Floyd to be charged with fraud

Page 17 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Sep 5, 2009
1,239
0
0
Glenn_Wilson said:
It was just a joke. Now about the Floyd Fraud stuff....maybe patrick does Knot NO anything about that? :D

I still have a feeling the fed's are trying to determine if the fund was used just for defense. Just my opinion.

You mean like Livestrong?

Deceiving donors that contributions go to funding cancer research but instead go to "survivorship" and "global awareness", cutting deals with Livestrong assets to enrich its founder and expending millions for an international knees up to market its founder immediately after his Comeback 2.0 TdF (the script was that he was supposed to win that TdF but Contador spoiled his Irish knees up party).

You may be right on Floyd and his close supporters being suspected of using the FFF funds for purposes other than the mission statement. That would be a legitimate pursuit by the Feds of misrepresenting donors to obtain contributions.

You should put it to Markvw. He is omniscient on all issues.
 
Oct 25, 2010
3,049
2
0
Velodude said:
That is all BS.

Don't these journalists know that Landis is as poor as a church mouse to fund legal defenses and appeals? :)

He shoulda put his TDF trophy on eBay instead of smashing it. But if he'd done that, Lance would have bought it and turned it into a dog dish.
 
Mar 17, 2009
2,295
0
0
Dr. Maserati said:
Of course it does- as it might cloud the issue, in the cold light of day.
So don't go raining on his parade, this is snow joke.

glad to see someone has a cents of humor about it all

Digger said:
Or maybe you'd care to speak about Floyd being charged with fraud.

isn't 40 pages of blather on the subject enough?
 
Mar 17, 2009
2,295
0
0
Glenn_Wilson said:
It was just a joke. Now about the Floyd Fraud stuff....maybe patrick does Knot NO anything about that? :D

I still have a feeling the fed's are trying to determine if the fund was used just for defense. Just my opinion.

maybe he bought beer with it
 
May 10, 2009
4,640
10
15,495
patricknd said:
glad to see someone has a cents of humor about it all



isn't 40 pages of blather on the subject enough?

Or isn't over 1200 posts acting a moron, whilst adding nothing substantive to any argument, enough?
 
May 10, 2009
4,640
10
15,495
thehog said:
Although this is the Floyd thread I’m the Hog and have latitude.

The SCA case has always be the great mysteries to me. This is why I have the Nov back door theory going on. You’d think now the Federal Investigation into Armstrong has been dropped that SCA would start to look at their options. They’re not a big company so to part ways with 7 million was a big dent. Something doesn’t smell right. That’s why there’s so much irony in all of this. If one man can lie to gain money at the SCA arbitration (and accept it) and not be charged then another raised donations to support his appeal is charged seems strange to me. Something is not adding up.

Maybe just me being crazy.

Hog make room for messages your inbox is full.
 
May 10, 2009
4,640
10
15,495
patricknd said:
Don't sell yourself short, you have almost 1800 :D

Vast majority of my posts stay on point and provide evidence...have never been banned or had an infringement...you on the other hand...
 
Mar 17, 2009
2,295
0
0
Digger said:
Vast majority of my posts stay on point and provide evidence...have never been banned or had an infringement...you on the other hand...

I on the other hand, have fun. Were you a hall monitor? :D

And on topic, Floyd hasn't told the whole truth
 
Feb 4, 2010
547
0
0
Velodude said:
That is all BS.

Don't these journalists know that Landis is as poor as a church mouse to fund legal defenses and appeals? :)

Well there are sources and there are sources. Maybe the "sources" are exclusive to CN and all the other outlets only have sources.

Stuff like this is really important when you're talking about mountains of evidence.
 
May 26, 2009
460
0
0
Agree with Particknd’s , comment#404 , this thread is “ full of blather ” , when it is not attacking the children of the man you choose to hate !

Jealousy on this thread has reached new depths of depravity and it is UNBELIEVABLE that the “ Moderators ” choose to continue to allow these people free rein to vent their scurrilous , depraved and fictionist imaginings on the rest of us readers !

Time Moderators took note of the IP addresses of these miserable excuses for humanity and barred them from inflicting their worthless imaginings on the rest of humanity !

Copy of a Bruyneel tweet about 12hrs ago :

JohanBruyneel‏@JohanBruyneel
Discovered there's the massive amount of about 200 twitter cycling trolls, and they're all connected to each other. I'm feeling for them...

The guy was being kind !
 
May 10, 2009
4,640
10
15,495
skippy said:
Agree with Particknd’s , comment#404 , this thread is “ full of blather ” , when it is not attacking the children of the man you choose to hate !

Jealousy on this thread has reached new depths of depravity and it is UNBELIEVABLE that the “ Moderators ” choose to continue to allow these people free rein to vent their sculirious , depraved and fictionist imaginings on the rest of us readers !

Time Moderators took note of the IP addresses of these miserable excuses for humanity and barred them from inflicting their worthless imaginings on the rest of humanity !Copy of a Bruyneel tweet about 12hrs ago :

JohanBruyneel‏@JohanBruyneel
Discovered there's the massive amount of about 200 twitter cycling trolls, and they're all connected to each other. I'm feeling for them...

The guy was being kind !

Fairly ironic....
 
skippy said:
Agree with Particknd’s , comment#404 , this thread is “ full of blather ” , when it is not attacking the children of the man you choose to hate !

Jealousy on this thread has reached new depths of depravity and it is UNBELIEVABLE that the “ Moderators ” choose to continue to allow these people free rein to vent their sculirious , depraved and fictionist imaginings on the rest of us readers !

Time Moderators took note of the IP addresses of these miserable excuses for humanity and barred them from inflicting their worthless imaginings on the rest of humanity !

Copy of a Bruyneel tweet about 12hrs ago :

JohanBruyneel‏@JohanBruyneel
Discovered there's the massive amount of about 200 twitter cycling trolls, and they're all connected to each other. I'm feeling for them...

The guy was being kind !

Now everyone's allowed to speak from whichever orifice they chose, for heaven's sake; just please warn us when we are about to be splattered with mental excrement. So we can seek cover. :D
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
2
0
skippy said:

Johan? The guy who perpetuated a decade long fraud on the sport? harassed anyone who told the truth? We are supposed to feel sorry for him? Really?

In Johan's twisted world anyone who wants doping, corruption, and toxic bullies out of the sport is a troll
 
Oct 25, 2010
3,049
2
0
Race Radio said:
Johan? The guy who perpetuated a decade long fraud on the sport? harassed anyone who told the truth? We are supposed to feel sorry for him? Really?

In Johan's twisted world anyone who wants doping, corruption, and toxic bullies out of the sport is a troll

Johan is Lance's "Steve & Eydie"

1991-01-19-6.jpg


frank-sinatra-diamond-jubilee-tour-frankfurt-1991-tv-71958.jpg
 
Feb 4, 2010
547
0
0
It's about time you guys stopped even mentioning Floyd in the Floyd thread and focused on the only thing worth focusing on... :D
 
Jun 17, 2009
545
0
9,580
thehog said:
I guess what I meant was regardless of the Federal investigation being dropped a lot of information came to light. The normally impenetrable Armstrong was penetrated! What I still find odd is why the likes of Walsh/Sunday Times and the SCA have remained tight lipped since the end of the investigation. Surely they would want to begin proceeding to reclaim some of their losses? Or did they write it all off long ago? Not even a comment?

Maybe Nov’ wants to blow the back doors off? Do it the old fashion way?

For those of us that are ignorant and only look at these threads for a laugh at the haters, what does SCA stand for, can we have a quick summary of what that was about given its no doubt few years old.


Hugh
 
Jul 9, 2009
7,862
1,274
20,680
hughmoore said:
For those of us that are ignorant and only look at these threads for a laugh at the haters, what does SCA stand for, can we have a quick summary of what that was about given its no doubt few years old.


Hugh

Translation: "I really have my head just way, way far up my own a@@ and have no idea wtf I am talking about (because I don't really know), but you guys are all just stupid 'haterz' because you keep picking on Lance" :rolleyes: