This isn't cycling really...but I am really enjoying learning about the languages and their genesis.
Great stuff!!
Great stuff!!
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
TRDean said:This isn't cycling really...but I am really enjoying learning about the languages and their genesis.
Great stuff!!
flyor64 said:1814...but it was only to be ceded to Sweden. The big date was 1905 I think, when Norway left Sweden and Sweden eventually recognized it later that same year. Followed shortly by Norway crowning it's first king...a prince from Denmark!
It's a very interesting history, especially to someone learning it later in life, and paints a picture of very close ties between the three countries (to a relative outsider it does anyway).
Maltiv, Hektoren, or any of the other Norwegians on the site can feel free to correct my discrepancies if they so desire
On the Nynorsk language, I've heard it's genesis was due to Bokmål being too similar to Danish. Interestingly enough, if one so chooses to write correspondence to the government in Nynorsk, the government is obliged to respond in Nynorsk....by law. I've heard it can take months to get a response...but you will get one and in the proper language! Not that I have a clue with Nynorsk.
hektoren said:As an import to Norway way back in the late 80's I'm hardly qualified. I'm born-and-bred British stock, with a personal preference for briar pipes, mulligatawny, real ale, roast beef, PG Wodehouse, Parkinson, the Goon Show, Battle-of-Britain museum, wog women and Spurs (not necessarily in that order). As my personal experience goes, any delay in governmental response in Norway will probably be down to a lack of efficiency rather than "bokmål/nynorsk" hand-wringing.
taiwan said:You what now?
maltiv said:Love this quote from EBH:
"I'm really bad at remembering names or [cycling] history. I know who Eddy Merckx is, and that he was really good, but I don't know his results.
"I love cycling. But I don't like watching it. When it's on TV I might watch the final, but I won't sit for hours. And I don't watch other sports. I've never had any heroes. I have just always loved doing it."
blackcat said:just temper the anti-doping line. Bound to be betrayed.
Hagen is about the most talented rider besides Contador in the peloton. I would like to see him keep on dropping one kg a year, and in 5 years ride GC. In the interim, go for green, and attempt to win all the doyennes. Big chance at San Remo. Feel sorry for Hendo, surely he felt he was gonna be the first choice for field sprints.
rhubroma said:Pretty much agree with this post.
I only know of him from the races he won on Italian broadcasts and what the Italian cycling comment crew has said about him, which is only about praise. A couple of thoughts, however:
I think he could possibly become this generations best classics man. None of the races, except, perhaps PR, is beyond his grasp. On the GC account, I'm less certain. In fact I have some reasonable doubts. And, leaving doping asside, there are two (and once three) young riders, basically in his age category, who have demonstrated superior class in the Grand Tours: obvioulsy AC, then Andy Schleck, and, thirdly, I would also say that controversial Ricardo Ricco.
Hagen needs to greatly improve his climbing skills to concievably have any chance in a three week event. And he'll never be better than AC in this discipline. Consequently, I think he's better off focusing on the classics. But as it has been said, the man will yet surprise us.
PS. He'd do well to demonstrate a least a bit of respect, if not genuine interest, for the past champions and history of this sport. It is making him quite rich and to not do so, is in poor taste.
rhubroma said:Pretty much agree with this post.
I only know of him from the races he won on Italian broadcasts and what the Italian cycling comment crew has said about him, which is only about praise. A couple of thoughts, however:
I think he could possibly become this generations best classics man. None of the races, except, perhaps PR, is beyond his grasp. On the GC account, I'm less certain. In fact I have some reasonable doubts. And, leaving doping asside, there are two (and once three) young riders, basically in his age category, who have demonstrated superior class in the Grand Tours: obvioulsy AC, then Andy Schleck, and, thirdly, I would also say that controversial Ricardo Ricco.
Hagen needs to greatly improve his climbing skills to concievably have any chance in a three week event. And he'll never be better than AC in this discipline. Consequently, I think he's better off focusing on the classics. But as it has been said, the man will yet surprise us.
PS. He'd do well to demonstrate a least a bit of respect, if not genuine interest, for the past champions and history of this sport. It is making him quite rich and to not do so, is in poor taste.
... well?taiwan said:What does he mean?
Skip Madness said:I don't see him winning a GT, but as others have said the shorter stage races should end up being well-suited to him, as well as a large number of the classics. I also see him being the cutest rider in the peloton for several years to come. He flashed me a grin on a climb at the Tour of Britain last year, and I've been under his spell ever since.
What do you mean "off-topic"?
As for "respect", the thing that is making him rich is riding his bike, not being able to recite facts about others who have ridden them. He's under no obligation to care about the achievements of Merckx or anyone else. It's not disrespectful to not know that, just as it's not disrespectful for me to not know about who has managed to claim the most unemployment benefit in Britain's history.
... well?
hektoren said:Edvald is a shy, timid, softspoken guy at the tender age of 22, from a rural backwater of a rural backwater country. He's thoroughly intrigued by what he can do on his bike, he's NOT media-savvy, still very much a work in progress, and just as the Romanian band Fanfare Ciocarlia play the way they do because scholared musicians haven't had a chance yet to say they can't play that way, he's still redefining his own limits. Reading up on cycling history, learning to pay "lip-service" where credit is due, because it's the clever back-slapping strategy that's expected, is somewhat out of his range, yet. And I rue the day that it will be. I said, earlier, that EBH is "Nature Boy". He is. Not an evil, scheming bone in his body. He's the real deal, the future of cycling.
blackcat said:think Roubaix is one of his perfect races, as he can finish in the velodrome. His chrono threshold shows his ability, and wont be disadvantaged on a flat parcours. Wins Gent Wevelgem riding away with one other. Can win Roubaix.
Until now it's mainly been the less gruelling the better. I don't see him winning Roubaix, just yet.gingerwallaceafro said:I know he's relatively untested, but I think he can win just about any flattish parcours he turns his mind to and certainly the more gruelling the better.
ingsve said:EBH has only had one season where he for the first time tested the spring classics so eventhough he won Gent.Wevelgem last year I think it will still take a season or two before he will be perfectly comfortable with these types of races. It's not like he's belgian and grew up on those roads...
ingsve said:EBH has only had one season where he for the first time tested the spring classics so eventhough he won Gent.Wevelgem last year I think it will still take a season or two before he will be perfectly comfortable with these types of races. It's not like he's belgian and grew up on those roads...