Doping in other sports?

Page 103 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jul 20, 2015
653
0
0
Re:

argel said:
Well you've got to question the desire for change amongst ownership.Someone like Jerry Jones (Dallas Cowboys owner) isn't going to be beating down the doors for HGH testing, purely because it potentially dilutes the talent on the field. The owners benefit from HGH, but can play it both ways by simply washing their hands of any responsibility when players are caught.

The negotiations during collective bargaining agreements will come down to trying to manipulate the other side into thinking that what you've given up in terms of non-critical issues (HGH testing, suspension policies etc) matches up with the $ amount. The owners played it really well last time, made the players look greedy and selfish when they were locked out and the blame was equal. It's telling though, that HGH was never a deal-breaker. The owners are happy to absorb the 'few bad apples' rubbish, when there are plenty of whistle-blowers who estimate PED use at anywhere between 30%-75% depending on which former player you ask. I suspect it's closer to the former, but I think it would cover a large number of active, prominent high-end players.

The sad thing is 4 games makes it worth it. It's 'a quarter of a season' in theory, but it won't feel like that, as it's literally 4 weeks. I'd also contend that for guys on the 'roster bubble' ie: in danger of not making the team or being cut, the trade-off is a non-brainer.

It's sad though. It's the sport I work most closely with and some days it just gets you down, you start to wonder what it would take for them to get serious. Probably 5-6 marquee players getting busted in one go. Would not be surprised at all to find a UCI/Lance style cover up if that occurred.

Like a Balco scandal then
 
Jul 24, 2015
119
0
0
Yeah, but that really was a more private enterprise that used word of mouth to attract the big guns.

I don't think teams in any american sport are doping systemically. They can't or won't put themselves in a position to hurt the bottom-line by colluding with the dopers, as that could prompt a huge scandal that hurt viewing figures, TV deals, attendances and the general popularity of the sport. What I think is that they turn a massive blind eye to the signs of doping. For all we complain about cycling, we as amateurs have massive access to professional biological data and circumstantial evidence that makes us hyper-aware of PED use, particularly as this is a sport where aerobic/strength performance can be significantly aided by it in a very obvious way to the layman.

Contrast this with the NFL, a sport where there are 53 players on the field, of varying sizes and weights, with differing performance expectations (a QB has next to no use for PEDs, for example) and a 'PVP' element, where the strongest guy wins. If you're a lineman, for example, and you beat a guy all game long, they'll just say he was weaker than you, or his technique was wrong. The excuses write themselves and are propagated by the media.

With baseball, hockey, basketball etc... it's the same thing. Where do you quantify the results? Is it because a home run goes further? Because it's partly skill-based, there's an element of 'well it didn't make him hit the ball' or 'it didn't make him score more 3pt shots'. Team owners in all 4 major sports have no reason to add HGH testing urgently, as fans are prepared to suspend their disbelief and buy into teh idea that they're all clean.
 
With regards to doping in NFL, I think the tipping point will come out of this concussion discussion. In my mind, the most meaningful way to make players realize the dangers of doping is to tie it to dangers they are realizing now: getting hit really really hard. I've said for a while that the rise in concussions is better diagnostics, but also that players are hitting each other harder than ever, in part due to doping. That concussions are a national discussion is fuel, but a spark may unfortunately be a gnarly hit that by a player immediately tied to doping.

As for baseball, I don't think enough fans see it as enough of a physical contest to care about doping. Cycling or athletics has fans that don't care, because they think it is a pevel playing field, and the ones that do care donso because they know dope skews the contest. While of course baseball is impacted by drugs, the discussion is always about what pitchers are in the rotation, who made the error that lost the game, and how many millions a player is getting next year. no one talks about which team or players have more speed, or more power, or more endurance. It's just not seen as part of the game.
 
Jul 24, 2015
119
0
0
Yeah I agree that another positive of concussions is making players more aware of their long-term health. There are a number of players from the 70s and 80s who suffered either mental or physical repercussions of the steroids that were available in that era (Lyle Alzado blamed it for his brain tumour which is debatable) and there are of course a lot of suicides in former players that are linked to steroid abuse.

The problem you have is that for NFL owners, they would need to admit their knowledge of the problem if they introduce rigorous HGH testing or even get more serious about looking at the physiological signs of doping. They couldn't just do it overnight without pre-warning the players, because half of the league might end up suspended and your only option is either a cover up or brand suicide.

This is a quote about teh current method of HGH testing:

"The isoform test that the NFL used this season to test for HGH "doesn't catch many people at all," Catlin told USA TODAY Sports. "It's not a test that's designed to really do that. It will catch you if you just used it a few hours ago, but if it's a day or more, it's not going to find you."

The league knows this. They would probably like to find 1-2 so they can prove that the test works and they don't need to be more inventive with how they do this, but they aren't doing this to catch the guys with a pre-planned Regimen like USP, they're doing it to catch the morons who get careless.
 
Jul 20, 2015
653
0
0
Alex Rodriguez repeatedly guilty drug cheat, just turned 40 after 3+ seasons of being rubbish, injured and suspended has hit 23 HR's already this year and is a top 10 hitter. Oh yeah and he just turned 40! It looks, sounds and walks very much like a duck
 
Re:

gazr99 said:
Alex Rodriguez repeatedly guilty drug cheat, just turned 40 after 3+ seasons of being rubbish, injured and suspended has hit 23 HR's already this year and is a top 10 hitter. Oh yeah and he just turned 40! It looks, sounds and walks very much like a duck

Rodriguez is one of the most fascinating athletes in all of sports.
Guy has been implicated more times than anyone and suspended for an entire year, yet he keeps coming back and performing at superhuman levels. Does anyone think he reverted to bread and water during his year-long suspension? Of course not.
He just doesn't give a ***.
Only issue I take is with the notion that he was rubbish before his suspension. Not true at all.
He is one of the best baseball players ever.
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,853
2
0
Re: Re:

the delgados said:
gazr99 said:
Alex Rodriguez repeatedly guilty drug cheat, just turned 40 after 3+ seasons of being rubbish, injured and suspended has hit 23 HR's already this year and is a top 10 hitter. Oh yeah and he just turned 40! It looks, sounds and walks very much like a duck

Rodriguez is one of the most fascinating athletes in all of sports.
Guy has been implicated more times than anyone and suspended for an entire year, yet he keeps coming back and performing at superhuman levels. Does anyone think he reverted to bread and water during his year-long suspension? Of course not.
He just doesn't give a ***.
Only issue I take is with the notion that he was rubbish before his suspension. Not true at all.
He is one of the best baseball players ever.
YES! is there a stat for accmulating supermodel and actresses vaginas? I think it may be in the II pudenda II column
he's batting a .56 by my reckoning
 
Re: Re:

blackcat said:
the delgados said:
gazr99 said:
Alex Rodriguez repeatedly guilty drug cheat, just turned 40 after 3+ seasons of being rubbish, injured and suspended has hit 23 HR's already this year and is a top 10 hitter. Oh yeah and he just turned 40! It looks, sounds and walks very much like a duck

Rodriguez is one of the most fascinating athletes in all of sports.
Guy has been implicated more times than anyone and suspended for an entire year, yet he keeps coming back and performing at superhuman levels. Does anyone think he reverted to bread and water during his year-long suspension? Of course not.
He just doesn't give a ***.
Only issue I take is with the notion that he was rubbish before his suspension. Not true at all.
He is one of the best baseball players ever.
YES! is there a stat for accmulating supermodel and actresses vaginas? I think it may be in the II pudenda II column
he's batting a .56 by my reckoning

Anyone who has a centaur painting with his likeness above his bed is batting 1.000 in my books.
Well done, A-Rod!
 
Wanderlei Silva has been making pretty much a non-stop stream of accusations of improprieties against the UFC ever since he quit (rather than being fired) after dodging an OOC before a fight last year. I'm sure Dana White and the UFC's attorneys have just been biding their time, waiting for Silva to say something outlandish enough to make himself vulnerable to civil action, which they would avail themselves of just as a means to shut him up. Silva recently posted on Facebook that he had proof the UFC were fixing fights, which the UFC's lawyer's seem to think suite their needs. So they have filed suit against The Axe Murderer in a Nevada district court for Intentional Misconduct for what they call defamation and business disparagement. Seems to me that fight fixing is the most defamatory thing you can accuse a fight organisation of, so unless he genuinely has this proof, I'd say the UFC probably has just the muzzle they were looking for.
 
Re:

argel said:
Well you've got to question the desire for change amongst ownership.Someone like Jerry Jones (Dallas Cowboys owner) isn't going to be beating down the doors for HGH testing, purely because it potentially dilutes the talent on the field. The owners benefit from HGH, but can play it both ways by simply washing their hands of any responsibility when players are caught.

The negotiations during collective bargaining agreements will come down to trying to manipulate the other side into thinking that what you've given up in terms of non-critical issues (HGH testing, suspension policies etc) matches up with the $ amount. The owners played it really well last time, made the players look greedy and selfish when they were locked out and the blame was equal. It's telling though, that HGH was never a deal-breaker. The owners are happy to absorb the 'few bad apples' rubbish, when there are plenty of whistle-blowers who estimate PED use at anywhere between 30%-75% depending on which former player you ask. I suspect it's closer to the former, but I think it would cover a large number of active, prominent high-end players.

The sad thing is 4 games makes it worth it. It's 'a quarter of a season' in theory, but it won't feel like that, as it's literally 4 weeks. I'd also contend that for guys on the 'roster bubble' ie: in danger of not making the team or being cut, the trade-off is a non-brainer.

It's sad though. It's the sport I work most closely with and some days it just gets you down, you start to wonder what it would take for them to get serious. Probably 5-6 marquee players getting busted in one go. Would not be surprised at all to find a UCI/Lance style cover up if that occurred.

4 games isn't the punishment for doping. Its the punishment for being too stupid to avoid the 2 tests a year they actually do/ too poor to have a top doctor organize your doping.

I doubt there's anyone in the pro bowl year to year who isn't on gear.
 
Feb 24, 2015
241
0
0
Re:

argel said:
Yeah, but that really was a more private enterprise that used word of mouth to attract the big guns.

I don't think teams in any american sport are doping systemically. They can't or won't put themselves in a position to hurt the bottom-line by colluding with the dopers, as that could prompt a huge scandal that hurt viewing figures, TV deals, attendances and the general popularity of the sport. What I think is that they turn a massive blind eye to the signs of doping. For all we complain about cycling, we as amateurs have massive access to professional biological data and circumstantial evidence that makes us hyper-aware of PED use, particularly as this is a sport where aerobic/strength performance can be significantly aided by it in a very obvious way to the layman.

Contrast this with the NFL, a sport where there are 53 players on the field, of varying sizes and weights, with differing performance expectations (a QB has next to no use for PEDs, for example) and a 'PVP' element, where the strongest guy wins. If you're a lineman, for example, and you beat a guy all game long, they'll just say he was weaker than you, or his technique was wrong. The excuses write themselves and are propagated by the media.

With baseball, hockey, basketball etc... it's the same thing. Where do you quantify the results? Is it because a home run goes further? Because it's partly skill-based, there's an element of 'well it didn't make him hit the ball' or 'it didn't make him score more 3pt shots'. Team owners in all 4 major sports have no reason to add HGH testing urgently, as fans are prepared to suspend their disbelief and buy into teh idea that they're all clean.
\
I am sorry to say that I don't think this is entirely accurate.
The system wide use of PEDS is very well embedded in NFL if you ask me
I have friends who have a son who is 16 and 240 lbs which is huge!!!! he has been told by the three best colleges in the USA for Football scholoarships that he needs to put on 30lbs AT LEAST to even be considered, it is way before the NFL that these kids are started onto the PED route and they are on it for their whole careers.
Also the idea that a quarter back is not on PEDS is ridiculous, they have as much need of PEDS as anyone else - while the front men are on the anabolic steroids and bulking agents the QB is probably on testosterone, probably some dianobol to increase power in the shoulder and back and to help with fluid retention around the shoulder joint and flexibility and potentially some sort of stabiliser to allow the adrenaline to be counteracted and for them to be able to make the right choices.
These will all be more pertinent once the QB starts to get older.
As for the running backs - see whatever Bolt or Gatlin are on.

I agree that the owners have no wish to change it and neither do the fans. NFL is like the WWE with helmets on.

As for baseball - I am english so will not get into a serious discussion about a game of rounders - Sorry.
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,853
2
0
Re: Re:

Rob27172 said:
argel said:
I am sorry to say that I don't think this is entirely accurate.
The system wide use of PEDS is very well embedded in NFL if you ask me
I have friends who have a son who is 16 and 240 lbs which is huge!!!! he has been told by the three best colleges in the USA for Football scholoarships that he needs to put on 30lbs AT LEAST to even be considered, it is way before the NFL that these kids are started onto the PED route and they are on it for their whole careers.
Also the idea that a quarter back is not on PEDS is ridiculous, they have as much need of PEDS as anyone else - while the front men are on the anabolic steroids and bulking agents the QB is probably on testosterone, probably some dianobol to increase power in the shoulder and back and to help with fluid retention around the shoulder joint and flexibility and potentially some sort of stabiliser to allow the adrenaline to be counteracted and for them to be able to make the right choices.
These will all be more pertinent once the QB starts to get older.
As for the running backs - see whatever Bolt or Gatlin are on.

I agree that the owners have no wish to change it and neither do the fans. NFL is like the WWE with helmets on.

As for baseball - I am english so will not get into a serious discussion about a game of rounders - Sorry.

Jerome Bettis at Pittsburgh, the bus, as he was and will always be known, what, he was 115kg and about 5'10"?

thats some freekin #NOTNORMAL. And to hypothesize Tom Brady aint on roids is not hypothetical, its stupidity. They all dope.
 
Yeah, the idea that qbs wouldn't dope is silly. Every game 7 300 pound beasts stand right in front of him with the sole aim all game of hurting him. They don't take painkillers? They don't need arm strength? Why won't Peyton just play for ever then? Being faster wouldn't help escape sacks?
 
Mar 25, 2013
5,389
0
0
The Sunday Times tomorrow.

CLWcGZ8WUAEmQ1-.jpg
 
Mar 27, 2015
444
0
0
wonderful

maybe now cycling will get the recognition it deserves as most advanced anti doping sport.

with all the suckage , compared to rest of the sports, cycling is a beacon of light from anti doping pov :D
 
Mar 25, 2013
5,389
0
0
The Hitch said:
I know you are a big fan of the whole Murdoch sports empire, but this investigation was done by ARD in Germany not Walsh's sell out Times.

Fan of Murdoch. :rolleyes: I barely read that paper. Walsh has nothing to do with this. Jonathan Calvert is the author of the article above and you would want to check his past record first before throwing out your sell-out comment.

I recognised ARD and Hajo Seppelt's brilliant work in another thread. The Sunday Times and ARD were the two outlets that got access to the 12,000 blood tests. The Sunday Times tomorrow has an article where last weekend they spoke to the top British athlete who is on the list of having abnormal blood values. The Sunday Times got their own experts to look at this. They even claim it's a one in a thousand of being natural.

That's a fact and no agenda on your part can get away from it.
 
Apr 7, 2015
656
0
0
It's a good thing football is clean at least. You know, being about technique and all that. In football, as opposed to all other sports, technique is about the mental, not the physical. I mean, it's not like if two players share the same physical attributes that the one who is most physically fit will have the better technique, certainly not after 90 minutes of hard play! No, technique is a constant, something you are born with and that you cannot change. It's a mystical, almost spiritual thing. And that is why drugs don't work in football. Even if footballers would use them I mean - which is doubtful, since, after all, they have already got all that money. Why use drugs to earn money when you are already a millionaire? Seems like common sense to me. Anyway, the problem with Arsenal is that they always try to walk it in.