Teams & Riders Everybody needs a little bit of Roglstomp in their lives

Page 838 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Rogla was the leader for years. Then he was co-leader. Then Jonas got better. You can't say he was treated badly. He got his chances, he didn't win. Admittedly bad luck had a lot to do with it. But also one time because of a very bad TT.
In my opinion it's all good. Jonas got better, and I totally understand Roglic moved teams.
I just very much disagree with the narrative that he got treated badly.
Yes and no.

Roglic asked for Tour leadership in 2019 and Jumbo went "Lol Groenewegen it is"
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sandisfan
What's love got to do with it?

A casual Rogla fan will tell you you have to look at it with your heart, otherwise you are doing it wrong. It's the heart, on what got us all here in the first place. It was always about full range of emotions and not spreadsheets. Faith is something i see you lack too. Try it out sometimes. Stuff the champions are made of. And boy is Rogla a true champion.
 
He's taking a very important step towards not crashing out of the Tour:
Not riding Dauphine.
As has been previously discussed, the winner of Dauphine tends to either win the Tour... or crash out of the Tour (or simply just be very anonymous).
Roglic has crashed out of the last 3 Tours he started.
By not riding Dauphine, he ensures that he won't accidentally "do a Fuglsang", and ride away to the win while the main rivals are looking at each other.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CyclistAbi
So basically one could objectively say that Rogla wasn't a Tour team leader anymore, for years, and now he is a Tour team leader again? Or what am i missing here if that is not the case?
Yes, you could very well objectively say that. And you'd be right.
But I was arguing he didn't get treated badly. Someone just got better than him at that particular team, for that particular goal (Tour). No harm, no foul.
 
  • Like
Reactions: red_flanders
Yes, you could very well objectively say that. And you'd be right.
But I was arguing he didn't get treated badly. Someone just got better than him at that particular team, for that particular goal (Tour). No harm, no foul.
Well what is the definition of "for years" ?

In 22 Jumbo had to find a way to beat Pogi and when with a classic multi leader strategy after Jonas was superior on Ventoux in 21. In 23 you can't really go without the winner, so Rog did Giro/Vuelta. That's it, all 100% natural. If this is "for years" then i'm just wired differently.
 
Yes, you could very well objectively say that. And you'd be right.

OK.

But I was arguing he didn't get treated badly. Someone just got better than him at that particular team, for that particular goal (Tour). No harm, no foul.

Fair enough, relationships change. Still, going into the Tour 2025, as a team lead riding for Red Bull – BORA – hansgrohe, main objective for you and the supporting team being to beat all that supposedly better GT performers. No harm, no foul.
 
Well what is the definition of "for years" ?

In 22 Jumbo had to find a way to beat Pogi and when with a classic multi leader strategy after Jonas was superior on Ventoux in 21. In 23 you can't really go without the winner, so Rog did Giro/Vuelta. That's it, all 100% natural. If this is "for years" then i'm just wired differently.
Yeah, I kinda read over that and it was a bit of a hyperbole. I was agreeing in general that he was a leader, then not, and now is the leader again at Borah.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kn0s