Re: Re:
It could be the case that the retest was done at a different lab, with more sensitive equipment.
That being said, I'm not sure why they would retest it at all. It's not like it was part of an mass-retest put on by the IOC.
pastronef said:Mayomaniac said:Apparently Alex Schwarzer got busted once again.
http://www.gazzetta.it/Atletica/21-...sca-trovato-ancora-positivo-16061486727.shtml
They say that they restested a sample that was taken on the first of Janury on the 12th of May, 4 days after he qualified for the olympics, and it came back positive, apparently some sort of anabolic steroid.
he was tested on Jan 1st and nothing was found
the same sample was RE-tested on May 12 and it came back positive
all the other tests he did this year, between Jan 1 and May 12 were ok.
I think they'll go with the lab mistake excuse?
It could be the case that the retest was done at a different lab, with more sensitive equipment.
That being said, I'm not sure why they would retest it at all. It's not like it was part of an mass-retest put on by the IOC.