Tomorrow and sunday could serve as an indication of whos form is "right on time"
be it from training, or .. "training"
be it from training, or .. "training"
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Shardi said:Tomorrow and sunday could serve as an indication of whos form is "right on time"
be it from training, or .. "training"
Armchaircyclist said:----------
I guess you did not read the whole thing. In the end they mention that these are not elite athletes. We're talking about doping to beat your neighbour, or win your age-group here. How sad is that ?
neineinei said:According to Damsgaard the testing at the Falun Worlds will be like this:
Blood testing for all at arrival Falun.
Top 4 at every race gets tested + 2 more from the Top 10.
+ unanounced targeted tests
http://www.expressen.se/sport/langdskidor/nya-doping-kan-inte-avslojas---hotar-vm/ (Swedish)
Looks like someone has prepared well.Shardi said:I guess it will be Kalla!
kosmonaut said:Looks like someone has prepared well.
In Davos before xmas she was 56 secs behind Bj?rgen on the same distance. Today 36 in front.
lol. yet, when looking at performance flags, i like to take a more analytical, longer view before jumping...Kokoso said:Kalla beat Norewgian - hence she's doper. Lol.
python said:1. did kalla surprise every one today and by how much ? she certainly did and her advantage margin was around 5% over a runner-up legend of the sport that usually wins the discipline. 5% is quite significant, particularly, when it is over bjoergen who usually puts 5-10% almost over all non-norwegians.
python said:2. did kalla have a ski prep advantage ? it does not look that way, though, post race she said the skis felt great. i say no, b/c if the swedes did have superior skis as a team, some other swedish girls would be closer. yet they were at least 1.5 min back. Also, today was not the weather that would typically be hard to figure - firmly below zero..
Tyler'sTwin said:2.6% faster than Bjorgen, 3.8% Johaug, 4.3% Weng.
i made those observations/points from memory following just watching the race..i was having in mind the qualitative trends that i could recall.Tyler'sTwin said:2.6% faster than Bjorgen, 3.8% Johaug, 4.3% Weng.
Top norges vs lesser swedes:
BJOERGEN Marit 1980 NOR 24:02.5
JOHAUG Therese 1988 NOR 24:19.7 +17.2
WENG Heidi 1991 NOR 24:27.4 +24.9
BLECKUR Sofia 1984 SWE 24:51.7 +49.2
RYDQVIST Maria 1983 SWE 25:00.5 +58
WIKEN Emma 1989 SWE 25:08.2 +1:05.7
ANDERSSON Ebba 1997(!) SWE 25:13.6 +1:11.1
python said:cker for any fan of the sports greatest legend- einar ole bjoerndalen.
3. he said that einar does NOT posses 'outstanding functional abilities' (perhaps he meant a mediocre engine).
kingjr said:OEB himself has said something similar in the past.
kingjr said:OEB himself has said something similar in the past.
He, with Elofsson, were the ones trying to follow Muhlegg in that infamous 30k in 2002. If you remove known dopers from the result list, he'll sit with a bronze. Mediocre engine much?Kokoso said:That's surprising considering how he was literally flying in the past. I remember him being able to pull huge chunks of time on anybody. Are others so lazy or what?
kosmonaut said:He, with Elofsson, were the ones trying to follow Muhlegg in that infamous 30k in 2002. If you remove known dopers from the result list, he'll sit with a bronze. Mediocre engine much?