Zinoviev Letter said:Interesting that the reaction from sections of the peloton seems to be unusually blunt. The first two tweets in my timeline were Matt Brammeier telling Frank to go home and calling him a tosser, and another pro calling him a ***.
Catwhoorg said:Nope to the bolded.
Most drugs of any sort have 3 ways out of the body.
1) converted (usually by the liver) to something else.
2) urine
3) faces
This particular drug is about:
1/3 converted
~1/5 in the urine in its unaltered form
rest in the feces
(all those years of boring pharmacokinetics finally have a use on the internet.)
Arnout said:Which I think is incredibly stupid and more a look at me reaction than being sincere. If it was EPO yes, but this is a substance I bet those guys never even heard of.
Arnout said:Which I think is incredibly stupid and more a look at me reaction than being sincere. If it was EPO yes, but this is a substance I bet those guys never even heard of.
Froome19 said:UCI stock quote
webvan said:What's this "specified substance" business that means he dosnt get automatically suspended ? Is it just a way of saying they have to wait for the B sample ? Confused...
argyllflyer said:
webvan said:What's this "specified substance" business that means he doesn't get automatically suspended ? Is it just a way of saying they have to wait for the B sample ? Confused...
Epicycle said:Yeah I can't find any other athlete whose ever tested positive for this particular diuretic. I wonder what he was trying to mask. Is it possible he was doing something to lower his blood values, went to far and had to use a diuretic to get rid of excess fluid in his system?
Froome19 said:Only a masking agent
Zinoviev Letter said:Whether it's wise to comment on an "adverse analytical finding" on the part of another rider before everything is shaken out is one issue. What riders speaking out immediately and bluntly represents in terms of the culture of the peloton is another.