elizab said:Uh, me. No doubt I would've walked away. Believe me?
You're different and a woman..not got the aggression and alpha traits that make those cyclists so easy to corrupt
elizab said:Uh, me. No doubt I would've walked away. Believe me?
elizab said:Uh, me. No doubt I would've walked away. Believe me?
well, Kik might be able to help you with that you know,elizab said:God knows my sins. I'm a pretty ****ty Christian. I try my best to do the right thing but often fail. I can't stand when people use God or cancer to protect and/or rehabilitate their image. Does my calling out hyprocrisy make me hypocritical because I myself am sinful? Maybe. But that's for an entirely different thread. thanks for the kind words, though
Neworld said:The silent voices of the clean, ethical, riders that pulled the pin and ran away from doped cycling are far more numerous that we may ever know.
lots of chicks have the A-type personality.Dave_1 said:You're different and a woman..not got the aggression and alpha traits that make those cyclists so easy to corrupt. I probably would have done it. It's the thuggish criminal stuff, the deceit and manipulation that are far far more serious than cheating to win bike races and is what needed punished. Cheating to win big races...almost everyone was at that. I can't get too angry really as would need to be at so many
elizab said:to answer Granville's question, Chewy says it best. I asked Cranky and he said armstrong was a good one day rider but too big to get over the climbs; pre cancer as big as he was there's no way he would've won the Tour.
One thing I'll add is I second blackcat: I too believe the guy was doping since his tri-athlete days. We'll never ever know someone's natural ability when they've been artificially enhanced all their life as a pro. We simply will never know. If you put everyone on the starting line clean, Frankie would never be able to climb but would be strong as an ox; Floyd would be able to climb as well as be strong as an ox; George would've won sprinting stages but not the likes of Cav never ever winning any mountain stages; Tyler, as nice as he is wouldn't have ever made a pro team - the kind that races in Europe. Now that's just my opinion folks. Everything is speculation kinda like, "Hmmm, what kind of Maserati could we have bought had Frankie become a junkie?"
TrackCynic said:As doping invariably starts (for most) at an early age, say 18-20, I would have gone straight to my parents and told them that Carmichael and friends were injecting me. Any rider who allowed themselves to be injected without either asking questions themselves or talking to a parent/mentor was just conveniently setting aside both the morality of it and the potential dangers to health. You can certainly be coerced into doing very wrong things when you're 18, but there is always an element of "I know this is a bad thing going on here".
TrackCynic said:As doping invariably starts (for most) at an early age, say 18-20, I would have gone straight to my parents and told them that Carmichael and friends were injecting me. Any rider who allowed themselves to be injected without either asking questions themselves or talking to a parent/mentor was just conveniently setting aside both the morality of it and the potential dangers to health. You can certainly be coerced into doing very wrong things when you're 18, but there is always an element of "I know this is a bad thing going on here".
MarkvW said:Genevieve Jeanson's parents trusted Aubut. Girl didn't have a chance.
Fortyninefourteen said:Correction:
Her parents were complicit, and empowered Aubut.
"Crawford remembers Armstrong's behavior as Oedipal. 'There's never been a father figure in Lance's life that hasn't ended up as a villain,' Crawford says. 'And every girl he has ever dated looked like his mother.'"
MarkvW said:Willfully blind?
ChewbaccaD said:Page 27
Who coined the term "Oedipus Tex?"
Jeremiah said:Dude, I don't know what you're on but he covered up in much more than cycling.
He duped medicine, politics, popular culture, industry, the whole planet.
Your point is basically meaningless.
ChrisE said:Get over it. I started calling Maseratti vortex, and the next thing you know Mark is being credited with it.
ChrisE said:I've seen things taken out of context, but this takes the cake.
I was responding to rubarb talking about LA and UCI corruption, and how I say it was corrupt before him.
From that, you extrapolate my reply as meaning I think LA wasn't corrupt in other things.You ask what I am on? Put down the glue.
I bet you're a lot fun at parties.
ChrisE said:Get over it. I started calling Maseratti vortex, and the next thing you know Mark is being credited with it.
MarkvW said:Darn! I always knew Maserati wrongly blamed me for starting that name! I'm innocent! The guilty person has confessed!!!
mewmewmew13 said:@JulietMacur: "Cycle of Lies: The Fall of Lance Armstrong," hit NY Times best seller list in its 1st week! Many thanks to everyone for reading my work.
red_flanders said:You should have vortexed him on the particulars.
MarkvW said:And now I'll never be able to.The guy's a true original.
Dave_1 said:You're different and a woman..not got the aggression and alpha traits that make those cyclists so easy to corrupt. I probably would have done it. It's the thuggish criminal stuff, the deceit and manipulation that are far far more serious than cheating to win bike races and is what needed punished. Cheating to win big races...almost everyone was at that. I can't get too angry really as would need to be at so many
rhubroma said:I don't know about that, because I remember back in 88 when he was just a young pup at the Holderness School, NH, he was "wicked" strong as they would say.
TrackCynic said:As doping invariably starts (for most) at an early age, say 18-20, I would have gone straight to my parents and told them that Carmichael and friends were injecting me. Any rider who allowed themselves to be injected without either asking questions themselves or talking to a parent/mentor was just conveniently setting aside both the morality of it and the potential dangers to health. You can certainly be coerced into doing very wrong things when you're 18, but there is always an element of "I know this is a bad thing going on here".