Teams & Riders Froome Talk Only

Page 211 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Apr 19, 2010
1,112
0
0
happytramp said:
Quite an achievement for the UK.

Worlds greatest TT'er - Brad
Worlds greatest sprinter - Cav
Worlds greatest climber - Froome

Probably got the greatest track cyclist too, not sure. All hail your new cycling overlords.

We always kick everyone's *** in downhill mountain biking :D
 
Jan 3, 2013
84
0
0
happytramp said:
Quite an achievement for the UK.

Worlds greatest TT'er - Brad
Worlds greatest sprinter - Cav
Worlds greatest climber - Froome

Probably got the greatest track cyclist too, not sure. All hail your new cycling overlords.

I think Marcel Kittel and Tony Martin might disagree with that list.
 
Jun 7, 2011
4,281
2,840
21,180
FoxxyBrown1111 said:
I am sorry some of you guys can´t believe in miracles... :p

I think Froome just wanna show everybody (Brailsford inclusive) that he was truly p.i$$ed for two years to have to sit behind boring and weaker than him Wiggins. He is on a mission. No holds barred.

He might dope, he may not.

But i don´t understand the hate towards him. He is like Ullrich: Humble in interviews. You never hear a bad word from him. No personal attacks like Armstrong. He just "diesel it up" (ok, Ullrich never accelareted like him today, but otherwise Froome reminds me of his beautiful style).
No-nonsense in the saddle like the Schlecks and AC used to bore us with, less than two years ago.
No pointless gifts like Armstrong, that just lead to more sore apples.
And most importantly: no arrogant behavior like Armstrong. So after all i like this guy until (if he ever) gets caught.
I truly enjoy the ride. Who knows when will ever see such ecxiting (& most importantly fruitful) attacks again.

It's because they are all in love with Contador.

Is it true that Froome climbed Ventoux slower than Wiggins and co. in 2009?
 
FoxxyBrown1111 said:
I am sorry some of you guys can´t believe in miracles... :p

I think Froome just wanna show everybody (Brailsford inclusive) that he was truly p.i$$ed for two years to have to sit behind boring and weaker than him Wiggins. He is on a mission. No holds barred.

He might dope, he may not.

But i don´t understand the hate towards him. He is like Ullrich: Humble in interviews. You never hear a bad word from him. No personal attacks like Armstrong. He just "diesel it up" (ok, Ullrich never accelareted like him today, but otherwise Froome reminds me of his beautiful style).
No-nonsense in the saddle like the Schlecks and AC used to bore us with, less than two years ago.
No pointless gifts like Armstrong, that just lead to more sore apples.
And most importantly: no arrogant behavior like Armstrong. So after all i like this guy until (if he ever) gets caught.
I truly enjoy the ride. Who knows when will ever see such ecxiting (& most importantly fruitful) attacks again.

We dislike doping Mengele. Unlike you.
 

zlev11

BANNED
Jan 23, 2011
2,734
3,146
17,180
that stage made me remember when Tyler described, in his book, one of Armstrong's attacks/counter attacks as "a motorcycle cop speeding up to pull someone over and give them a ticket".

not normal.
 
Aug 5, 2010
11,027
89
22,580
Poursuivant said:
It's because they are all in love with Contador.

Is it true that Froome climbed Ventoux slower than Wiggins and co. in 2009?

Don't know where you heard that and i am sorry to be the one to break the news to you, but he did it faster then Armstrong in his peak years.
 
Nov 29, 2010
2,326
0
0
MrRoboto said:
Froome did it quite a lot faster than anyone in 2009 as far as the times I have seen.

Froome was over 3 minutes behind the record and slower than Contador/Schleck in 2009. You wouldn't have guessed reading this thread though ;)
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
Poursuivant said:
It's because they are all in love with Contador.

Is it true that Froome climbed Ventoux slower than Wiggins and co. in 2009?
1. Lance Armstrong _____ USA | 48:33 | 2002
-2. Andy Schleck ________ LUX | 48.57 | 2009
-3. Alberto Contador ____ ESP | 48:57 | 2009
-4. Lance Armstrong _____ USA | 49:00 | 2009
-5. Marco Pantani _______ ITA | 49:01 | 2000
-6. Lance Armstrong _____ USA | 49:01 | 2000
-7. Frank Schleck _______ LUX | 49:02 | 2009
-8. Roman Kreuziger _____ CZE | 49:05 | 2009
-9. Franco Pellizotti ___ ITA | 49:15 | 2009
10. Vincenzo Nibali _____ ITA | 49:17 | 2009

vetooo ‏@ammattipyoraily

#TDF, Mont Ventoux. From 15 km banner. Chirs Froome: 47 min 11 sec. I think 48 min 35 sec (last 15.65 km) is quite accurate estimation.
 
Oct 21, 2012
1,106
0
0
zlev11 said:
that stage made me remember when Tyler described, in his book, one of Armstrong's attacks/counter attacks as "a motorcycle cop speeding up to pull someone over and give them a ticket".

not normal.

Just remembered that :D. It's really a perfect summary of what we saw today.

UlisesLima said:
Are you asking us about his bike or his products?

The bike, of course :D. He probably had some monster 130 tooth chainring. And still managed to get his cadence to what looked like 150+.

tumblr_la46t8Fmti1qbxnpgo1_500.jpg


Marginal gains.
 
Aug 5, 2010
11,027
89
22,580
deValtos said:
Froome was over 3 minutes behind the record and slower than Contador/Schleck in 2009. You wouldn't have guessed reading this thread though ;)

Oh please do show us your time measures

the sceptic said:
vetooo ‏@ammattipyoraily

#TDF, Mont Ventoux. From 15 km banner. Chirs Froome: 47 min 11 sec. I think 48 min 35 sec (last 15.65 km) is quite accurate estimation.

They are clearly wrong, deValtos says the were slower!!!!
 
May 29, 2011
3,549
1,651
16,680
vetooo is the reference when it comes to calculating the times so probably not. perhaps you were sarcastic.

if they dont *** sky soon, it will be postal all over again.
 
Jul 7, 2013
368
0
0
The youngster Quintana attacked from far out and was "just" 29s behind Froome. If Froome is such an obvious doper Quintana must at least be in the suspicion area. Or is Quitana's performance credible because he has always been a huge talent who is now coming into his own? If so, then you agree that a clean talented climber can go almost as fast a fulldoped rider equal to Armstrong. And many seems to believe that Quintana will just get better, if so he will reach Froome level considering how close he is now. Seems to be some inconsistency here.
 
May 19, 2011
520
2
9,585
deValtos said:
Froome was over 3 minutes behind the record and slower than Contador/Schleck in 2009. You wouldn't have guessed reading this thread though ;)
No I wouldn't, because others here are actually posting times (which are faster). So what is is your time?
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
Bakhjulet said:
The youngster Quintana attacked from far out and was "just" 29s behind Froome. If Froome is such an obvious doper Quintana must at least be in the suspicion area. Or is Quitana's performance credible because he has always been a huge talent who is now coming into his own? If so, then you agree that a clean talented climber can go almost as fast a fulldoped rider equal to Armstrong. Seems to be some inconsistency here.

take it to the movistar/quintana thread
 

zlev11

BANNED
Jan 23, 2011
2,734
3,146
17,180
frenchfry said:
How are we expected to want to watch the rest of this TDF after that?


who knows, maybe Froome will breakaway on the Alpe and pull his jersey over his head and start yelling "i am the great cornholio!"

200px-Cornholio.jpg
 
Oct 21, 2012
1,106
0
0
Bakhjulet said:
The youngster Quintana attacked from far out and was "just" 29s behind Froome. If Froome is such an obvious doper Quintana must at least be in the suspicion area. Or is Quitana's performance credible because he has always been a huge talent who is now coming into his own? If so, then you agree that a clean talented climber can go almost as fast a fulldoped rider equal to Armstrong. And many seem to believe that Quintana will just get better, if so he will reach Froome level considering how close he is now. Seems to be some inconsistency here.

Calm down. Nobody believes for a second that Nairo is clean.