Teams & Riders Froome Talk Only

Page 1277 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
May 11, 2013
13,995
5,289
28,180
Basically WADA said it's perfectly fine to be found with double the amount of salbutamol, a good pal Craig Reedie.
 
May 15, 2011
45,171
617
24,680
I wonder which explanation they accepted, the dehydration theory, the kidney malfunction theory, the test inaccuracy explanation, the aliens did it theory ?
 
Jul 4, 2010
5,669
1,349
20,680
Re:

LaFlorecita said:
I wonder which explanation they accepted, the dehydration theory, the kidney malfunction theory, the test inaccuracy explanation, the aliens did it theory ?

The dog with a cough theory :lol:
 
Apr 14, 2014
1,069
705
12,680
This is it. They can now do just about everything they want it seems. Sky got caught and nothing happened. Expect them to break all the records in the following month, laughing at the public while finishing 1-2-3 on a couple of stages. What a shame for cycling... when you have proof of cheating and you still not do anything...
 
Feb 1, 2011
9,403
2,275
20,680
Re:

LaFlorecita said:
I wonder which explanation they accepted, the dehydration theory, the kidney malfunction theory, the test inaccuracy explanation, the aliens did it theory ?


Don't worry, everything's fine, UCI says so.

The UCI understands that there will be significant discussion of this decision, but wishes to reassure all those involved in or interested in cycling that its decision is based on expert opinions, WADA’s advice, and a full assessment of the facts of the case. The UCI hopes that the cycling world can now turn its focus to, and enjoy, the upcoming races on the cycling calendar.
 
Jul 4, 2010
5,669
1,349
20,680
They got out hopes up and I was hoping to watch the Tour after a charade of the Giro, but nah, I'll not bother thank you.
 
Sep 11, 2016
2,624
2,739
17,180
It wouldn't surprise me if something bad happens during the race next week. Hope not, but someone is not gonna like this result.
 
Jun 8, 2010
3,569
607
15,680
Not even the Vuelta stripped…
Well this easies my mind quite a bit, absolutely no reasons to keep following cycling at this point.
 
Mar 13, 2013
4,857
903
17,680
You guys put too much faith in anonymous social media too much. Step back to the beginning of this and it was always going to end this way. I'm not going to say obvious, but it seems a media storm like Wiggins Jiffy Bag more than actual anti-doping. As Armstrong said when the AAF got leaked: "Something is not right about this leak"
 
Feb 1, 2011
9,403
2,275
20,680
Re:

brownbobby said:
The only dignity can come from silence at times like this :D

Well, you and the other die-hards certainly earned your right to gloat a little bit here, I'll give you that. ;)
 
Jun 10, 2010
19,897
2,256
25,680
Re:

samhocking said:
You guys put too much faith in anonymous social media too much. Step back to the beginning of this and it was always going to end this way. I'm not going to say obvious, but it seems a media storm like Wiggins Jiffy Bag more than actual anti-doping. As Armstrong said when the AAF got leaked: "Something is not right about this leak"
This is BS. ALL precedents pointed towards a suspension and his losing the Vuelta.
 
May 15, 2011
45,171
617
24,680
Re: Re:

spalco said:
LaFlorecita said:
I wonder which explanation they accepted, the dehydration theory, the kidney malfunction theory, the test inaccuracy explanation, the aliens did it theory ?


Don't worry, everything's fine, UCI says so.

The UCI understands that there will be significant discussion of this decision, but wishes to reassure all those involved in or interested in cycling that its decision is based on expert opinions, WADA’s advice, and a full assessment of the facts of the case. The UCI hopes that the cycling world can now turn its focus to, and enjoy, the upcoming races on the cycling calendar.
Everybody move along :lol:

The smell of corruption is in the air.
 
Feb 1, 2011
9,403
2,275
20,680
Re:

yaco said:
So I assume the ASO decision to ban Froome from the case has now been withdrawn ?

Must be. It's impossible to justify now, borderline slanderous even without the doping case pending.
 
Jul 4, 2010
5,669
1,349
20,680
Re:

yaco said:
So I assume the ASO decision to ban Froome from the case has now been withdrawn ?

Of course.

I wonder if Prudhomme put pressure on the UCI to hurry up.