- May 19, 2015
- 229
- 0
- 0
I actually don't think Froome is using regular dope, it was a motor all along. That's why he see himself as clean.
popular jams said:After a rest day, no less.
Quite the opposite it seems to me. He is earning kudos with his "panache", courtesy of having extra watts ready at hand, as we speak.MartinGT said:If the stage is cut tomorrow it may stop him going full *** and it will keep the masses down.
ontheroad said:The cadence and power that Froome is able to transmit is insanity and even more so for a climber (well since 2011).
this, i'm afraid.SeriousSam said:If I had to guess what's going to transpire for the rest of the tour, it would be the following:
Dawg undropable in the mountains without any silly attacks. Significant gains in the time trials seal it. Easy 'hard fought' victory that isn't even suspicious because doped up ITTs are overlooked by the public as such and well, Froome has always been a great time trialler hasn't he, second only to sir Bradley.
SeriousSam said:If I had to guess what's going to transpire for the rest of the tour, it would be the following:
Dawg undropable in the mountains without any silly attacks. Significant gains in the time trials seal it. Easy 'hard fought' victory that isn't even suspicious because doped up ITTs are overlooked by the public as such and well, Froome has always been a great time trialler hasn't he, second only to sir Bradley.
PremierAndrew said:And why are ASO so keen to protect a non-French guy, who two weeks ago was by far one of the most disliked cyclists in the peloton, riding on a motorbike? I'd be surprised if he's not doping, but the conspiracy theories for Froome using a motor are ridiculous.
Electro-magnetic wheels come close to being undetectable, but even the electric currents needed for those generate heat, so ASO would know about it. Maybe Sky do have some undetectable ****, but no way ASO would
protect Sky/Froome if they did find something like that
Agreed, I don't buy the motor theory. It makes absolutely no sense for his win on Peyresourde in particular - when he could have just used the motor on the climb to open up a gap instead of doing a crazy, slightly risky descent.PremierAndrew said:And why are ASO so keen to protect a non-French guy, who two weeks ago was by far one of the most disliked cyclists in the peloton, riding on a motorbike? I'd be surprised if he's not doping, but the conspiracy theories for Froome using a motor are ridiculous.
Electro-magnetic wheels come close to being undetectable, but even the electric currents needed for those generate heat, so ASO would know about it. Maybe Sky do have some undetectable ****, but no way ASO would
protect Sky/Froome if they did find something like that
PremierAndrew said:And why are ASO so keen to protect a non-French guy, who two weeks ago was by far one of the most disliked cyclists in the peloton, riding on a motorbike? I'd be surprised if he's not doping, but the conspiracy theories for Froome using a motor are ridiculous.
Electro-magnetic wheels come close to being undetectable, but even the electric currents needed for those generate heat, so ASO would know about it. Maybe Sky do have some undetectable ****, but no way ASO would
protect Sky/Froome if they did find something like that
ontheroad said:http://forum.cyclingnews.com/viewtopic.php?p=1968841#p1968841 said:I really hoped that Froome would be forced into going full gas in the mountains but it looks like he might have avoided the need to do so.
SeriousSam said:ontheroad said:http://forum.cyclingnews.com/viewtopic.php?p=1968841#p1968841 said:I really hoped that Froome would be forced into going full gas in the mountains but it looks like he might have avoided the need to do so.
This is exactly why I said I hope that he loses a few minutes with a mechanical in the RR forum.
Froome's first shot at the Tour de France saw him obliterate the peloton at Ax3, obliterate the peloton in a pancake flat time trial, and obliterate the peloton at Mont Ventoux. He won another time trial for good measure and controlled the rest of the mountains. It was an absurd power advantage over the nearest competitor throughout the Tour, incredibly dominant.
In 2015, he obliterated the peloton at PSM and was then so far ahead of Quintana thanks to the stage 2 loss than the entire rest of the Tour was just pure control.
Yet his PSM performance led to a lot of doubts and negative PR that spilled over into mainstream media, and Sky were had to work hard to repair the damage, culminating with a brilliant coup when they got a scientist on record effectively absolving Froome without that being backed up by the analysis that scientist did.
If Froome and Sky had the means to win the Tour without a full *** MTF performance because time trialling isn't deemed suspicious, would they take it? I think they would.