Don't get me started...
The benefits Millar saw with my eyeballs swimming to the gills in EPO;
2000 TDF: 62nd Place
2001 TDF: Abandoned after Stage 10
2002 TDF: 68th Place
2003 TDF: 55th Place
I do disagree, now theres a suprise. His results in the Tour tell you everything about its benefits. I don't need to tell you anything. Did Millar see a continuation of success in the Tours & classics after EPO???.
2006
1st Individual pursuit, British National Track Championships
1st Stage 14, Vuelta a España
2007
1st British National Road Race Championships
1st British National Time Trial Championships
1st Prologue, Paris-Nice
2008
1st Stage 1 TTT Giro d'Italia
2nd Overall Tour of California
2009
1st Stage 20 Vuelta a España
1st Edinburgh Nocturne
Combativity award Stage 6, Tour de France
Again, I disagree. In fact, it can be argued he saw more success post EPO, as opposed to when he was swimming to the gills.
Millar was to ingonarant to know that increasing the oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood was only one limited factor to increasing cycling performance. He had another 8 or so legal factors to take advantage of but decided not to, EPO was better than dedicating his life to cycling & looking at other ways of increasing cycling performance.