I think he still looks good for the win. He’s doing what he needs to and seemingly doing it using the minimum effort. Unlike others who are killing themselves to get back in contention.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Son of Amsterhammer said:I think he still looks good for the win. He’s doing what he needs to and seemingly doing it using the minimum effort. Unlike others who are killing themselves to get back in contention.
Rollthedice said:I see that not only Nibali but also his fans are getting a fixation on Roglic. It's getting creepy.
Red Rick said:Also, going to the Tour is such a waste for Roglic. He would be the huge, HUGE favorite for the Vuelta.
Carols said:Rollthedice said:I see that not only Nibali but also his fans are getting a fixation on Roglic. It's getting creepy.
I've had a fixation on him since last year . Sometimes a rider just causes your heart to beat faster. Nibs did it for me 10 years ago and I've stuck by him. But Primoz captured me last year, he's just #2, like Nibs used to be #2 to Alberto, and Valverde has been #3 for well over a decade. It's okay to be a fan of more than 1 rider .
Pantani_lives said:What bothers me about Roglic is his sudden change of racing attitude. He's normally a quite agressive rider who's not afraid to take initiative. Think of his two solo stage wins in the Tour. But now that there's a GC win at stake he suddenly turns into this ultranegative rider who refuses to take a lead in the final, even when good climbers are taking a lot of time back. I wonder if this was his own decision or if he was following tactical advice from his team directors.
He might still win this Giro if he can control Carapaz, but his chances are certainly diminished by this all too passive attitude.
topt said:Pantani_lives said:What bothers me about Roglic is his sudden change of racing attitude. He's normally a quite agressive rider who's not afraid to take initiative. Think of his two solo stage wins in the Tour. But now that there's a GC win at stake he suddenly turns into this ultranegative rider who refuses to take a lead in the final, even when good climbers are taking a lot of time back. I wonder if this was his own decision or if he was following tactical advice from his team directors.
He might still win this Giro if he can control Carapaz, but his chances are certainly diminished by this all too passive attitude.
He is doing what they are telling him over the radio. He could have caught Carapaz on the downhill but then he let it go
Pantani_lives said:What bothers me about Roglic is his sudden change of racing attitude. He's normally a quite agressive rider who's not afraid to take initiative. Think of his two solo stage wins in the Tour. But now that there's a GC win at stake he suddenly turns into this ultranegative rider who refuses to take a lead in the final, even when good climbers are taking a lot of time back. I wonder if this was his own decision or if he was following tactical advice from his team directors.
He might still win this Giro if he can control Carapaz, but his chances are certainly diminished by this all too passive attitude.
Red Rick said:Even in the Pyrenees he had trouble sustaining his accelerations. He had trouble with the ITT due to a crash before the Tour, but I don't think he's made for the super long and super hard days.
I think we have to keep in mind for Mende that the peloton lost like 20 minutes to the break that day. They'd taken it super easy so they climbed it with very fresh legs. Roglic is an anaerobic beast but in classics the length of the race might be a problem for him. He's basically the polar opposite of Nibali.
Rollthedice said:I see that not only Nibali but also his fans are getting a fixation on Roglic. It's getting creepy.
Rollthedice said:sky jumper