The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
ricara said:American Football??!!?? WTF? What does this have to do with a classics rider winning the TdF 7 times in a row?
In the immortal words of Michael Aisner, director of the Coors Classic, "Wow -- football! I hear those players are really tough! Some of them are on the field as much as 9 minutes a game!"
That about sums it up.And now, back to our regularly scheduled programming.
flicker said:Here is my question. What kind of training program and Peds were used by Lance to transform? I am of the opinion it was from maturation, natural ability, the chemo/cancer and possibly the peds. 7 times is an outstanding acheivement. Oh I forgot his team. I guess I answered my own question. Thanks.
Benotti69 said:why is 7 outstanding when we look at his EPO use, which started with '99 and a team based PED program. They took way more than any other team as was obvious by the train.
Keep trying to deny the evidence Flicky, but as you come on here everyday and read it and then fail to counter it with statements of untruth that are part of a pr campaign on behalf on Uniballer, it is hard to see what you are trying to achieve apart from a bit of 'light' trolling.
Benotti69 said:why is 7 outstanding when we look at his EPO use, which started with '99 and a team based PED program. They took way more than any other team as was obvious by the train.
Keep trying to deny the evidence Flicky, but as you come on here everyday and read it and then fail to counter it with statements of untruth that are part of a pr campaign on behalf on Uniballer, it is hard to see what you are trying to achieve apart from a bit of 'light' trolling.
kurtinsc said:I think the idea that they took "more" then anyone else is pretty hard to substantiate.
They were doped heavily. But so were many of the other top teams. Most top teams were cheating... trying to single one out because they may have cheated more effectively seems a bit odd to me. Telekom/CSC/whoever weren't as effective at cheating... so their results were okay? I don't understand that logic.