Bicicleta said:Sit down Armstrong - Vino is about to become the most tested cyclist out there.
luckyboy said:What I'm saying is that a clean rider, training specifically for this 3/4 week period, can finish high up in these one day races. Then go off to the Tour and finish 2/3 hours down like he always does.
la.margna said:But this doesn't change the fascination for this great sport!
ludwig said:Huh? Where do you get this stuff? Look at the results of these races for the past 15 years and explain to me how they are populated by "clean riders".
issoisso said:You mean dethroning Zabel and all the other bucketload of cyclists who were far, far more tested than Armstrong based on the list the UCI released around the time he retired?
Don't believe the myths the man loves to perpetuate![]()
trompe le monde said:Maybe one way to instil a sense of trust amongst peers, which would reduce the systematic nature of doping, is to reduce the gap between the highest paid and lowest paid cyclist, thereby making the nature of the race itself more for the honour of victory rather than trying to build up a CV of palmares to justify that 7 figure contract a cyclist would like, but then again that might be an imperfect solution in a time where it is hard to find sponsors.
BroDeal said:The CN article about Vino makes a point that he was recently training on Tenerife where Ferrari and Fuentes are known to work. I don't recall CN ever making that point in an article about Armstrong training on the island.
The relevant quote:
"More doping questions followed about why Vinokourov had recently been training in Tenerife, where disgraced sports doctors Eufemiano Fuentes and Michele Ferrari are alleged to work."
Now on to the Giro. Looks like Evans will be outclassed once again.![]()
luckyboy said:People don't seem to be bothered : /
luckyboy said:People don't seem to be bothered : /
ludwig said:Indeed, if we ever wanted cyclists to get serious about regulating themselves, equal pay for each cyclist would have to be a prerequisite.... But this is, sadly, very utopian.
-101dolophonic said:+100
So many hypocrites... they jump on Vino and give other riders a pass... double standard.
Vino rode a great race.
Stop deluding yourself, your rider is clean but everyone else is dirty.. yeah right.
Its mano a mano on the road... today Vino was the man.
dolophonic said:You seem to be really bothered. We heard you...
people love cycling,they love the sport. You don't love it any more than others.
BikeCentric said:First off, I've always liked Vino as he's a tough-as-nails Eastern bloc rider who reminds me of Dolph Lundgren in Rocky IV - "I vill break you." Since every one of the riders in arguably the top 50 of LBL is doped I might as well be happy that Vino gets the win.
However, I do think it's kind of funny (read: sad) that a guy can get busted for blood doping and then come right back and dope some more (and win). I mean lets be real: Vino is obviously doped up. He was on dope before, busted for it, and now he's as strong if not stronger than he was before. Therefore he's still on dope. Very simple. At that level you don't get better clean than you were on dope, especially after a suspension.
Therefore it seems pretty clear to me that the UCI is giving the tacit okay for riders to dope up as long as they don't flaunt their blood parameters on the bio-passport. The sport is really skating on thin ice with his tactic. I don't see how the higher-ups can possibly be so stupid as to think another big scandal ala Festina or Puerto is NOT going to hit the sport with this approach. And once again the sport will take a big hit. It continues to get hit hard and then get back up from the mat so I make no predictions of doom for the sport but there is simply no question that many sponsors will stay away from this dirty sport.
The bigger question is how do we encourage kids to pursue their dreams in this sport when we know the top level is dirty as Hell? I know I'll be telling my kid if I have one: "by all means race amateur, it's a great sport and can be good for you, but don't even think about about going pro."
exactlyluckyboy said:I think there's a good case for life-bans for doping now tbh. Why bother banning people at all if they're just going to come back at the same level?
dolophonic said:Luckyboy, do me a favor, keep your personal slights to yourself.
what because he doesnt agree with you...........aww poor diddumsdolophonic said:Luckyboy, do me a favor, keep your personal slights to yourself.
luckyboy said:Isn't the average age of an NFL player 52?
luckyboy said:Keep yours to yourself then. I don't appreciate being told that I love cycling less than other fans.
craig1985 said:Jerry Rice was either 44 or 45 when he retired.