Cricket- the sport not the insect

Page 38 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jul 8, 2009
501
0
0
Genuine question, I was asked this last night by a mate at the Big Bash and didn't really have an answer.

Sachin (for example) has 51 Test centuries... but that includes, I dunno? several double tons? Why do the stats only reflect him as making a century? Shouldn't they list his double tons as being two centuries? Triples as three tons? I'm not sure what the answer is (hence the post), but thought it was an interesting question.
 
Payback for Eden Gardens.

Spider1964 said:
Genuine question, I was asked this last night by a mate at the Big Bash and didn't really have an answer.

Sachin (for example) has 51 Test centuries... but that includes, I dunno? several double tons? Why do the stats only reflect him as making a century? Shouldn't they list his double tons as being two centuries? Triples as three tons? I'm not sure what the answer is (hence the post), but thought it was an interesting question.

It's for reaching a milestone in an innings (edit this line doesn't make sense either reading it again?), not a number of runs scored. If you reach 100 it goes down as one hundred and zero fifties, not one hundred and two fifties, or one hundred and one fifty, or zero hundreds and two fifties. Anything further than 100 is still just one century as the common stats display doesn't show 150, 200 or 300. I don't think that's the answer you're looking for, I have no idea it works this way, that's just how it is, to me though it makes sense.

Now I've confused myself :p
 
Jul 8, 2009
501
0
0
Ferminal said:
Payback for Eden Gardens.



It's for reaching a milestone in an innings (edit this line doesn't make sense either reading it again?), not a number of runs scored. If you reach 100 it goes down as one hundred and zero fifties, not one hundred and two fifties, or one hundred and one fifty, or zero hundreds and two fifties. Anything further than 100 is still just one century as the common stats display doesn't show 150, 200 or 300. I don't think that's the answer you're looking for, I have no idea it works this way, that's just how it is, to me though it makes sense.

Now I've confused myself :p

Yep, I think (know) you're right, it doesn't matter how far past 100 you go, we're still going to call it a hundred. It's just the way it's always been done, so we'll keep doing it that way.

My mate is an accountant, does my taxes, surely he should know the answer to his own question about friggin numbers! Might have to sack him. ;)
 
Jul 20, 2011
619
0
0
Ferminal said:
Should have batted until just after tea imo.

Reckon they could have gone a bit longer and given him the chance to go for the record. Maybe nervous as forecast for next couple of days is mixed
 
May 6, 2009
8,522
1
0
daveinzambia said:
Reckon they could have gone a bit longer and given him the chance to go for the record. Maybe nervous as forecast for next couple of days is mixed

I'm sure the Indians hope so.
 
daveinzambia said:
Reckon they could have gone a bit longer and given him the chance to go for the record. Maybe nervous as forecast for next couple of days is mixed

Yeh, they didn't even have a real crack at scoring runs, although they lifted the tempo a little in the last 10 overs.

There was still over 200 overs left in the game, you should be expected to bowl them out for 150, giving you enough room to move for bad weather. If you lose a day to weather no one can blame you for not winning the test match. But if the weather is fine and India bat for more than 150, Australia may be tasked with 100 or so on a crumbling pitch. Better to make the runs now than then. What happens if Sehwag is 150* at stumps. I would have brought them back out after tea just to **** them off and have their openers in the field for a little longer, with that extra time Australia could have made an extra 100. The records would have come with it if the two stayed out there, but they are not the most compelling reason to stay batting.
 
gregrowlerson said:
What an amazing innings from the Captain! And three batsman surpassing the ton is quite rare.

Very selfless to declare at this time. I think that the 329 undefeated still looks okay :)

That's what I like about the Aussies. They play for the win, not for records.
If it was a subcontinent Captain He wouldn't have declared till he broke the record or got out.
 
Jul 4, 2011
1,899
0
0
gregrowlerson said:
What an amazing innings from the Captain! And three batsman surpassing the ton is quite rare.

Very selfless to declare at this time. I think that the 329 undefeated still looks okay :)
Not so uncommon against India-Boosting averages since 1932
And this is better than a few months ago.

Asian- Dilshan's a selfless captain. He always thinks about the opposition and throws his wicket.
 
ramjambunath said:
Not so uncommon against India-Boosting averages since 1932
And this is better than a few months ago.

Asian- Dilshan's a selfless captain. He always thinks about the opposition and throws his wicket.

He's the exception:p. That's why he'll lose his job at the end of the SA tour.
 
Jul 4, 2011
1,899
0
0
Mark Taylor against Pakistan 334*

Clarke's 329* is the 3rd highest FC score at the SCG and the highest score by a captain in an FC match, eight ahead of Billy Murdoch (the last man before Capt Drunky Ponting who lost three ashes series as captain). The top 2 scores are by DG Bradman- 452* and 340* against Queensland and Victoria.
 
Jul 4, 2011
1,899
0
0
He'll be far better than Dilshan. Don't know why Dilshan was saying to the media that he was happy with Lanka's performance against Australia. Sri Lanka should have been favourites for the first test at least but were very poor.

Hopefully Sanga and Jayawardene do an SSC 2006 against the Saffies today.
 
Aug 31, 2011
324
0
0
Monumental innings from Clarke. His declaration was selfless as the pitch is clearly lifeless, and even though it's been out of form for a while, the Indian batting has obviously got the ability to click and fire at any moment.
 
Not many can wear a cricket uniform as their daily clothing.

04.jpg


Couldn't resist...
 
May 6, 2009
8,522
1
0
Sri Lanka are in real trouble, made to follow on with 341 runs in arrears to South Africa and Dilshan is already out.
 
Looks like India will look for another coach after this series. I always thought that Haddin was a better batsmen than a keeper as he showed again today. Makes Ian Healy look like a genius. India seem to be clueless and the field positions by the captain don't help. I think Australia declared at the right time.