- Aug 18, 2012
- 1,171
- 0
- 0
slowspoke said:This is a very interesting read.
http://www.rte.ie/sport/athletics/2014/0808/635892-column-gillick-discusses-doping-in-athletics/
slowspoke said:This is a very interesting read.
http://www.rte.ie/sport/athletics/2014/0808/635892-column-gillick-discusses-doping-in-athletics/
slowspoke said:This is a very interesting read.
http://www.rte.ie/sport/athletics/2014/0808/635892-column-gillick-discusses-doping-in-athletics/
It's voluntary supplementary testing, not mandated by any governing body. It's entirely at Mayweather's behest. He insists on USADA running a full testing program for him and his opponent for all his fights and he pays for it himself.dunnem8 said:As part of some sort of 'beef' between Floyd Mayweather and 50 Cent (bare with me), Mayweather posted a photo of his last 2 paychecks from boxing. Here is the link: https://twitter.com/FloydMayweather/status/503053608963698689
On both checks there is an 'Anti Doping' charge deducted from the total. In both cases it is for $25,000. Does anybody have an idea what this covers? Is he paying for all of his own testing? Is he contributing to the Anti Doping body like you would a charity? Why would the fighter have any input into the process, would the boxing governing body not be the ones to foot the bill for testing? Any light on the situation would be great!
dunnem8 said:Cheers Parker! So is Mayweather considered 100% clean then? Is it publicly known or otherwise that a potential opponent has refused the testing program set out by Mayweather?
No idea what the perceptions of him are, but he certainly appears to go the extra mile that other fighters don't. He has no influence about when or where he gets tested or for what, he just gives the money to USADA and lets them get on with it.dunnem8 said:Cheers Parker! So is Mayweather considered 100% clean then? Is it publicly known or otherwise that a potential opponent has refused the testing program set out by Mayweather?
Walkman said:Interesting read!
What I can't understand is why countries without a proper anti-doping program is allowed to compete in the World Championships and the Olympics. They should standardize the number of tests each country must do, per athlete, and then demand full insight in these programs and those countries who failed to live up to the standards will simply not be allowed to compete.
I remember reading a piece that a german sprinter wrote. He was really angry because Usain Bilt didn't even know how to fill out an anti-dpoing forms…
http://grg51.typepad.com/steroid_nation/2008/08/german-olympic.html
Parker said:No idea what the perceptions of him are, but he certainly appears to go the extra mile that other fighters don't. He has no influence about when or where he gets tested or for what, he just gives the money to USADA and lets them get on with it.
Doping has long been the major bone of contention between him and Pacquiao (in what would comfortably be the biggest grossing fight of all time). Mayweather's people have basically called Pacquiao a doper in the past and Pacquiao has used just about every lame excuse he can think of to refuse.
Mayweather might be up to something, but I'd have much more faith in him than Pacquiao.
SeriousSam said:No, doping was only very briefly a bone of contention between the two. Pacquiano initially didn't want extra tests but then agreed. It still didn't happen. Money was the real deal breaker.
Doping is rampant in boxing and Floyd is obviously a doper. His insistence of tests is about as credible as Tyson Gay being part of project belief. Or that some athlete would never dope because they're devout Christians.
Sure money was an issue, but doping wasn't 'only very briefly' an issue. It was first raised in 2009 and only fully agreed to in 2012.SeriousSam said:No, doping was only very briefly a bone of contention between the two. Pacquiano initially didn't want extra tests but then agreed. It still didn't happen. Money was the real deal breaker.
SeriousSam said:Money was the real deal breaker.
SeriousSam said:No, doping was only very briefly a bone of contention between the two. Pacquiano initially didn't want extra tests but then agreed. It still didn't happen. Money was the real deal breaker.
Doping is rampant in boxing and Floyd is obviously a doper. His insistence of tests is about as credible as Tyson Gay being part of project belief. Or that some athlete would never dope because they're devout Christians.
So you're basically calling me a racist?The Hitch said:I find it funny that someone who staunchly defends some of the most ridiculous athletes of all time from doping accusations, throws them at the little Philipino
You can be sure they would be on the other side of the fence on this if Manny represented a more Anglo Saxon country.
The Hitch said:And iirc got massive ammounts of abuse for it.
Merckx index said:Not really, it was just another excuse. Much of the deal-breaking was and is Bob Arum, and his hatred of FM. The injury to Manny that took six months to heal, the new venue that had to be built when they discovered that Floyd could fight before he went to jail, and on and on.
And it's mutual, Floyd doesn't want to do Arum any favors. Plus I strongly suspect Floyd preferred to wait a few years for Manny to continue taking hard knocks from larger opponents to soften him up before getting in the ring with him.
Both sides have used one excuse after another, from the very beginning. Floyd never indicated any interest in Olympic-style testing until the negotiations with Manny. I think it was largely a ploy to get into Manny's head, and possibly to avoid the fight completely. But Pacquiao was just as ridiculous with his bogus excuse that a blood withdrawal close to a fight would weaken him, and his fear of needles, this from a guy with serious tats.
Bottom line is that if either fighter wanted this fight 100%, no matter what, the fight could have been made.
Catwhoorg said:UKAD bans for 2 years Vahid Hosseinpoor (Wrestling)
Link to press release
Tamoxifen analytical positive.
Just FYI Mr Cookson, should you read the thread. THIS IS TRANSPARENCY.
jens_attacks said:if you're serious, you made my day![]()