- Mar 13, 2013
- 4,857
- 903
- 17,680
Doping or doping riders is not illegal fmk. That's the point. Clearly if a member of staff breaks the law, I'm not paying for that. Be that £50 speeding ticket or murdering another member of staff.
I believe you'll find someone willing to make the argument that endangering health is illegal. It is commonly used in the absence of specific doping legislation.samhocking said:Doping or doping riders is not illegal fmk. That's the point. Clearly if a member of staff breaks the law, I'm not paying for that. Be that £50 speeding ticket or murdering another member of staff.
samhocking said:Poo, you sir!
You just changed the whole context from non-criminal to criminal. Brailsford doesn't even have a proven anti-doping violation against him/his team while freelance consultant yet, let alone one of endangering his riders health lol! Perhaps when talking about theoretical future events say that at the beginning, then we can have a real discussion.
thehog said:samhocking said:Poo, you sir!
You just changed the whole context from non-criminal to criminal. Brailsford doesn't even have a proven anti-doping violation against him/his team while freelance consultant yet, let alone one of endangering his riders health lol! Perhaps when talking about theoretical future events say that at the beginning, then we can have a real discussion.
JTL?
spetsa said:thehog said:samhocking said:Poo, you sir!
You just changed the whole context from non-criminal to criminal. Brailsford doesn't even have a proven anti-doping violation against him/his team while freelance consultant yet, let alone one of endangering his riders health lol! Perhaps when talking about theoretical future events say that at the beginning, then we can have a real discussion.
JTL?
Come on Hog. Don't be throwing any truth in there.
I have demonstrated, with your assistance, that contrary to what has been claimed, there is no absolute liability for an employee's legal fees.samhocking said:Poo, you sir!
You just changed the whole context from non-criminal to criminal. Brailsford doesn't even have a proven anti-doping violation against him/his team while freelance consultant yet, let alone one of endangering his riders health lol! Perhaps when talking about theoretical future events say that at the beginning, then we can have a real discussion.
thehog said:samhocking said:Poo, you sir!
You just changed the whole context from non-criminal to criminal. Brailsford doesn't even have a proven anti-doping violation against him/his team while freelance consultant yet, let alone one of endangering his riders health lol! Perhaps when talking about theoretical future events say that at the beginning, then we can have a real discussion.
JTL?
brownbobby said:thehog said:samhocking said:Poo, you sir!
You just changed the whole context from non-criminal to criminal. Brailsford doesn't even have a proven anti-doping violation against him/his team while freelance consultant yet, let alone one of endangering his riders health lol! Perhaps when talking about theoretical future events say that at the beginning, then we can have a real discussion.
JTL?
JTL = ADV against Sky/Brailsford? How so?
thehog said:brownbobby said:thehog said:samhocking said:Poo, you sir!
You just changed the whole context from non-criminal to criminal. Brailsford doesn't even have a proven anti-doping violation against him/his team while freelance consultant yet, let alone one of endangering his riders health lol! Perhaps when talking about theoretical future events say that at the beginning, then we can have a real discussion.
JTL?
JTL = ADV against Sky/Brailsford? How so?
Ummmmmmm he was riding for Sky and British Cycling. Simple math.
brownbobby said:thehog said:brownbobby said:thehog said:samhocking said:Poo, you sir!
You just changed the whole context from non-criminal to criminal. Brailsford doesn't even have a proven anti-doping violation against him/his team while freelance consultant yet, let alone one of endangering his riders health lol! Perhaps when talking about theoretical future events say that at the beginning, then we can have a real discussion.
JTL?
JTL = ADV against Sky/Brailsford? How so?
Ummmmmmm he was riding for Sky and British Cycling. Simple math.
Hmmm...Fair enough on the BC link if you like, albeit tenuous I think. I dont agree that he had anything to do with Sky at the time of the ADV, unless you're saying that BC/Sky were inextricably linked...
thehog said:He had a foot in each team. Nevertheless the suspension occurred whilst at Sky. There is no arguing that.
brownbobby said:thehog said:He had a foot in each team. Nevertheless the suspension occurred whilst at Sky. There is no arguing that.
It did...but the offence, the ABP anomaly occurred before he joined Sky (officially at least) No arguing that either.
thehog said:brownbobby said:thehog said:He had a foot in each team. Nevertheless the suspension occurred whilst at Sky. There is no arguing that.
It did...but the offence, the ABP anomaly occurred before he joined Sky (officially at least) No arguing that either.
Not true, there is no single value to the ABP, it’s measured on a longitude range basis rather than just one value causing an infraction.
At least be aware of the specifics.
samhocking said:Bit of confusion of the time period for the longtitudinal stuff there Hog.
JTL entered the ABP for the first time in September 2012 after he signed for Sky (Endura were Continental) and his first entries under Sky were made available to Sky in the ABP in Spring 2013. However, due to his stellar 2012 season with Endura, his 2012 Endura blood and urine samples were compared to the 2013 samples while at Sky and it was that longtitudanl change between Endura & Sky with the winter separating them that got him caught. Basically Locke assumed wrongly that his blood and urine tests before entering ABP in Spetember 2012 wouldnt't contribute to it, but they do. Basically his 2012 samples formed the base line in hios ABP and that baseline changed in 2013 after joiningg Sky, but the ABP offence was most definitely in the 2012 TOB with Endura while outside the ABP, not within it when at Sky.
This is not Tiernan-Locke’s first Team Sky training camp, however. The 27-year-old joined three of Sky’s Tour de France squad – Wiggins, Richie Porte and Kanstantsin Sivtsov – at a pre-Tour training camp in Tenerife.
The altitude training which took place on the volcanic island over the course of a number of camps was vital in Wiggins’ preparation for the Tour – and helped secure Tiernan-Locke a WorldTour contract.
“It was a little bit intimidating but the Tour de France was still some way off,” he says. “It was April, quite a long time before the Tour, so I knew I wouldn’t be getting in the way of their preparation
samhocking said:Bit of confusion of the time period for the longtitudinal stuff there Hog.
JTL entered the ABP for the first time in September 2012 after he signed for Sky (Endura were Continental) and his first entries under Sky were made available to Sky in the ABP in Spring 2013. However, due to his stellar 2012 season with Endura, his 2012 Endura blood and urine samples were compared to the 2013 samples while at Sky and it was that longtitudanl change between Endura & Sky with the winter separating them that got him caught. Basically Locke assumed wrongly that his blood and urine tests before entering ABP in Spetember 2012 wouldnt't contribute to it, but they do. Basically his 2012 samples formed the base line in hios ABP and that baseline changed in 2013 after joiningg Sky, but the ABP offence was most definitely in the 2012 TOB with Endura while outside the ABP, not within it when at Sky.
roundabout said:samhocking said:Bit of confusion of the time period for the longtitudinal stuff there Hog.
JTL entered the ABP for the first time in September 2012 after he signed for Sky (Endura were Continental) and his first entries under Sky were made available to Sky in the ABP in Spring 2013. However, due to his stellar 2012 season with Endura, his 2012 Endura blood and urine samples were compared to the 2013 samples while at Sky and it was that longtitudanl change between Endura & Sky with the winter separating them that got him caught. Basically Locke assumed wrongly that his blood and urine tests before entering ABP in Spetember 2012 wouldnt't contribute to it, but they do. Basically his 2012 samples formed the base line in hios ABP and that baseline changed in 2013 after joiningg Sky, but the ABP offence was most definitely in the 2012 TOB with Endura while outside the ABP, not within it when at Sky.
That's not really what happened either. As I recall, he had a crazy high OFF-score on his first ABP test (google says 155.8). His subsequent ABP tests were compared to the first one to show that the first test results were indeed abnormal. Also, as far as I remember, the only races he was DQed from were ToB and the Worlds.
Catwhoorg said:Poor lad, who could have forseen that dehydration after one night out would have such far reaching consequences.
gillan1969 said:IIRC the test was on the Saturday morning in Holland...his story was he got totally pished (32 units I think) on the thursday night after signing with SKY and then didn't drink anything at all on the Friday travelling to Holland, hence setting up the crazy score.
Of course he then went on to ride arguably the best ride of his career the next day in a race 90 mins longer than anything he had ever raced in before...
to be fair, less far-fetched than the periodically malfunctioning kidney ruse.....![]()
thehog said:Catwhoorg said:Poor lad, who could have forseen that dehydration after one night out would have such far reaching consequences.
What I meant was he was ‘unlucky’ that he couldn’t lose a laptop, create a altitudes natives report or just keep riding like Froome. Considering the absurdity of some Sky’s excuses for its riders poor ole JTL was left out in the cold.