King Boonen said:
Do we know that he isn't currently delivering value for money?
Some comparisons. (2011/2012 data from the UK sport annual report)
thousands of pounds
Cycling Athletes 869
Cycling federation 4096
Rowing Athletes 1432
Rowing federation 3373
Athletics Athletes 1501
Athletics federation 2226 (down heavily from 2010-11)
Boxing Athletes 513
Boxing Federation 1035
Swimming Athletes 1717
Swimming Federation 5341
Cycling currently has 8 medals (3 road 5 track) and should get another 3 or more
Rowing has 9 medals (done)
Athletics has 4 currently - should double that at least
Boxing has none (and I'm not sure of what prospects there are)
Swimming has 3 medals (done)
It may not be the absolute best for medals/investment (I think gymnastics will nab that) but certainly cycling is going to right up there.
That is if 'value for money' is taken as Olympic medals
(Cycling does a whole lot of development of talent, keeping the pipeline full for future medals as well. Arguably better than any other federation in the UK right now)