Froomey keeps crashing the forum. At least he looked tired today, and even faded a bit in the last few km. When he had 1'40" the Purito group at 3 km to go I thought he'd put 3 minutes into them.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
The Hitch said:Back on. For how long.
So what were the times.
I saw Race Radio said it was a lot slower than the record, neglecting to mention the record was a itt in Dauphine, but anyway.
There was tailwind today yes, but there was also Froome on his own for a long time and an extremely fast stage before it.
zalacain said:According to RAI 48'33" the fastest time since Pantani (and after 200km +)
Parrulo said:I wonder what the sky defenders have to say about this. . . i don't know if it was just me not paying enough attention, but it felt like they sort of went quiet after Ax-3-D.
I am not talking about the skybots that showed up recently, i am talking about guys like Jimmy and Martin.
Also ascent times and power estimations anyone?
No, according to Rai it was 47'40'' (last 15 kms), almost a minute better than Armstrong's 48'33'' which was the fastest ever on a MTFzalacain said:According to RAI 48'33" the fastest time since Pantani (and after 200km +)
Eshnar said:No, according to Rai it was 47'40'' (last 15 kms), almost a minute better than Armstrong's 48'33'' which was the fastest ever on a MTF
The fastest ever in a road race should be Pantani '94 around 46 minutes, the finish that time was in Carpentras.
Still, "not normal" is an understatement.
I'm reporting what RAI actually said. I didn't clock it myself.Walkman said:I clocked him at 47:12 from 15 km.
Moose McKnuckles said:If Froome was 1:40 ahead of a juiced to the gills Armstrong, what about the whole bunch of dudes who finished about the same time as Armstrong (1:40 back). What about Quintana too?
Is this what the new cycling era looks like? Because it's even more ridiculous than the old era.
Moose McKnuckles said:People he put in a buck forty into the likes of Contador and Purito, not guys like Talansky or Dan Martin. Those guys were way the f*ck back there. Evans was done way before this and he's a former winner. The only guy who could stay with Froome for a little while was Quintana who is 100% built for this terrain, and even he was handed 30 seconds in a couple Ks or so.
Eshnar said:No, according to Rai it was 47'40'' .
Carlo Algatrensig said:As someone has already said I've also never seen someone accelerate like that on a climb while staying in the saddle. If I can be bothered later on I might try to see if I can figure out what rpm Froome was doing when he dropped Contador. My guess is possibly 120+
hrotha said:I'd be careful with the time this once. Mont Ventoux almost always has a headwind, so I imagine that right there was a crucial factor.
I'm afraid this time I can't rely on the numbers that much and I'll have to trust my gut, which was chuckling throughout the whole climb.
happytramp said:Quite an achievement for the UK.
Worlds greatest TT'er - Brad
Worlds greatest sprinter - Cav
Worlds greatest climber - Froome
Probably got the greatest track cyclist too, not sure. All hail your new cycling overlords.
mewmewmew13 said:Greg Henderson tweeted that there was a tailwind the whole way up
@Greghenderson1
"Tailwind up the whole climb helped my watts per kilo guys so don't go getting too impressed by my time up Ventoux."
roundabout said:I find it somewhat hard to believe that Henderson isn't exaggerating a little.
Exactly. Personally I think more should be made of the time Froome put on everybody else in a few km, with a tailwind, than of any climbing times, as those are going to be off for everyone. Doesn't make Froome (or Porte) any less ridiculous, mind.mewmewmew13 said:Greg Henderson tweeted that there was a tailwind the whole way up
@Greghenderson1
"Tailwind up the whole climb helped my watts per kilo guys so don't go getting too impressed by my time up Ventoux."
hrotha said:Exactly. Personally I think more should be made of the time Froome put on everybody else in a few km, with a tailwind, than of any climbing times, as those are going to be off for everyone. Doesn't make Froome (or Porte) any less ridiculous, mind.