craig1985 said:If I were Trent Lowe, and I knew other guys on the team were doping, I would bring them all down.
hubbard said:yes, trent lowe appears to be setting himself up to be floyd landis the second
Sanitiser said:Where does it say Trent Lowe was sick? Speculating it seems Lowe would not be the only one being sent to Del Moral when Vaughters and Co. checked their .pdf attachments. Hence the scapegoating of White and not Lowe.
Barrus said:allright this is pure and complete speculation, but do all you guys remember what Landis said a few days ago about Garmin being US Postal 2.0? Perhaps he already knew about this Lowe business, or heard about it through the grapevine, and perhaps more rumours are circulating.
dbrower said:Hmm, the 500k claim was not in the timeline. Martin Hardie was the guy who put on the New Cylcing Pathways conference. Hard to picture him in a 500k shakedown of Garmin, but who knows.
auscyclefan94 said:Some interesting tweets by Neal Rogers editro of Velo News
@Ride_Argyle statement claims Trent Lowe sent PDF of UCI blood work, with del Moral's name on letterhead, to team doc and @Vaughters in 2009
@Ride_Argyle statement claims that in breach of contract negotiations, Lowe demanded €500,000 or he would go public with del Moral visit
Lowe threatened to release certain info on garmin unless they payed him 1/2 a million euros. Slipstream now have said that Lowe went to del Moral for health checks every quarter.
bobbins said:1 rider against a large organisation like slipstream doesn't stand a chance. They shaft him for his wages and he's left teamless (not their fault) so without any other options he plays the only card he has.
Slipstream aren't coming out of this very well are they? They are starting to look just as dodgy as the other teams.
Would be good to see JVs phone history and emails since this kicked off.
thehog said:Good to know the UCI is using trusted labs for their blood testing! Del Moral! Is a UCI testing agent?!!
They look negligent so far. Nothing more for now.bobbins said:1 rider against a large organisation like slipstream doesn't stand a chance. They shaft him for his wages and he's left teamless (not their fault) so without any other options he plays the only card he has.
Slipstream aren't coming out of this very well are they? They are starting to look just as dodgy as the other teams.
Would be good to see JVs phone history and emails since this kicked off.
ingsve said:As they stated in the press release- The visits by Lowe had nothing to do with the blood passport or any other anti-doping measures. It was simply the regular health check that all riders need to go through and which they are free to do with any doctor they choose without breaking any regulations.
Nearly said:So why focus on blood test as they have in this part of the Slipstream statement:-
"It is critical to note that this blood test was a third quarter UCI health check test, a procedure mandated by the UCI to ensure the health of the riders, and not an anti-doping measure. This health check has nothing to do with the biological passport or ASDI. UCI health check blood tests may be done at any laboratory of the rider's volition and do not have to follow any of the handling guidelines that anti-doping tests must.
The PDF was not discovered in our original investigation as that investigation was focused on the referral made by Matt White. It is also important to note that blood tests in Spain do not require an order or attendance from a physician and that there does not seem to be any violation of team policy by Trent Lowe in connection with the performance of the mandated UCI blood tests."
Fee fi fo fum I smell some dissembling here. Why bother to require notification of the blood tests let alone to the boss if they are so insignificant?
dbrower said:Hmm, the 500k claim was not in the timeline. Martin Hardie was the guy who put on the New Cylcing Pathways conference. Hard to picture him in a 500k shakedown of Garmin, but who knows.
-dB
craig1985 said:As for the team bike thing, I thought it was common practice when a guy switches team, at the end of October he hands his old bike back (or keeps it), and for the following season he rides his new bike, but has to wear the kit of his old team until December 31 (for example when Danny Pate switched to HTC, he would have to wear his Garmin kit until December 31 2010, but from November onwards he rides a Specialized bike, the one he would use in 2011).
" said:@leguape @euanlindsay ... No. I require riders to get written permission from past teams before attending our early camp.
ingsve said:As stated, they are mandated by the UCI to do these tests and the reason for the notification is so they it can be sent to the UCI in line with that mandate. Are you suggesting they should not notify the UCI of tests that they UCI requires notification of? I guess you could call that insignificant but I would call it routine.
Granville57 said:That's a very interesting and valid point.
What seems the most odd about all of this is that Lowe seems to have been willing to blackmail Slipstream based on the his own actions!
That just seems like a particularly twisted threat, as if to say, "Pay up, or I'm going to reveal what I myself did."
If we follow that logic further: Lowes is acknowledging something damaging, or at the very least scandalous in his own behavior. So how would he then be able to walk away without being tarnished?
Would he have gone on to claim something like, "Oh yeah, there was doping going on at Garmin...ME! See how bad those guys (me) are over there under JV's watch?"
Very strange indeed.
This story isn't over yet.
Maybe something along the lines of "A Garmin DS sent me to a doctor who offered to make me a doping plan. I didn't go through with it. Look at my horrible 2009 and 2010 results, not doped. Also when they found out I wasn't cool with it they stopped taking me to the important races. I rode the 2008 Tour de France and that was it."this_is_edie said:Exactly, this makes no sense to me at all. What is Lowe trying to blackmail them about?