sniper said:nice post, but didn't you get Jiri Dvorak's memo?
doping in soccer is not an issue.
"Of course there are individual cases, for sure. We do more than 30,000 sampling procedures every year and we have between 70 to 90 positive cases, most of them for marijuana and cocaine and we have also anabolic steroids, but these are individual cases."
http://articles.timesofindia.indiat...1005585_1_fifa-jiri-dvorak-confederations-cup
hehe, you like the FIFA sense of humour too?
It's just as well we have FIFA to look after the interests of the game, always reassuring to know that there are only 'individual cases' and certainly not any cases when teams such as Juventus ran a systematic doping programme and were let off scot free despite getting caught running a systematic doping programme.
Imagine if other Champion teams such as Marseille had been doping their players too. But this never happened.
We know football is clean because the Spanish authorities were perfectly happy to let WADA see all of the records in Op Puerto because none of them could have possibly related to footballers.
We also know that no German players ever doped, even though a recent report just announced findings about doping in West Germany, but footballers don't dope, only cyclists and sprinters do. Nothing too see in football, move along now, show's over.
No top players such as Rio Ferdinand would ever so much as miss a drug test because they forgot about it and went shopping instead and their phone was turned off until it was too late to come back and take the test. That doesn't happen in football as it's 100% clean. Brits don't dope anyway, the Queen wouldn't approve.
Arsene Wenger was probably playing a practical joke when he talked about abnormal blood values. FIFA wouldn't stand for any immoral behaviour.
Yes, FIFA are correct, I mean no sport in history has had a serious doping problem yet returned so many negative drug tests. Doping in football is implausible.