Teams & Riders Everybody needs a little bit of Roglstomp in their lives

Page 408 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Rogla is extremely fit. And on stage 1 he in my opinion did a rather good result on such route. Normally he would be around 20s behind Remco. But it looks like Remco exaggerated a bit. Likely he is not all that confident about week 3. Hence he will give all he has for the first two TTs. Still Remco is now ahead, by a rather large margin, and Rogla will need to tackle it eventually. Stage 9 should be another good benchmark. Now we all expect for Remco to be around 2 minutes ahead. After the stage 9. But who knows what will really happens. We'll see.
 
So Evenepoel and Almeida watching each other and Roglič doing a Carapaz. Considering how far back Roglič is. Nobody will pay special attention to him anyway.

Remco will never allow that freedom to Roglič especially after Catalonia and neither will Almeida.

Roglič is a three time Vuelta winner so of course he won't be treated in the same manner of a rider that wasn't even the main leader of his team back in 2019.
 
Weak argument. Losing time to hart and almeida? Not normal. He is a better TT than these two.
Weak argument. You don't see all three UAE riders performing much better than expected? Clearly their new setup is working for them and they have been working on TT. It is Almeida and Hart who over performed here. Not the other way around, and you can use riders as Ganna and Küng, two specialists made for flat TT's, as the benchmark, as this was a major goal for them and they are two of the most constant performers in TT's, unlike GC riders who peak for major GC races.
 
Weak argument. You don't see all three UAE riders performing much better than expected? Clearly their new setup is working for them and they have been working on TT. It is Almeida and Hart who over performed here. Not the other way around, and you can use riders as Ganna and Küng, two specialists made for flat TT's, as the benchmark, as this was a major goal for them and they are two of the most constant performers in TT's, unlike GC riders who peak for major GC races.
Two things can be true at the same time. TGH and UAE performed above expectations and Roglič underperformed a bit.
 
Someone was posting his results from 2019 Giro. Do we have any info about W/kg from then and now? Or his W/kg from more recent (short) TTs? Just to get a feel, obviously many things have changed since then (age, the stage in which the TT was run, etc, etc).
 
Watching the first highlights of the Stage 2, pre-sprint crash it looks like 3 JV guys just missing a nasty crash. Was Roglic the last guy in that line?

View: https://twitter.com/procyclinglover/status/1655247589879455750


It happened right on Rog's tail.

The same thing happened at the Vuelta 2021 as well in one of the first stages (a crash behind with a wayward bike almost clipping Rog's back wheel, I seem to remember).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Indeed. Both of them are very lucky this didn't ended badly for them.

(in which case Grooves would have gotten two groups of fanboys on him)

I'm totally biased on this topic but I'm absolutely fine with Evenepoel criticizing Groves.

It's a sensitive topic for some (literally this thread still has embers burning from 'the' incident last September) but I've long held the opinion sprinters & sprinter teams need to GTFO when GC favorites are in their way. Aka just be careful, i.e. that should be the mantra. Until the UCI does something to ensure the final km's aren't an insta kill against GC riders in the event of a crash, context matters. That's because despite the fact everyone can go for the stage (& many people will take issue with GC riders even being at the front), these guys like Groves need to pay attention to 'who' they're riding past.

Because in the scheme of things, GC is way, way more important in a GT than anyone's (especially a sprinter) stage aspirations. It's just the way it is. And that context matters way more than the minutiae of the incident regarding who moved over, deviated or is technically at fault.
 
I'm totally biased on this topic but I'm absolutely fine with Evenepoel criticizing Groves.

It's a sensitive topic for some (literally this thread still has embers burning from 'the' incident last September) but I've long held the opinion sprinters & sprinter teams need to GTFO when GC favorites are in their way. Aka just be careful, i.e. that should be the mantra. Until the UCI does something to ensure the final km's aren't an insta kill against GC riders in the event of a crash, context matters. That's because despite the fact everyone can go for the stage (& many people will take issue with GC riders even being at the front), these guys like Groves need to pay attention to 'who' they're riding past.

Because in the scheme of things, GC is way, way more important in a GT than anyone's (especially a sprinter) stage aspirations. It's just the way it is. And that context matters way more than the minutiae of the incident regarding who moved over, deviated or is technically at fault.
Oh no, i'm totally fine with it as well, seeing the images. (Also not really unbiased :D)

And i was indeed referring to the other incident where that rider was also called names. Hence my remark that Groves would have 2 groups over him (instead of 1). (Rightfully or not)

When we talk about the 3K rule maybe they should increase it a bit more? Since 3k is already part of the positionning which now also includes the GC teams. Maybe 5K out would be better for most of the sprinter stages. (When the GC rider wants to participate in the sprint its another matter)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rackham
Watching the first highlights of the Stage 2, pre-sprint crash it looks like 3 JV guys just missing a nasty crash. Was Roglic the last guy in that line?
No, he was in the middle of the jumbo train. (he's low profile on the drops)

Screenshot-20230507-222018.png