this group thinks half the UK population is positive, and that the spread occurred through asymptomatics and mild symptomatics.
Don't go there. You just can't help it can you?![]()
'Tip of the iceberg': is our destruction of nature responsible for Covid-19?
As habitat and biodiversity loss increase globally, the coronavirus outbreak may be just the beginning of mass pandemicswww.google.com
Models are only as good as the assumptions that you build into them. And there is a lot of skepticism with this model. It predicts a low mortality rate, but we know that Italy (60 Million people) has lost over 7k lives. Unless the whole country has been infected, this low rate doesn't sound plausible. As mentioned before, there are legitimate points of contention on both sides of this argument.Such as this outlier model:
https://www.ft.com/content/5ff6469a...egmentId=b385c2ad-87ed-d8ff-aaec-0f8435cd42d9
Edit: I accessed this before, now I can't. But this group thinks half the UK population is positive, and that the spread occurred through asymptomatics and mild symptomatics.