FoxxyBrown1111 said:My case isn´t strong*. Never said this...
I just use the technique others use (like cherry picking, casting doubts, fingerpointing, crawling in the past, etc.).
You can spoil everybodys name, especially in cycling. But i don´t like it. I just wanna show where false acusations can lead. I thought that would be clear now after discussing Froome for almost two years...
If discussions in the clinic would be based on hard evidence, or at least on smoking guns (like it had been in the Armstrong case for years), then it would be ok. Now we only have obscure theories. Nothing more, nothing less...
* Neither is it in the case of the acusers. We all do not know if Froome is doping or not (but at least we know he is at least cleaner than many others, given the past we know about some of the so-called contenders who are still active in this very tour). In the end we have yet to get any doping link in the direction of Sky (unlike Lampre, Xacobeo, Saunier now Movistar, and so on, and so on)... That is my point i try to make clear every time i write about Froome. I just wanna play fair. But if others play unfair, i feel welcomed and do the same...
No doping link in the direction of sky you say?. I think for you as long as it's not lance or the spanish it's perfectly okay