Re:
There's no evidence that the athletes currently suspended tampered with their urine samples. It's all 'alleged' whereas Johaug failed an actual test.
Legkov's tests were negative:
http://news.sportbox.ru/Vidy_sporta/doping/spbnews_NI711495_Doping_proby_Legkova_s_OI_2014_dali_otricatelnyj_rezultat
http://wieschemann.eu/en/legkov-legt-berufung-beim-cas-ein-sportler-suendenboecke
Problems with the McLaren report:
https://www.rt.com/sport/375111-lawyer-ski-ban-wada/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/olympics/2017/02/03/mclaren-report-russian-state-sponsored-doping-contains-discrepancies/
kingjr said:+1 to what Discgear said
The reasoning should not be 'X got off, so Y should get off too' but rather 'Y got banned, which is good, so X should be banned too'.
There's no evidence that the athletes currently suspended tampered with their urine samples. It's all 'alleged' whereas Johaug failed an actual test.
Legkov's tests were negative:
http://news.sportbox.ru/Vidy_sporta/doping/spbnews_NI711495_Doping_proby_Legkova_s_OI_2014_dali_otricatelnyj_rezultat
http://wieschemann.eu/en/legkov-legt-berufung-beim-cas-ein-sportler-suendenboecke
Problems with the McLaren report:
https://www.rt.com/sport/375111-lawyer-ski-ban-wada/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/olympics/2017/02/03/mclaren-report-russian-state-sponsored-doping-contains-discrepancies/