Ferminal said:
djpbaltimore said:
The humorous part is that one of the comments from that thread about Sassi is "He's no Ferrari." Another is "I have not heard anything good or bad about the centre except that Sassi is looked at as anti-doping."
Eh, not sure the context of my comments, but his results certainly don't make him a Ferrari... I think at best Sassi wasn't involved but was fully aware of what his riders did, at worst he was a typical enabler. Can't exactly remember but I think it was the "being holy with Ivan" type of story which introduced doubt for me.
chicken dinner right here.
To me, from what I've read, Sassi's program, his expertise, was to provide state of the art internal testing.
He could guarantee you'd never piss positive.
In addition, I find it hard to believe he wasn't involved in organizing the team-wide doping at Mapei as reported by ARD, although, admittedly, one can give Sassi the benefit of the doubt there and assume he merely turned a blind eye.
Anyhow, the fact that someone like Shayne Bannan turned to Sassi in 2004 speaks volumes.
Bannan would have had one thing only on his mind: get results no matter how.
That alliance most certainly wasn't about racing clean.
As for the other top dogs Sassi later worked with: all they can be argued to have cared about is how to fly below the radar.