- Sep 15, 2010
- 1,086
- 3
- 9,985
TubularBills said:Wait.
Doping isn't a sport?
DanielSong39 said:TubularBills said:Wait.
Doping isn't a sport?
Doping is the sport but fans put up with it to the point of plausible deniability. The line was crossed today
He didn't do anything alien uphill and group Dumoulin went slow af in the two descents.Koronin said:DanielSong39 said:TubularBills said:Wait.
Doping isn't a sport?
Doping is the sport but fans put up with it to the point of plausible deniability. The line was crossed today
Agreed. When you put in a performance like say Yates earlier there were plausible reasons for it. Today there is no plausible reason other than doping.
MartinGT said:Aye 80km solo like that all down to gels.
F@ck off SDB
Robert5091 said:Awfully quiet from "The Great Man" of cycling ... busy cleaning the bus for the TdF?
Brailsford said:“We have always had total confidence in Chris and his integrity. We knew that he had followed the right medical guidance in managing his asthma at the Vuelta and were sure that he would be exonerated in the end, which he has been. This is why we decided that it was right for Chris to continue racing, in line with UCI rules, while the process was ongoing. We are pleased that it has now been resolved.
“Chris’s elevated Salbutamol urine reading from Stage 18 of the Vuelta was treated as a ‘presumed’ Adverse Analytical Finding (AAF) by the UCI and WADA, which triggered a requirement for us to provide further information. After a comprehensive review of that information, relevant data and scientific research, the UCI and WADA have concluded that there was, in fact, no AAF and that no rule has been broken.
“We said at the outset that there are complex medical and physiological issues which affect the metabolism and excretion of Salbutamol. The same individual can exhibit significant variations in test results taken over multiple days while using exactly the same amount of Salbutamol. This means that the level of Salbutamol in a single urine sample, alone, is not a reliable indicator of the amount inhaled. A review of all Chris’s 21 test results from the Vuelta revealed that the Stage 18 result was within his expected range of variation and therefore consistent with him having taken a permitted dose of Salbutamol.
“Chris has proved he is a great champion – not only on the bike but also by how he has conducted himself during this period. It has not been easy, but his professionalism, integrity and good grace under pressure have been exemplary and a credit to the sport.
“The greatest bike race in the world starts in five days. We can’t wait to get racing again and help Chris win it for a record-equalling fifth time.”
And Sky fanboys eat that $hit up like it's candy.Benotti69 said:https://twitter.com/Johnny_Crash/status/1014581031020744706
Great tweet.
Brailsford wants everyone to believe that they're masters of every detail, yet they let their team leader get so dehydrated he scored a record breaking AAF.
So dehydrated he won the stage to boot.
It is a circus.
veganrob said:And Sky fanboys eat that $hit up like it's candy.Benotti69 said:https://twitter.com/Johnny_Crash/status/1014581031020744706
Great tweet.
Brailsford wants everyone to believe that they're masters of every detail, yet they let their team leader get so dehydrated he scored a record breaking AAF.
So dehydrated he won the stage to boot.
It is a circus.
I'd also like to see the person who leaked confidential information brought to book & make recompense & public apology to Froomey for the heartache brought to him, family, Team & Fans. The abuse given by the know-alls has been despicable. Go get that 5th Yellow Jersey Froomey
thehog said:veganrob said:And Sky fanboys eat that $hit up like it's candy.Benotti69 said:https://twitter.com/Johnny_Crash/status/1014581031020744706
Great tweet.
Brailsford wants everyone to believe that they're masters of every detail, yet they let their team leader get so dehydrated he scored a record breaking AAF.
So dehydrated he won the stage to boot.
It is a circus.
I did like this one from Liz Millar... hasn’t her brother told her how this cycling **** works?![]()
I'd also like to see the person who leaked confidential information brought to book & make recompense & public apology to Froomey for the heartache brought to him, family, Team & Fans. The abuse given by the know-alls has been despicable. Go get that 5th Yellow Jersey Froomey
Questionable going by long silence on the matter.... praising Froome and emphasising that he had always had his rider's back throughout the process.
- here we go, it never happened. UCI & WADA got it all wrong because of Froome's and the circumstance's uniqueness.'presumed AAF'
Well, if you read the comments below the stories, thank goodness for Sky and DB, as they have done cycling a "great service". There is a tremendous amount of BS flying right now.Robert5091 said:More word sallad, bs and obfuscation from "The Great Man" himself -
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/brailsford-looks-to-weather-storm-as-tour-de-france-looms/
Questionable going by long silence on the matter.... praising Froome and emphasising that he had always had his rider's back throughout the process.
- here we go, it never happened. UCI & WADA got it all wrong because of Froome's and the circumstance's uniqueness.'presumed AAF'
Robert5091 said:More word sallad, bs and obfuscation from "The Great Man" himself -
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/brailsford-looks-to-weather-storm-as-tour-de-france-looms/
Questionable going by long silence on the matter.... praising Froome and emphasising that he had always had his rider's back throughout the process.
- here we go, it never happened. UCI & WADA got it all wrong because of Froome's and the circumstance's uniqueness.'presumed AAF'
samhocking said:Robert5091 said:More word sallad, bs and obfuscation from "The Great Man" himself -
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/brailsford-looks-to-weather-storm-as-tour-de-france-looms/
Questionable going by long silence on the matter.... praising Froome and emphasising that he had always had his rider's back throughout the process.
- here we go, it never happened. UCI & WADA got it all wrong because of Froome's and the circumstance's uniqueness.'presumed AAF'
The 'presumed' AAF is WADA speak (Rabin uses the term in WADA press release) for AAFs that require further explanation to be make it an offical AAF so an ADRV can then proceed to being investigated or be considered no AAF at all as is Froomes.
What has confused many is they wrongly assumed the leaked AAF was after the presumed stage and was already a WADA confirmed AAF. It wasn't that was only decided on 28th June by WADA. As we now know the presumed AAF didn't even get to the confirmed AAF stage or an ADDV be brought against Froome whatsoever.
The presence in urine of salbutamol in excess of 1000ng/ml or formoterol in excess of 40ng/ml is presumed not to be an intended therapeutic use of the substance and will be considered as an Adverse Analytical Finding (AAF)
