BYOP88 said:Wouldn't he need 1 for his bilharzia drug?
I doubt it's on the banned list.
BYOP88 said:Wouldn't he need 1 for his bilharzia drug?
Red Lobster said:Either I suddenly can't read English or there is something seriously wrong with this sentence.
ChewbaccaD said:I think it makes as much sense as the sentence to which I responded...
ChewbaccaD said:I think it makes as much sense as the sentence to which I responded...
However, it does come with some nasty side effects, for which corticosteroids are apparently one of the most effective preventors, which is why it's surprising if he doesn't claim one for those, since they commonly crop up in doping discussions and Froome would actually have a legit reason to use them.King Boonen said:I doubt it's on the banned list.
the sceptic said:i dont really care either way
if they release them that means Brailsford thinks its good for buisness to do so
martinvickers said:No, it doesn't. It does nothing of the sort.
Attack the points on the merits. The reason why the points were made is irrelevant - bollxology of the first water, and a form of ad hominem.
As i said, address the points. the rest id bullsh!t.
Catwhoorg said:A little dated (its for the 2008 Olympics)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/olympics/cycling/7533548.stm
'Sports Science academic' (B.Sc IIRC) and an MBA.
ChewbaccaD said:If for to you see the damage it's a seemingly few taking lots of salad she wasn't to for too smell tossed boats of arrest.
Benotti69 said:Serious amount of people there from Wales!
No_Balls said:Before Froomes patriotic speech on how proud british he was during the press conference yesterday, he also thanked for all the support he has from Britain. The only reason for that is because he doesnt feel any support elsewhere.
This you can see anywhere during the discussions in regard of this debate.
BroDeal said:I missed it but I can imagine it.
"Even though I was born in Kenya, grew up in South Africa, and live in Monaco, I am proud to enrich myself by claiming to be a member of the gullible British public. God save the Queen."
Funny how even Armstrong had plenty of suckers from around the world, or at least from English speaking countries. Froome's fanbase is pretty much denizens of a failed empire who appear to have self-esteem issues.
BroDeal said:I missed it but I can imagine it.
"Even though I was born in Kenya, grew up in South Africa, and live in Monaco, I am proud to enrich myself by claiming to be a member of the gullible British public. God save the Queen."
The Hitch said:Read on twitter that Bailsford told French tv that Froome could have gone faster on Ventoux.
Dont know if its a wind up.
BroDeal said:"Even though I was born in Kenya, grew up in South Africa, and live in Monaco, I am proud to enrich myself by claiming to be a member of the gullible British public. God save the Queen."
Factors affecting VO2 maxCerberus said:Can I ask about the VOmax thing discussed a few pages back? Why would Froome having a VOmax of 94 explain anything? Doesn't EPO improve performance exactly because it improves VOmax?
Cerberus said:Can I ask about the VOmax thing discussed a few pages back? Why would Froome having a VOmax of 94 explain anything? Doesn't EPO improve performance exactly because it improves VOmax?
orbeas said:Seems Mr Froome has a new set of rules for racing
"It was too dangerous for Contador do it like that." said Froome. "He attacked on the climb, attacked on the descent. It's too much,"
But this is basically the argument about an implausible performance jump that many including myself have been making. If Froome was shown to have a very high VOmax it wouldn't and shouldn't convince anybody he was clean because that high VOmax could be the result of doping, right?BroDeal said:Because VO2Max only increases by so much due to training. Figures of 25-30% are often given. Froome with minimal training would still have a formidable VO2Max for an amateur or a young pro. He would have dominated amateur racing at a young age right from the beginning.
This is why a rider like LeMond was able to beat full grown U.S. pros when he was a junior, and that was being handicapped with the requirement to use junior gearing. As another example, Lemond rode l'Etape due Tour a few years ago because his son was riding it. He was fat and old. He obviously was not doing much training. He still finished in the top 10%. That is against amateurs who train hard for what is a long, difficult event. LeMond's results in those examples did not come from super secret training methods. It came from being vastly physiologically superior to the average amateur.
Anyone who has done much racing, bike, running, whatever, has encountered people who are--depressingly--superior to everyone else. It does not matter what type of training you do and how hard you do it. The talent difference is so large they beat people while barely trying.
There is no possible way that Froome spent his early years as an unremarkable amateur and early pro then suddenly discovered he had the potential to peak at a VO2Max of 90+. Impossible. He is doping.
BroDeal said:There is no possible way that Froome spent his early years as an unremarkable amateur and early pro then suddenly discovered he had the potential to peak at a VO2Max of 90+. Impossible. He is doping.
Climbing out of the saddle DOES create more drag than climbing seated. That should be intuitively obvious to you. And the pedaling stroke is more efficient when seated. But both those factors are overwhelmed by the additional raw power that is available from the system as a whole (quads, glutes, lats and the rest) when out of the saddle.Deagol said:LOL, attacking out of the saddle creates too much drag on a climb? someone should have told that to Contador..