auscyclefan94 said:Leave his points at 60. It is a bargain pick up.
Agree may have to make a couple of changes to my team to fit him in. But definitely worth it WHAT a bargain!
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
auscyclefan94 said:Leave his points at 60. It is a bargain pick up.
Moondance said:Well, Ricco and Rasmussen could be kept. They'd have the CQ scores they accumulated this year.
But I agree with Ferminal. Guys like Di Luca or Rebbelin shouldn't be 'free'
Ferminal said:If they have had half a season comeback I'm sure it would be ok. But imagine if Pellizotti was 60 points, he would be in every single team.
On my first go I managed to get 30 riders at just over 8,500, so it shouldn't be too hard cutting the additional 1,000 off.
roundabout said:I still like the suggestion of just a single rider with less than 100 points. Rules out a few (non-sanctioned) people on my shortlist but i do think that rider selection should be more of challenge than picking returning dopers or perenially injured riders who can do very well when healthy.
kurtinsc said:I'll admit I'm not exactly picking super logically. I've got 7 riders from the US... many young that probably aren't going to develop as quickly as my heart would want them to.
The Hitch said:Considering there is a pool of about 500 cyclists we have to pick from, theres bound to be loads im just forgeting today.
Parrulo said:just a question. how many points did your most valuable guy had? i didn't went for anything with more then 1k. actually my most valuable guy is a couple hundred points below the 1k mark.
Mellow Velo said:25 riders 7486 points, Most valuable one: Cavendish at 1241, too.
5 under 100, 2 dodgy..............not submitting just yet!
.......Edit 26 riders, 7496 points.