TheEnoculator said:Remember that unlike Armstrong, Froome never failed a drug test, not even a remotely suspicious sample. So there'll be a lot more Froome supporters than Armstrong had back in the days.
We can only look at what's conceived as ridiculous performance and deduce that Froome is most likely on dope. But Sky would be way above USPS in technologies and a lot more lessons learned. So it's much harder to get concrete dirt on Sky.
Brailsford wasn't so confident in turning over the data for no reason.
What is troubling about the first part of this comparrison is how many drug tests Lance actually passed. And the other stuff- spot on.