It doesn't.Indeed. And unlike what some argued then, the transfer does make a lot of sense.
Roglic is a big underdog at ineos vs Pog and Vingegaard. Doesn't make sense for Ineos to spend massive money on a 33 year old underdog.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
It doesn't.Indeed. And unlike what some argued then, the transfer does make a lot of sense.
Also, early season Rog (for grand tours) is good because he's had fewer opportunities to crash and get banged up.A teeny-weeny bit of Twitter stalking shows Roglič "liked" marko baloh's tweet in response to the opening Giro ITT profile:
Made for Rogla indeed.
So Giro attempt incoming? It would be an exciting change of scenery for next season, for sure.
A teeny-weeny bit of Twitter stalking shows Roglič "liked" marko baloh's tweet in response to the opening Giro ITT profile:
Made for Rogla indeed.
So Giro attempt incoming? It would be an exciting change of scenery for next season, for sure.
I hope so, that would be great. Maybe it's time for Italy next year... Tirreno - Adriatico, double Giro - Tour and Il Lombardia.So Giro attempt incoming? It would be an exciting change of scenery for next season, for sure.
NIbali is closest since 2008 Contador to do the Giro/Vuelta double. He missed it by 37 seconds in 2013.Like I said before, I would love to see him go for the Giro. This uber TDF focus had become quite annoying and he has unfinished business left in Italy as well.
And after doing a good Giro there's still half a season left, so who knows? In 2019 he still got the closest since 2008 Contador to do the Giro/Vuelta double and 2020 showed that he can also do two great GT's in a row. So the prospect of him potentially showing up at the Tour with no pressure after winning the Giro sounds great to me.
Also Aru was closer in both time and position. And I'd argue Yates was closer in perception.NIbali is closest since 2008 Contador to do the Giro/Vuelta double. He missed it by 37 seconds in 2013.
I was thinking that too but I didn't want to become one of those people who mention my favourite rider in every single rambling post.NIbali is closest since 2008 Contador to do the Giro/Vuelta double. He missed it by 37 seconds in 2013.
Aru wasn't closer in any subjective or objective metric?Also Aru was closer in both time and position. And I'd argue Yates was closer in perception.
Aru won Vuelta and 2nd in Giro on 1:53 in 2016Aru wasn't closer in any subjective or objective metric?
Ah I missed that it was compared to Rog I thought it meant Aru closer than Nibali.Aru won Vuelta and 2nd in Giro on 1:53 in 2016
Roglic won Vuelta and barely got 3rd in Giro on 2:30 in 2019.
What are you talking about?
Closer in perception? HahahAlso Aru was closer in both time and position. And I'd argue Yates was closer in perception.
True, but that wasn't the subject.Closer in perception? Hahah
In perception, Rogla has Tour&Vuelta double covered…
I know. I’m just pointing out that “in perception” is a useless category… if “in perception” was a thing, Roglic would be TDF winnerTrue, but that wasn't the subject.
I don't think think it's a useless category at all if you're looking for how close a rider came to a victory. I believe we both agree Roglic came much closer to TdF victory in 2020 than Uran in 2017, although the latter finished closer to 1st place in final GC.I know. I’m just pointing out that “in perception” is a useless category… if “in perception” was a thing, Roglic would be TDF winner
Primoz looks like an ET among people here.
When you accidentally travel to medieval times in your lycra clothing.
Late transition.Translation