@bNator
We had long discussion about this and i feel that this should really be settled now. For the ones that actually want it to be settled.
What should have happened instead is Wright should have used the brakes and Rogla, if Wright felt this would be an appropriate action, to make an appeal after the race and to get Rogla relegated.
People claiming otherwise IMHO don't really want it to settle. And tend to came up with some sci-fi alternatives, purely for entertaining purposes.
As for Rogla and crashes and keeping out of trouble. Well, good luck with that, it's impossible. For Rogla or any other rider involved in the pro peloton. So governing bodies really should start implementing injury preventing measures. This area was neglected in the past 100 years or so. Helmet basically being the only positive story in regards to injury prevention measure taken that made a huge difference.
Anyway, somehow even if Rogla decides to ride at the back of the bunch, Tour 2025, on the exposed sections, that still isn't any real guarantee, for a crash and an injury not to affect the outcome. And that is true for Rogla and the rest of the bunch. So best not to expect from Rogla, to be some kind of superman, for him to individually resolve much here. Riding at front, belly, back ... You can easily get injured and that doesn't apply only for Rogla. Lets not forget big 3 out of 4 basically came to the Tour 2024 out of a hospital.
So, Rogla, just be Rogla. Control what you can control and let the fans worry about the rest. On how supposedly an individual rider can control all that much if to get injured or not on some race. Basically all of Rogličes crashes at the Tour from 2021 and onwards were out of his control. It was some other action that triggered it, Rogla was just there. Saying that well, Rogla could have done something about it, for not be there. Sure. He shouldn't have been at the front, middle or at the back ... Jeez.