Re:
Like a Balco scandal then
argel said:Well you've got to question the desire for change amongst ownership.Someone like Jerry Jones (Dallas Cowboys owner) isn't going to be beating down the doors for HGH testing, purely because it potentially dilutes the talent on the field. The owners benefit from HGH, but can play it both ways by simply washing their hands of any responsibility when players are caught.
The negotiations during collective bargaining agreements will come down to trying to manipulate the other side into thinking that what you've given up in terms of non-critical issues (HGH testing, suspension policies etc) matches up with the $ amount. The owners played it really well last time, made the players look greedy and selfish when they were locked out and the blame was equal. It's telling though, that HGH was never a deal-breaker. The owners are happy to absorb the 'few bad apples' rubbish, when there are plenty of whistle-blowers who estimate PED use at anywhere between 30%-75% depending on which former player you ask. I suspect it's closer to the former, but I think it would cover a large number of active, prominent high-end players.
The sad thing is 4 games makes it worth it. It's 'a quarter of a season' in theory, but it won't feel like that, as it's literally 4 weeks. I'd also contend that for guys on the 'roster bubble' ie: in danger of not making the team or being cut, the trade-off is a non-brainer.
It's sad though. It's the sport I work most closely with and some days it just gets you down, you start to wonder what it would take for them to get serious. Probably 5-6 marquee players getting busted in one go. Would not be surprised at all to find a UCI/Lance style cover up if that occurred.
Like a Balco scandal then