Frank schleck

Page 22 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jun 13, 2012
35
0
0
It's like Garzelli all over again. Except we didn't get to see the non stop comfort breaks at the side of the road.
 
Cavalier said:
Pretty sure the last thing anyone can accuse me of is being naive about doping.

My point was simply that the timing - and product - is exceptionally odd considering everything else that's happening around that team at the moment.

Various folks thought CERA was a strange choice for similar reasons. Yet, that didn't stop use in the peloton.

You can be stupid and a doper, too.

Dave.
 
May 25, 2010
149
0
0
First bottle in the cages

I'd be wondering who put the water bottles on Frank's bike the morning on the 14th stage.
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
LaFlorecita said:
It's even better, Pellizotti is already back and Alberto will come back in just 18 days ;)
reiterating your anti-doping stance? ;)

There is a serenity in his eyes, but you also have the unmistakable impression that something is raging behind those walls of nondescript brown.
spot on description of a reckless liar and a doper right here.
except for the eye-color, this could apply to any given athlete claiming he's innocent at a press conference after having been caught red handed.

"rage", by the way, is a known side effect of steroids and steroid replacers such as clenbuterol. Lance knows all about it:
http://www.livestrong.com/article/154849-clenbuterol-side-effects/

back to FS. Some interesting parallels with AC
>> both FS and AC get caught (a) when not at their best, and (b) after already having decided to leave bruyneel.
>> both have been related to fuentes.
Is there some invisible hand at work here?
The movie Destination Zero comes to mind. first, you miraculously escape destiny, then destiny catches up with you.
 
Jul 19, 2010
347
0
0
I am impressed by how many are willing to accept, without a shred of evidence, outlandish conspiracy theories of the "I was poisoned" sort in order to reject what a mountain of circumstantial and more direct evidence suggests to be obvious.
 
Sep 23, 2009
409
0
0
Harmon on Eurosport has just mentioned Frank and what I think he called Zipimide as being the positive substance and although it is not banned it is used to mask other banned substances. This is odd, not banned but he is booted, now I realise Harmaon's factomoter may be broken but?
 
Mar 22, 2010
908
0
0
1st the team can't pay the riders and now they can't even pay the UCI ? Things really are getting dire for whoever writes the checks over at rsnt.
 
hrotha said:
The reports I've read use such awkward English I assume they aren't translations, but actual quotes. In that context, it's hard to determine what he meant. That unspecified person might be the manufacturer of whatever supplement or drink he suspects may have been tainted.

The unspecified person is Becca. Soon the truth will come out! :p

But seriously, this is really getting weird now. It was odd enough that he'd take a big risk of testing positive to cover up doping in what it obviously a sub par Tour for him anyway. There wasn't much up side to taking the risk.
 
Dec 11, 2009
161
0
0
To the people who wonder why he would dope because he's riding so badly: that's the whole point in taking dope, to get better :p
 
Aug 18, 2009
4,993
1
0
alberto.legstrong said:
1st the team can't pay the riders and now they can't even pay the UCI ? Things really are getting dire for whoever writes the checks over at rsnt.

Post of the day.
 
Jul 12, 2012
649
0
0
D Avoid said:
Harmon on Eurosport has just mentioned Frank and what I think he called Zipimide as being the positive substance and although it is not banned it is used to mask other banned substances. This is odd, not banned but he is booted, now I realise Harmaon's factomoter may be broken but?

Xipamide, being a thiazide analog is banned. Schleck knew what he was doing and by using an "ambiguous" substance, a possible out was provided should he be caught.

"S5. DIURETICS AND OTHER MASKING AGENTS
Masking agents are prohibited. They include:
Diuretics, desmopressin, plasma expanders (e.g. glycerol; intravenous administration of albumin, dextran, hydroxyethyl starch and mannitol), probenecid; and other substances with similar biological effect(s). Local application of felypressin in dental anaesthesia is not prohibited.

Diuretics include:
Acetazolamide, amiloride, bumetanide, canrenone, chlorthalidone, etacrynic acid, furosemide, indapamide, metolazone, spironolactone, thiazides (e.g. bendroflumethiazide, chlorothiazide, hydrochlorothiazide), triamterene; and other substances with a similar chemical structure or similar biological effect(s) (except drospirenone, pamabrom and topical dorzolamide and brinzolamide, which are not prohibited).

The use In- and Out-of-Competition, as applicable, of any quantity of a substance subject to threshold limits (i.e. formoterol, salbutamol, morphine, cathine, ephedrine, methylephedrine and pseudoephedrine) in conjunction with a diuretic or other masking agent requires the deliverance of a specific Therapeutic Use Exemption for that substance in addition to the one granted for the diuretic or other masking agent."
 
Sep 23, 2009
409
0
0
Turner29 said:
Xipamide, being a thiazide analog is banned. Schleck knew what he was doing and by using an "ambiguous" substance, a possible out was provided should he be caught.

"S5. DIURETICS AND OTHER MASKING AGENTS
Masking agents are prohibited. They include:
Diuretics, desmopressin, plasma expanders (e.g. glycerol; intravenous administration of albumin, dextran, hydroxyethyl starch and mannitol), probenecid; and other substances with similar biological effect(s). Local application of felypressin in dental anaesthesia is not prohibited.

Diuretics include:
Acetazolamide, amiloride, bumetanide, canrenone, chlorthalidone, etacrynic acid, furosemide, indapamide, metolazone, spironolactone, thiazides (e.g. bendroflumethiazide, chlorothiazide, hydrochlorothiazide), triamterene; and other substances with a similar chemical structure or similar biological effect(s) (except drospirenone, pamabrom and topical dorzolamide and brinzolamide, which are not prohibited).

The use In- and Out-of-Competition, as applicable, of any quantity of a substance subject to threshold limits (i.e. formoterol, salbutamol, morphine, cathine, ephedrine, methylephedrine and pseudoephedrine) in conjunction with a diuretic or other masking agent requires the deliverance of a specific Therapeutic Use Exemption for that substance in addition to the one granted for the diuretic or other masking agent."


My only point is that Harmon, a respected cycling Commentator/journalist is for some reason incompatible with the truth of the matter, is he by any chance a fan of Schrank Feck!!
 
D Avoid said:
My only point is that Harmon, a respected cycling Commentator/journalist is for some reason incompatible with the truth of the matter, is he by any chance a fan of Schrank Feck!!

Both him and Kirby were waffling on this morning from race start through to start of the first HC climb about it not being a banned substance. I twittered 'WADA S5' and some of the above to both of them but the misinformation was not corrected. Harmon might have had internet access problems (hence his O2 rant this afternoon on twitter) but Kirby was getting the tweets in Paris.

They took literally the fact that xipamide is not *named* on the WADA list, without actually reading the list itself to see that the list is not exhaustive and all diuretics bar a named quartet are illegal therefore banned. Absolutely shoddy and now many are ill-informed because they didn't do their homework.

Harmon also avoided defining what a diuretic is, stating that it helps weight loss ("why would Frank want to do that?") or can cover doping, but not saying it's main function is to increase urination. Sweep sweep.
 
Sep 23, 2009
409
0
0
argyllflyer said:
Both him and Kirby were waffling on this morning from race start through to start of the first HC climb about it not being a banned substance. I twittered 'WADA S5' and some of the above to both of them but the misinformation was not corrected. Harmon might have had internet access problems (hence his O2 rant this afternoon on twitter) but Kirby was getting the tweets in Paris.


Thanks for that, sometimes when you hear this kind of discussion on the box you are left thinking you imagined what has taken place!! Well see what Phill & Empty have to say tITtV 4 later!!
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
argyllflyer said:
Both him and Kirby were waffling on this morning from race start through to start of the first HC climb about it not being a banned substance. I twittered 'WADA S5' and some of the above to both of them but the misinformation was not corrected. Harmon might have had internet access problems (hence his O2 rant this afternoon on twitter) but Kirby was getting the tweets in Paris.

Dont expect Harmon and Kirby to provide accuracy when it coms to doping in cycling. Although they have managed to remember why Vino was banned.

They thought Rasmussen was thrown of the 2007 tour for telling the authorites that he was training In Italy when he was in Mexico.
 
Turner29 said:
Xipamide, being a thiazide analog is banned. Schleck knew what he was doing and by using an "ambiguous" substance, a possible out was provided should he be caught.

"S5. DIURETICS AND OTHER MASKING AGENTS
Masking agents are prohibited. They include:
Diuretics, desmopressin, plasma expanders (e.g. glycerol; intravenous administration of albumin, dextran, hydroxyethyl starch and mannitol), probenecid; and other substances with similar biological effect(s). Local application of felypressin in dental anaesthesia is not prohibited.

Diuretics include:
Acetazolamide, amiloride, bumetanide, canrenone, chlorthalidone, etacrynic acid, furosemide, indapamide, metolazone, spironolactone, thiazides (e.g. bendroflumethiazide, chlorothiazide, hydrochlorothiazide), triamterene; and other substances with a similar chemical structure or similar biological effect(s) (except drospirenone, pamabrom and topical dorzolamide and brinzolamide, which are not prohibited).

The use In- and Out-of-Competition, as applicable, of any quantity of a substance subject to threshold limits (i.e. formoterol, salbutamol, morphine, cathine, ephedrine, methylephedrine and pseudoephedrine) in conjunction with a diuretic or other masking agent requires the deliverance of a specific Therapeutic Use Exemption for that substance in addition to the one granted for the diuretic or other masking agent."

Is Schleck a chemist? Did he get a degree in his spare time so he could tell which substances have similar chemical structures?