Let's hope he recovers quickly and avoids any feta accidents.
Same can certainly be said for Extinctions statements as if they are fact, LMAO. He obviously doesn't follow Rogla's own updates on other media the way some of us do.
Rogla was certainly NOT "He was in excellent shape" as stated for whatever Extinctions motives are. He was Off the bike for weeks and had a very short time on the bike to prep.
But you must consider the distinct possiblity that the stated severity of his Tour injuries was inflated at the time; that is the team preserved him whilst still useful at the Tour to then bulf for the Vuelta. How else can his win on stage four be explained?! I mean, come on. In any case, why should Roglic or JV have invested in him any more at the Tour when Vingegaard was clearly in control?Roglic certainly didn't have a good prepararion, but somehow he does show up with good enough form to fight for GC which is just crazy. His base is so good, amazing.
On the other hand, the Sierra Nevada stage showed that he wasn't growing stronger than Evenepoel and that Evenepoel was not fading, as many people assumed, but that the stage prior was simply due to his crash.
Does this seem fair to everybody? I think it seems fair. And i also think that's how it was.
Evenepoel got Roglstomped on stage 15. Just get over it.
Roglic certainly didn't have a good prepararion, but somehow he does show up with good enough form to fight for GC which is just crazy. His base is so good, amazing.
Are you serious or just trolling? Roglic only gained on stage 15 because Evenepoel was hurting from the crash, but go on.Evenepoel got Roglstomped on stage 15. Just get over it.
P.S. What Evenepoel was capable of doing is he survived the full blown attack at the being of the ultimate climb. On the hardest section. That is fair to say.
Not after the Movistar waste of energy today. Much thrashing for a meh counter by Mas.![]()
Of course it's still a possibility that Mas is actually the tortoise in this story.
![]()
Of course it's still a possibility that Mas is actually the tortoise in this story.
It was perfectly suited to him, didn’t require a major aerobic effort that might need more of a base, and the competition for that type of stage was incredibly week. Remco had terrible positioning. Roglic handled it perfectly.But you must consider the distinct possiblity that the stated severity of his Tour injuries was inflated at the time; that is the team reserved him whilst still useful at the Tour to then bulf for the Vuelta. How else can his win on stage four be explained?! I mean, come on.
So Roglic was not impacted by his severe crash in the Tour and then a month of recovery, but Remco was affected by his crash? I would argue both were likely affected but there is also precedence for people crashing as badly or worse than Remco and going on to win the GT so the our losing time anywhere and for someone to crash out of the Tour and go on to win the Vuelta. So I dunno guess this is just a waste of time.Are you serious or just trolling? Roglic only gained on stage 15 because Evenepoel was hurting from the crash, but go on.
Stage 4 wasn't even a VO2 max effort, and a pretty lacklustre field for a 1km 9% finishBut you must consider the distinct possiblity that the stated severity of his Tour injuries was inflated at the time; that is the team reserved him whilst still useful at the Tour to then bulf for the Vuelta. How else can his win on stage four be explained?! I mean, come on. In any case, why should Roglic nor JV have invested in him any more at the Tour when Vingegaard was clearly in control?
I don't think Roglic's Tour crash is relevant to Remco's at the Vuelta in terms of actual impact on performance during stage 15.It was perfectly suited to him, didn’t require a major aerobic effort that might need more of a base, and the competition for that type of stage was incredibly week. Remco had terrible positioning. Roglic handled it perfectly.
So Roglic was not impacted by his severe crash in the Tour and then a month of recovery, but Remco was affected by his crash? I would argue both were likely affected but there is also precedence for people crashing as badly or worse than Remco and going on to win the GT so the our losing time anywhere and for someone to crash out of the Tour and go on to win the Vuelta. So I dunno guess this is just a waste of time.
But the only riders that have a fighting chance at beating that Roglic on that finish are MAYBE a top shape Alaphilippe or Pogacar. So, no, the field wasn't weak and let's not forget that a World Tour Vuelta isn't inferior to the form of those at the Tour, only the pressure is different.Stage 4 wasn't even a VO2 max effort, and a pretty lacklustre field for a 1km 9% finish
I could not care less about whether or not Roglic bases his whole preparation on the Vuelta. It is his and his team's choice. The only thing that matters is current form and his was quite high. End of story. Could it have been higher? Perhaps, but anything else is mere speculation. If this puts me in the ridiculous category, then we can wait and see over the next years. But don't come back crying, but IF Roglic hadn't fallen in the Tour he'd have won this Vuelta. And Roglstomp has unfortunately usually been victim to getting stomped, one way or another.@Extinction
As there was some discussion about preparation. And you seem to far stretch it even further. The fact is Evenepoel preparing for Vuelta through the whole year. Last three months or so intensively. Doing the altitude trainings. And Roglič, although his base is high, training for like 14 days in subpar conditions. Claiming this doesn't matter like at all. And then wondering why you are not taken seriously.
Bottom line. If in the end even @Logic-is-your-friend can cope with it. With a bit of Roglstomp in the life. You will manage too.
Anyone is free to focus on the cyclist of choice, even if your wording isn't entirely clear. And I've admired the Slovenian, even having always been perplexed that not one but two phenomenons come out of a country with no more than 2 million people and not a rich cycling heritage. The Fates evidently work wonders.@Extinction
For sure.
P.S. In my opinion better to no go focus on cyclist such as Mas and the youngsters.
![]()
Of course it's still a possibility that Mas is actually the tortoise in this story.
It hurts that small country with "no cycling heritage" produces 2 guys that kick ass all Belgium guys year after year. You are so salty that it's already pathetic.Anyone is free to focus on the cyclist of choice, even if your wording isn't entirely clear. And I've admired the Slovenian, even having always been perplexed that not one but two phenomenons come out of a country with no more than 2 million people and not a rich cycling heritage. The Fates evidently work wonders.
You gotta admit that the tortoise DOES look like him.