Lappartient is all over the map. In the beginning of this month, he said Froome's case needed to be resolved as soon as possible. Then in Italy over the past weekend, he acknowledged that the case probably wouldn't be resolved before the Giro, and counseled patience. Now he's saying the decision better occur before the Tour, or it would be a "disaster". Why not a disaster if Froome rides the Giro?
But here's where it gets really strange:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/lappartient-it-would-be-difficult-for-froome-to-ride-the-tour-de-france-without-a-verdict/
He's assuming that it won't be a back-dated suspension, or if it is, it will be longer than nine months (because if it weren't, it would end before the Tour). So he's implying he has some information on what the decision will or will not be. I don't see how he could know this for certain, and even if he did, he certainly shouldn't make his information public.
But if that is the case, if any suspension is proactive, then there's no (official) problem with Froome's riding the Giro or the Tour, because his results will count, unless the decision comes down during the race.
But as I've said before, it seems unlikely the decision will be announced during either GT. If the judge came to a decision during the GT, that would mean the hearing had been held prior to the GT. If the judge knew by the time the GT started that the decision would be a suspension--it was just a matter of preparing the report--s/he could surely instruct the UCI to hold Froome out of the race, with the period prior to the official announcement credited to time served. If the judge did not know what the decision would be when the GT started, s/he would most likely postpone the announcement till after the race was over.
But here's where it gets really strange:
Lappartient confirmed that if the Froome case was sent to the UCI Anti-doping Tribunal and he was found guilty of an alleged anti-doping violation, he would be immediately suspended. Froome could only appeal to the CAS to overturn the UCI Anti-doping Tribunal verdict.
"If this goes to the Tribunal it will be up to the Tribunal to decide. If they decide to give a penalty a one-year suspension or whatever, then this will apply immediately," Lappartient said.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/lappartient-it-would-be-difficult-for-froome-to-ride-the-tour-de-france-without-a-verdict/
He's assuming that it won't be a back-dated suspension, or if it is, it will be longer than nine months (because if it weren't, it would end before the Tour). So he's implying he has some information on what the decision will or will not be. I don't see how he could know this for certain, and even if he did, he certainly shouldn't make his information public.
But if that is the case, if any suspension is proactive, then there's no (official) problem with Froome's riding the Giro or the Tour, because his results will count, unless the decision comes down during the race.
But as I've said before, it seems unlikely the decision will be announced during either GT. If the judge came to a decision during the GT, that would mean the hearing had been held prior to the GT. If the judge knew by the time the GT started that the decision would be a suspension--it was just a matter of preparing the report--s/he could surely instruct the UCI to hold Froome out of the race, with the period prior to the official announcement credited to time served. If the judge did not know what the decision would be when the GT started, s/he would most likely postpone the announcement till after the race was over.