Doping In Athletics

Page 45 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Sep 8, 2015
210
0
0
Re:

SeriousSam said:
All but the most fervent believers will surely be able to see this for the smokescreen it is.


Sadly I suspect, if the comments on the Daily Telegraph thread are anything to go by (can't believe a major paper allowed non pre moderated comments), many will not see it that way. The number of comments along the lines of "Brits don't dope" "Sunday Times = gutter press" etc etc are depressing.
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
the general rule is that people whose doping knowledge comes exclusively from people like Matt Slater and Fotheringham are liable to believe cows can fly, whereas people who have at some point in their life visited a message board or otherwise independent source will see through that kind of deception pretty easily.
 
Sep 8, 2015
210
0
0
Re:

the sceptic said:
the general rule is that people whose doping knowledge comes exclusively from people like Matt Slater and Fotheringham are liable to believe cows can fly, whereas people who have at some point in their life visited a message board or otherwise independent source will see through that kind of deception pretty easily.

so many people still trot out the line that PEDs won't have any effect in a skill sport e.g. football. Then, if you point them Google-wise in the direction of say, details of the Riccardo Agricola case, they just take it as evidence that only those dastardly foreigners dope. Tennis fans are the worst for this kind of wilful blindness overall, football fans a close second.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
It doesn't matter if the majority think Radcliffe is clean. It is the minority that know she doped that hurts her and bothers her.
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,853
2
0
Re:

SeriousSam said:
Quick, let's not forget about clean Paula and instead focus on the real cheaters!

Desperate stuff. All but the most fervent believers will surely be able to see this for the smokescreen it is.

no.

the most fervent believers believe in the cognitive dissonance. they believe in the chariotsoffire, they believe in the doping.

when they admit either with typing, or with oral inverted exaltation, it would be a little piece of them dies. it would be like denying yourself and appreciating significant element of your identity is built on straw. and it would hurt. it is easy to maintain the ruse, deflection and obfuscation. but bet you put them on a few shots of absinthe and pop them some ruphylin and they will be clear they believe paula doped.

the "tell" is in their vehemence

as shakespeare wrote in hamlet the lady doth protest too hard methinks
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,853
2
0
Re:

armchairclimber said:
More context... not likely to sway anyone's opinion re. PR but actually, for those interested in coaching and physiology, a fascinating interview.
http://www.runnersworld.com/rt-web-exclusive/gerard-hartmanns-front-row-seat-to-paula-radcliffes-career

here is the context climber, we think they are ALL doping at this level. We do not isolate Radcliffe.

now, here is the kicker. Her WR, the one "clean" person, has outperformed ALL the dopers.

Her WR shattered ALL the WR(s) by the dopers.

That is the context. That is all the context one needs to know.

plus, thanks to D-Queued, with his own take on the Ullrich arithmetic aphorism #UAA, 2+2. Dave's own take, marginal gains #MG aint the rounding error and pimple on a knat's arse (thats my own artistic licence)
that to exceed the WR's of the dopers, and the doping dopers, to exceed the WR's of the doping dopers (tautological pleonasm) and exceed the #DD's WRs clean, is utter BS. bovine scatology. BS. staccato
 
Sep 29, 2012
12,197
0
0
Re:

armchairclimber said:
Yeah yea, I get it... if you don't want to read stuff then don't read it.

Oh I read it. A few days ago. It's why I am saying what I am saying.

Her regular sessions with Dr Actovegin don't seem to be getting as much air play? Strange, don't you think? Instead, a white knight comes to rescue the princess, and repetitively restate said princess is tougher than any other athlete he has treated except for one dude.

Gotcha.
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,853
2
0
Re:

Fearless Greg Lemond said:
http://www.hartmann-international.com/Articles/1/The-Irish-Midas.aspx

Also known as Midas...

good find FGL

who would have known the micks have their own chariots of fire and gordonstoun and muscular roman chatholicism
 
Sep 8, 2015
210
0
0
Re: Re:

Dear Wiggo said:
Her regular sessions with Dr Actovegin.....

Talking of sports doctors (assuming you're referring to Mueller-Wohlfahrt).

In the current climate, why don't the Sunday Times or whoever take a poke around in the history of said gentlemen? There are many interesting stories to tell, especially wrt to those Ossi sports doctors who left Germany after Reunification and worked in sports other than athletics.

It's an underdeveloped area of sports reporting.
 
Apr 20, 2012
6,320
0
0
Re: Re:

Cake said:
Dear Wiggo said:
Her regular sessions with Dr Actovegin.....

Talking of sports doctors (assuming you're referring to Mueller-Wohlfahrt).

In the current climate, why don't the Sunday Times or whoever take a poke around in the history of said gentlemen? There are many interesting stories to tell, especially wrt to those Ossi sports doctors who left Germany after Reunification and worked in sports other than athletics.

It's an underdeveloped area of sports reporting.
I seem to remember some injured Dutch soccer players being treated with calfsblood, the Dutch media reported on it as of it was some kinda miracle treatment: in reality and in other sports like cycling the media would scream: DOPING.

I think that sums up the media interest in Muller Wohlfart kinda types...
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
When this is what UKAD ceo is saying, why would you expect clean athletes?

“The last thing any huge tournament like this (Rugby WC) wants is a doping scandal,” Nicole Sapstead, UKAD chief executive

On top of that the guy running IAAF gets a six figure salary from Nike?

It really stinks.
 
Re: Re:

Fearless Greg Lemond said:
I seem to remember some injured Dutch soccer players being treated with calfsblood, the Dutch media reported on it as of it was some kinda miracle treatment: in reality and in other sports like cycling the media would scream: DOPING.

Acto-whatever-you-call it - calf's blood - has been on and off the banned list almost as many times as Elizabeth Taylor's been married.
 
Apr 20, 2012
6,320
0
0
Re: Re:

fmk_RoI said:
Fearless Greg Lemond said:
I seem to remember some injured Dutch soccer players being treated with calfsblood, the Dutch media reported on it as of it was some kinda miracle treatment: in reality and in other sports like cycling the media would scream: DOPING.

Acto-whatever-you-call it - calf's blood - has been on and off the banned list almost as many times as Elizabeth Taylor's been married.
Not in Eddy Planckaert's time though ;)
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
Walsh to the rescue!

COyGu80VAAIjEdu.jpg
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Re: Re:

thehog said:
the sceptic said:
Walsh to the rescue!

COyGu80VAAIjEdu.jpg

Walsh who single handily took down Armstrong? Can he do it again?! :cool:

Nope. last tweet was Sept9th. No big article today on Radcliffe in ST.

I guess Walsh is finished with his anti doping stories. Wants to spend his retirement ghosting autobiogs of the sports elites.......
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Re: Re:

blackcat said:
armchairclimber said:
More context... not likely to sway anyone's opinion re. PR but actually, for those interested in coaching and physiology, a fascinating interview.
http://www.runnersworld.com/rt-web-exclusive/gerard-hartmanns-front-row-seat-to-paula-radcliffes-career

here is the context climber, we think they are ALL doping at this level. We do not isolate Radcliffe.

now, here is the kicker. Her WR, the one "clean" person, has outperformed ALL the dopers.

Her WR shattered ALL the WR(s) by the dopers.


That is the context. That is all the context one needs to know.

plus, thanks to D-Queued, with his own take on the Ullrich arithmetic aphorism #UAA, 2+2. Dave's own take, marginal gains, #MR aint the rounding error and pimple on a knat's arse (thats my own artistic licence)
that to exceed the WR's of the dopers, and the doping dopers, to exceed the WR's of the doping dopers (tautological pleonasm) and exceed the #DD's WRs clean, is utter BS. bovine scatology. BS. staccato

Well put and simply read like this, there is no way Radcliffe was clean.NO WAY!