• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Enough Armchair Lance Bashing!

Page 5 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.
auscyclefan94 said:
Imagine...

If Lance tests positive or is found a cheat...
How crazy would this forum go!:eek:
Cyclingnews would go into meltdown...

If that ever happened I think there would be a lot more fallout than just a forum meltdown. The mainstream cycling ignorant US media would go apesh!t. To say nothing of the rest of the world media.
The way the UCI seems to protect him maybe that would bring them down as well.
Maybe it could be either the beginning or the end of pro cycling?
If LA were to go down he would fall a lot farther and faster than any other athlete just by virtue of the stance and public persona he has made.
 
Jun 18, 2009
1,086
1
0
Visit site
Hugh Januss said:
If that ever happened I think there would be a lot more fallout than just a forum meltdown. The mainstream cycling ignorant US media would go apesh!t. To say nothing of the rest of the world media.
The way the UCI seems to protect him maybe that would bring them down as well.
Maybe it could be either the beginning or the end of pro cycling?
If LA were to go down he would fall a lot farther and faster than any other athlete just by virtue of the stance and public persona he has made.

+1... agreed. I think the only way Armstrong's doping will ever really come out is if he goes into politics and runs against someone really powerful and well connected. The UCI won't so shit
 
Cobber said:
+1... agreed. I think the only way Armstrong's doping will ever really come out is if he goes into politics and runs against someone really powerful and well connected. The UCI won't so shit

That probably won't happen, as if he runs it will most likely be as a Republican and eveybody knows the Dems $uck at "dirty tricks".
 
Jun 18, 2009
1,086
1
0
Visit site
Hugh Januss said:
That probably won't happen, as if he runs it will most likely be as a Republican and eveybody knows the Dems $uck at "dirty tricks".

Yes.... but he will have to run tin the Republican primary! :eek:
 
Jun 26, 2009
269
0
0
Visit site
Hugh Januss said:
If that ever happened I think there would be a lot more fallout than just a forum meltdown. The mainstream cycling ignorant US media would go apesh!t. To say nothing of the rest of the world media.
The way the UCI seems to protect him maybe that would bring them down as well.
Maybe it could be either the beginning or the end of pro cycling?
If LA were to go down he would fall a lot farther and faster than any other athlete just by virtue of the stance and public persona he has made.

If LA ever returned a positive test it would do irrepairable damage to cycling. The UCI are not totally stupid. Sometimes its prudent to hide the flaws in order to protect the whole. Whether the lance haters like it or not, LA has taken cycling to a wider audience than what existed before him. Lets forget this psychotic obsession and move on.
 
Jun 16, 2009
19,654
2
0
Visit site
beroepsrenner said:
If LA ever returned a positive test it would do irrepairable damage to cycling. The UCI are not totally stupid. Sometimes its prudent to hide the flaws in order to protect the whole. Whether the lance haters like it or not, LA has taken cycling to a wider audience than what existed before him. Lets forget this psychotic obsession and move on.

If you don't punish the cheats then it punishes the riders who have riden clean and deserve the title or victory. It's double standards. If he's been cheating since 1999 he has fooled people into watching cycling not brought to a wider audience. it's not a psychotic obsession. Peopple believe that their is that much evidence against him so they want him to come to justice. I am not saying he's a cheat but i am saying that the evidence is stacked against him.
 
beroepsrenner said:
If LA ever returned a positive test it would do irrepairable damage to cycling. The UCI are not totally stupid. Sometimes its prudent to hide the flaws in order to protect the whole. Whether the lance haters like it or not, LA has taken cycling to a wider audience than what existed before him. Lets forget this psychotic obsession and move on.

Maybe it would and maybe it wouldn't. Maybe what pro cycling needs is to have the ba$tards all thrown out, and then start over.
Besides the only damage we are talking about is to pro cycling, cycling is riding your bike to work or the park. Pro cycling is the drug infested workplace that we are talking about here, it's best not to confuse them. Cycling will be ok even without pro cycling.

Edit: I should explain, by "the ba$tards" I mean all the corupt team directors, the UCI brass, the "doctors" (both gynecologists and phlebotomists) the testers who get it right maybe 10% of the time, but still make a good living doing it, and the riders who are probably the closest thing to innocent victims in the whole thing.
 
Jun 26, 2009
269
0
0
Visit site
Hugh Januss said:
Maybe it would and maybe it wouldn't. Maybe what pro cycling needs is to have the ba$tards all thrown out, and then start over.
Besides the only damage we are talking about is to pro cycling, cycling is riding your bike to work or the park. Pro cycling is the drug infested workplace that we are talking about here, it's best not to confuse them. Cycling will be ok even without pro cycling.

Edit: I should explain, by "the ba$tards" I mean all the corupt team directors, the UCI brass, the "doctors" (both gynecologists and phlebotomists) the testers who get it right maybe 10% of the time, but still make a good living doing it, and the riders who are probably the closest thing to innocent victims in the whole thing.

I'm not attempting to defend LA in any way. I'm not even interested in the speculative debate as whether he has or hasn't doped. Everyone can make up their own minds on that front. The fact is that so many people in the wider community who previously knew nothing of pro cycling have now become aware due to the Armstrong "story". I have met Australians who didnt even know pro cycling existed but they have heard of him. It would not surprise me if the UCI "manipulated" test results to protect certain high profile personalities to protect the image of the sport and IMO they would be crazy not to. Cutting off your nose to spite your face is not the answer to the problem. This thread is not even about doping.... it is about the mans personality which polarises peoples opinions of him to the point where his critics become so obsessed that they wont let it go and so perpetuate the problem. Forget about him and one day he will just be a name in the history books.
 
Mar 18, 2009
2,442
0
0
Visit site
beroepsrenner said:
I'm not attempting to defend LA in any way. I'm not even interested in the speculative debate as whether he has or hasn't doped. Everyone can make up their own minds on that front. The fact is that so many people in the wider community who previously knew nothing of pro cycling have now become aware due to the Armstrong "story". I have met Australians who didnt even know pro cycling existed but they have heard of him. It would not surprise me if the UCI "manipulated" test results to protect certain high profile personalities to protect the image of the sport and IMO they would be crazy not to. Cutting off your nose to spite your face is not the answer to the problem. This thread is not even about doping.... it is about the mans personality which polarises peoples opinions of him to the point where his critics become so obsessed that they wont let it go and so perpetuate the problem. Forget about him and one day he will just be a name in the history books.

I am hoping that day will come soon ... not always his fault, apart from the twittering, but the media are so Lance-centric that it gets to be maddening! I would much rather watch or listen to a race for the race's sake rather than know if Lance is in 124th position or if he just farted.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
elapid said:
I am hoping that day will come soon ... not always his fault, apart from the twittering, but the media are so Lance-centric that it gets to be maddening! I would much rather watch or listen to a race for the race's sake rather than know if Lance is in 124th position or if he just farted.

+1

I truly wish he would just go away.
 
Mar 18, 2009
1,003
0
0
Visit site
Has Armstrong really raised the profile of the sport as a whole? Bollox has he - the only profile he has raised, or indeed cares about raising, is his own. Any positive effect on the sport - by which I take it you mean those 3 weeks in July which, as we all know, are the only ones that matter in the entire calendar and the only ones to truly benefit from the 'Armstrong Effect' - is purely and entirely coincidental.

I'm sure the Etoile de Bessege, the Tour International de Poitou Charentes and the GP de Plouay amongst others are all well known to the average Armstrong fan
 
bianchigirl said:
Has Armstrong really raised the profile of the sport as a whole? Bollox has he -

I'm sure the Etoile de Bessege, the Tour International de Poitou Charentes and the GP de Plouay amongst others are all well known to the average Armstrong fan

As is now, the ENECO Tour. Can't see how turning a Pro Tour event into a sideshow for the Tour of Ireland is good for the sport, unless Armstrong becomes a sport in his own right.............seasonal, of course......
....a bit like the hunting season.:rolleyes:
 
Jun 26, 2009
269
0
0
Visit site
bianchigirl said:
Has Armstrong really raised the profile of the sport as a whole? Bollox has he - the only profile he has raised, or indeed cares about raising, is his own. Any positive effect on the sport - by which I take it you mean those 3 weeks in July which, as we all know, are the only ones that matter in the entire calendar and the only ones to truly benefit from the 'Armstrong Effect' - is purely and entirely coincidental.

I'm sure the Etoile de Bessege, the Tour International de Poitou Charentes and the GP de Plouay amongst others are all well known to the average Armstrong fan

Here's another one.... so obsessed with their hatred that they actually perpetuate the effect. There is a lot more to road racing than 1 man and a lot more than just the TDF. I didnt say he had a positive effect on the sport. The media frenzy that surrounds him has made people aware of pro cycling that werent before. Whether we like it or not he is an icon of the sport and to continually debate it is a waste of intellect. So forget about him.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
beroepsrenner said:
Here's another one.... so obsessed with their hatred that they actually perpetuate the effect. There is a lot more to road racing than 1 man and a lot more than just the TDF. I didnt say he had a positive effect on the sport. The media frenzy that surrounds him has made people aware of pro cycling that werent before. Whether we like it or not he is an icon of the sport and to continually debate it is a waste of intellect. So forget about him.

I am not debating anything. He is a prick who deserves nothing but scorn. No debate about it. Icon? So what?

Here is a question for you. If talking about Armstrong is pointless, what is talking about people who talk about Armstrong? Don't answer, I already know.
 
Jun 26, 2009
269
0
0
Visit site
Thoughtforfood said:
I am not debating anything. He is a prick who deserves nothing but scorn. No debate about it. Icon? So what?

Here is a question for you. If talking about Armstrong is pointless, what is talking about people who talk about Armstrong? Don't answer, I already know.

I am just so sick of every second thread on this forum talking about armstrong. :mad:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
beroepsrenner said:
I am just so sick of every second thread on this forum talking about armstrong. :mad:

I can understand that. At the same time, since he is an "icon" and in fact, at this time still THE "icon," doesn't it make a bit of sense? Take into account the fact that this is primarily an English speaking forum, and the amount of coverage he gets in the press as well as on twitter, and if really makes sense. I say this not as a smartass, but honestly. Just avoid the threads. There is a great stage going on at the Eneco Tour RIGHT NOW. Go to cycling TV and watch and discuss it on the thread for that. IT is a great stage today, really.
 
Jun 18, 2009
1,086
1
0
Visit site
beroepsrenner said:
Here's another one.... so obsessed with their hatred that they actually perpetuate the effect. There is a lot more to road racing than 1 man and a lot more than just the TDF. I didnt say he had a positive effect on the sport. The media frenzy that surrounds him has made people aware of pro cycling that werent before. Whether we like it or not he is an icon of the sport and to continually debate it is a waste of intellect. So forget about him.

These are the same people that come onto these forums and make them unreadable. A true fan of the sport is a fan of the sport, not just a man.The sport would be better off without them if you ask me!
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Cobber said:
These are the same people that come onto these forums and make them unreadable. A true fan of the sport is a fan of the sport, not just a man.The sport would be better off without them if you ask me!

Excellent point. Notice how there are at least 50 of them who (a month after the tour is over) are not posting anymore?
 
Yes.....Isn't that the race with that other American guy in? You know, the one that's won his 3rd stage, today and is leading the GC?
Tyler Hamilton, I think his name is.........or maybe Farrar.:rolleyes:

Yes, it was a good stage, even if it ended up in the usual sprint finish.

Thank goodness for RTBF Sat, since Euroshiite have dumped this race, in favour of a half an hour of Mr Profile Raiser.

Thoughtforfood said:
Excellent point. Notice how there are at least 50 of them who (a month after the tour is over) are not posting anymore?
Seemed like more, at the time...
 
Jul 22, 2009
3,355
1
0
Visit site
Hugh Januss said:
Maybe it would and maybe it wouldn't. Maybe what pro cycling needs is to have the ba$tards all thrown out, and then start over.
Besides the only damage we are talking about is to pro cycling, cycling is riding your bike to work or the park. Pro cycling is the drug infested workplace that we are talking about here, it's best not to confuse them. Cycling will be ok even without pro cycling.

Edit: I should explain, by "the ba$tards" I mean all the corupt team directors, the UCI brass, the "doctors" (both gynecologists and phlebotomists) the testers who get it right maybe 10% of the time, but still make a good living doing it, and the riders who are probably the closest thing to innocent victims in the whole thing.
Great post. I agree 100%
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
Visit site
Hugh Januss said:
Maybe it would and maybe it wouldn't. Maybe what pro cycling needs is to have the ba$tards all thrown out, and then start over.
.....

Edit: I should explain, by "the ba$tards" I mean all the corupt team directors, the UCI brass, the "doctors" (both gynecologists and phlebotomists) the testers who get it right maybe 10% of the time, but still make a good living doing it, and the riders who are probably the closest thing to innocent victims in the whole thing.

Oh no - does that include me? ...but the UCI medical committee gave me a clean bill of health....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.