Neworld said:
ScienceIsCool said:
"
“He said, ‘I am clean, I am sure of it.’ He said that but I could not understand how he did what he did. I said, ‘Maybe it is clear for you, but it is not for me. And I prefer to sleep well.’"
http://www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/news/aldo-sassi-the-philosophy-of-coaching-1349#mpVfbjfmFBJ3hxek.99
All I'm asking is a reference source to a doping scandal or someone outing him as a facilitator of doping or whatnot. Since he's worked with known dopers, yeah we should ask if he's dirty! He might well be. But you also have to realize that a cycling coach will coach cyclists... Not all of them are going to be clean.
John Swanson
Not to be adversarial John, but you seek 'references' and scientific facts to be presented to support commentary, yet you offer up an article about Sassi which is basically Sassi's personal comments on how he is clean blah blah blah. Very Johan B-like hyperbole. Try to present some facts as well please.
As for my initial unfounded, and they are I agree, comments...they were wrt Cadel and the original CN article from earlier this week.
I find it completely disingenuous to believe, even for a second, that at the height of sophisticate doping, on all the doping teams that Cadel was a member, with Tony Rominger as a mentor, Jim Och. as president and manager, while battling with all GC winners, and eventually winning the TdF himself, not to mention all the other fake honourable wins like TdRomandie...that Cadel is anything but a tainted rider.
As for the necessary provision of facts to back it up, there are very few facts available on the internet, in CN Clinic forums or elsewhere to book Mr. Evans. Like most doping, one needs to connect the dots unless someone is so stupid to let themselves get caught.
Good post. All common sense really.
-
You don't present claims of cleanliness from the horses mouth as fact.
- Until evidence to the contrary surfaces, there is no reason to assume there were many clean riders in the peloton in the period in which Cadel was active. And whilst there may have been a couple, how likely are they to have become GT winners? It would be against all odds.
But fair game to John. If you believe Lemond did it on paniagua, it would be a bit hypocritical to claim Cadel couldn't do it on paniagua.
As for those links you provided earlier, I think they still count as some of the most convincing reallife examples of the phenomenon known as roid rage. The way Cadel went from a tender, lean athlete, to a bulky English fullback always seemed suspicious, especially seeing him climb with the best despite that added muscle weight.
Whether that was steroids or HGH, or a combo, we will likely never know. EPO in any case.
Digger (or Vayerims, not sure) had an interesting tweet on Cadel too. Allegedly Cuddles was closer to Ferrari than he alleges to have been.
Someone on Twitter commented Cadel likely pioneered helium doping, judging on his voice.