The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
elapid said:A bit of topic, but current terminology really irks me. A "non-negative" should be called a "positive", just like a "person of interest" should be a "suspect". The media etc should stop the PC BS and call it as it is. Now I have had my vent, we can get back on topic.
elapid said:A bit of topic, but current terminology really irks me. A "non-negative" should be called a "positive", just like a "person of interest" should be a "suspect". The media etc should stop the PC BS and call it as it is. Now I have had my vent, we can get back on topic.
Bala Verde said:Using (formal) logic, an 'non-negative' is not the equivalent of a 'positive'.
Look at it like this, if something is 'not white', does that mean it's 'black'. No, because there is a whole range of colours in the palette that will be ignored or excluded from consideration. So when someone is 'non-negative' ie non-white that does not already imply he is 'positive' black. He has fallen in the grey zone, and just as someone said before, he has become a suspect.
What I don't understand is why they leak that someone is 'non-negative'. Why couldn't they wait till he was actually found positive, if that could actually be corroborated.
Bala Verde said:Using (formal) logic, an 'non-negative' is not the equivalent of a 'positive'.
Look at it like this, if something is 'not white', does that mean it's 'black'. No, because there is a whole range of colours in the palette that will be ignored or excluded from consideration. So when someone is 'non-negative' ie non-white that does not already imply he is 'positive' black. He has fallen in the grey zone, and just as someone said before, he has become a suspect.
.
whiteboytrash said:Why are you so stupid ?
Why do English speakers think that English is the only language and that everything is derived from that language ?
Because the rules of the UCI were originally based in French and German they have only recently using English.
The expression that something is "not" or "non" is very common. English has stolen such expressions. "I feel not good", meaning "I feel bad", but you don't want to say bad as you don't really feel bad you just "don't feel good". To say "I'm not feeling good but I'm not feeling bad" takes way to long to say so you say "good not". Simple.
In this case as only the A sample has been tested which was "positive" but the "positive" criteria hasn't been met until the B sample is also "positive". So what does it make this ? "Positive" ? No as the full conditions haven't been met. "Negative" ? No as again the conditions haven't been met. Therefore "not negative" and not positive but you want to accentuate the current condition - "non-negative".
French and German are more efficient languages than English which is full of "grey".
whiteboytrash said:Why are you so stupid ?
Why do English speakers think that English is the only language and that everything is derived from that language ?
whiteboytrash said:Because the rules of the UCI were originally based in French and German they have only recently using English.
The expression that something is "not" or "non" is very common. English has stolen such expressions. "I feel not good", meaning "I feel bad", but you don't want to say bad as you don't really feel bad you just "don't feel good". To say "I'm not feeling good but I'm not feeling bad" takes way to long to say so you say "good not". Simple.
In this case as only the A sample has been tested which was "positive" but the "positive" criteria hasn't been met until the B sample is also "positive". So what does it make this ? "Positive" ? No as the full conditions haven't been met. "Negative" ? No as again the conditions haven't been met. Therefore "not negative" and not positive but you want to accentuate the current condition - "non-negative".
whiteboytrash said:French and German are more efficient languages than English which is full of "grey".
pmcg76 said:We seem to have gone of track a bit with the whole language debate.
Anyhow, dont ask me why but I have always suspected Pfannberger, no actual facts or standout reasons why, but its something I always felt about the guy. Maybe its the fact he came through a small time Austrian team to become a good cyclist. I am always suspect of guys who I have never heard of on a small team and they then turn into a contender in major races.
bikepure said:What is the definition of a 'non- negative'
eg cheating bast@$D
fallen hero
http://www.bikepure.org
the future of cycle sport
Greg Johnson said:If this is the attitude of the self professed 'future of cycling', count me out. There is a current process in place which actually supports your cause. Perhaps not to the extent that you wish, but support it and use it as a base to build on.
Show it no respect and you'll receive the same.
Cheers
Greg Johnson
Gearoid said:He should be back for the Giro in 2011 by my guess. A couple of years rest will do him no harm - look at Basso. Shame on that Russian team anyway, they know full well the true story. Cycling is a lost sport!
greg johnson said:if this is the attitude of the self professed 'future of cycling', count me out. There is a current process in place which actually supports your cause. Perhaps not to the extent that you wish, but support it and use it as a base to build on.
Show it no respect and you'll receive the same.
Cheers
greg johnson