- May 26, 2009
- 4,114
- 0
- 0
I meant your opinion on whether or not he dopes will depend on how cleanish you think the peloton is. Sorry, I assumed most people would be able to insert a few obvious words into the argument.D-Queued said:How does Martin's cleanliness have anything to do with opinions on how cleanish the peloton is?
He is clean. Or, he isn't.
hrotha said:I meant your opinion on whether or not he dopes will depend on how cleanish you think the peloton is. Sorry, I assumed most people would be able to insert a few obvious words into the argument.
linkDan Martin @DanMartin86
Today i felt really good, then, after abit, bad, then near the end, really bad. 2moros another day. @Ride_Argyle doing great job as always
Big Doopie said:i love how hiring ex-dopers with the open and stated plan of giving those riders a pressure-free situation where they wouldn't have to dope. and then backing it up by not having a hint of doping issues since the team's inception is now worse than a rider who has been caught several times and chooses over and over to ride for dirty ds's and teams with renowned doping programs. freakin' hysterical.
and agreed the tests don't prove everything. but dan martin a well documented huge talent with genes to spare has had a relatively unremarkable career apart from a few highlights that came to the fore as the blood passport kicked in. he has been outspokenly anti-doping and continues to ride for a team and ds that are proponents of the same. there is no doctor attached to dan martin, etc., and etc., it goes on and on.
on the other hand, you have a serial doper who f#$k$ with his adoring fans by laughing in their face while he comes up with absolute ridiculous lies for why he was caught. A serial doper who then wants you to believe that all his mythical wins were untainted, when we know that to be a direct lie. fact is, not a single person can actually say how "naturally" talented clentadoppucci is. and that is why it is completely possible that a clean super-talented rider like dan martin might be able to stay within 7 mins of a doped minor talent like clentadoppucci after two weeks in a GT that has had almost no ITT...
it really is very simple. lol.
Benotti69 said:Axel Merckx really showed his genes in his career!
fmk_RoI said:Yeah but how good was Merckx's mammy? Cause, you know, the important genes are like the Force, they pass on the maternal side, not the paternal.
Benotti69 said:Pity Beryl Burton didn't have son then, cause he would've won the TdF 7 times at least...........
I have no doubt that Martin is talented. But to ride where he is, near the top of the sport takes more than talent.
hrotha said:Axel Merckx had a rather decent career.
fmk_RoI said:Semi decent. And only after Ferrari did his magic tricks.
Walkman said:Does it always?
Do you think Per Elofsson doped?
Sven-Åke Lundbäck had a VO2 Max of 94, that's like 10% or more above the average VO2 Max in the peloton (I remember reading something about the average was 80-85). A real outliner. Those guys exist. I my opinion you can be a the top of the game clean.
Benotti69 said:Dan Martin apparently has big allergies problems.......otherwise he'd have a Giro, Tdf and Worlds in the same year according to his genes.
Well duh. It was the 90s after all. Point is, his career is very often dismissed as if he was, dunno, Gorka Beloki. He had a lot more than just his surname going on for him.fmk_RoI said:Semi decent. And only after Ferrari did his magic tricks.
hrotha said:Well duh. It was the 90s after all. Point is, his career is very often dismissed as if he was, dunno, Gorka Beloki. He had a lot more than just his surname going on for him.
Benotti69 said:Dan Martin apparently has big allergies problems.......otherwise he'd have a Giro, Tdf and Worlds in the same year according to his genes.
Benotti69 said:If Dan was a huge talent, those type of numbers would be thrown in our faces by Vaughters.
Benotti69 said:Not sure why i should know cross country skiers doping habits of want to discuss them on a cycling forum!
Walkman said:I think your logic is a bit flawed here. Having the genetics to get a vo2 max above 90 doesn't guarantee you to attain it easily. It's not like every genetically gifted athlete also got the ability to suffer through all the hard training in order to get to the top.
What is Dan Martin was mentally weaker when younger and it's first now he is able to live up to his potential due to he fact that he is finally training as hard as it takes?
Walkman said:Yeah, I can buy this argument but at the same time,it does not prove anything.
Walkman said:Well, doping as a topic, not just regarding cycling, is discussed here from time to time and Elofsson is probably the best athlete out there that is considered to be clean. I was interesting to hear you view.
fmk_RoI said:Uh, he doesn't have Stephen Roche's genes. Laurence Roche never got near those wins, did he?
Benotti69 said:Dan Martin was so happy Impey got off. That doesn't sound like someone who has a problem with cheating!
fmk_RoI said:That - what you've said - sounds like someone who believes everyone is doping.
Fortunately, not everyone lives at the extremes of everyone's doping/everyone's not doping.
Benotti69 said:The Brits defend Sky, Wiggins, Kennaugh, Thomas...etc too many Celts defend Martin forgetting he competes in a sport known for doping and we know the sport has not changed its anti doping regime.
Benotti69 said:If Dan Martin wants to be considered clean he needs to do more than wear a bikepure bracelet.
No_Balls said:Wait?! Is it the same Dan Martin who is related to Omertá-upholder Stephen Roche?
