simo1733 said:How does Leinders happen to fall within USADA Juristiction?
According to anti doping Denmark, USADA run the case, since they where the first to find a "crime" committed by Leinders. I guess that's the best answer I can give.
simo1733 said:How does Leinders happen to fall within USADA Juristiction?
it can actually be both. it is a false dichotomy to assert it is opposite ends of a spectrum. it is not.MarkvW said:Now who is changing the goalposts? This is not about Lance's punishment. I fully agree that his punishment is appropriate. My problem with your argument is that you view Lance as an aberration, while I view him as a direct (albeit extreme) descendant of Eddy Merckx.
blackcat said:it can actually be both. it is a false dichotomy to assert it is opposite ends of a spectrum. it is not.
42x16ss might be a definition of aberration. There will always be a personality type, that holds up one end of the spectrum (survivor fallacy). So Armstrong's psychology, off the bell curve, but he needed a culture and sport like cycling, and the echo chamber that was the peloton, to underwrite, endorse, and encourage said behaviour, and act as an accessory to the crime. So he just inherited the mantle of Le Patron from Hinault, and Merckx , and with his personal psychology, it was a time bomb.
cycling needed Armstrong.
Armstrong needed cycling.
they were peas in a pod and they found their playmate conspirator abettor spouse.
Kik and Anna Hansen were never a match to cycling, the peloton, and the UCI. how could they possibly compete. oh, and Yellow Rose, Austin's premier and foremost gentlemen's club or establishment.
its more about Lance off the bike.MarkvW said:Your argument doesn't hold water. You can't make Lance unique without whitewashing the professional peloton.
facetious MArk. have a laff.MarkvW said:I agree with everything except the last paragraph. I don't know much at all about Armstrong's personal life (and don't want to).
neineinei said:Leipheimer giving evedence against Leinders in the US Postal case is used as reason for the SOL of this case... USADA was very early involved when Rasmussen started talking. Clearly neither UCI nor the Belgians were going to do anything, but what about the Dutch?
The Belgians have taken interest in Boogerd. But what about Menchov? USADA has several statements about him now, and then there is Padova too. No reason to let him get away with two years and 3 laughable TdF disqualifications.
simo1733 said:How does Leinders happen to fall within USADA Juristiction?
King Boonen said:Good to see him banned, does not look good for Sky.
I've long said that accusing Kerrison of implementing doping at Sky was fairly far-fetched. He worked at British Swimming in a period when they received a huge amount of funding and couldn't even buy a medal. If Sky are running a team doping program then Kerrison has always been more likely to be the decoy while Leinders was the brains.
MarkvW said:I cannot see how Sky could be unaware. If they're that ignorant of what goes on in the sport, then they are too ignorant to implement an honest and successful "marginal gains" strategy.
King Boonen said:Not sure why you quoted me?
Unaware of what? Leinders history? Supposed doping in their team? Doping in general?
All of the above?
I've not commented on Sky being unaware of anything, I just said if they were doping then Kerrison was a misdirection and wasn't brought in to dope people as many have suggested in the past.
MarkvW said:I intended no criticism. I agree with you. Sorry.
King Boonen said:I didn't think you were criticising
I just wasn't sure what you meant and as you quoted me I thought it better to check first rather than reply based on assumption, no worries.
I do think there is no way Sky could claim not to know about his past, it's ridiculous to say they don't. They wouldn't have known the full extent, but they would have known exactly who he worked for and the accusations floating around.
listen to this suondcloud.King Boonen said:I do think there is no way Sky could claim not to know about his past, it's ridiculous to say they don't. They wouldn't have known the full extent, but they would have known exactly who he worked for and the accusations floating around.
These are the same two hosts that barely mention Rabobank because they are sponsored by Rabobank?sniper said:listen to this suondcloud.
the two hosts taking the **** out of brailsford/sky for their claim not to have known who leinders was.
https://soundcloud.com/secondcaptains-it-com/cheating-special-leinders-team-sky-russia-belichick
Parker said:These are the same two hosts that barely mention Rabobank because they are sponsored by Rabobank?
Parker said:These are the same two hosts that barely mention Rabobank because they are sponsored by Rabobank?
That is crazy, my friend, everybody knewsniper said:by the way, it's not even clear yet whether the guy is Dutch or Belgian, some media calling him Belgian other Dutch. Crazy.
Let's hope Brailsford's investigation will get to the bottom of this![]()
sniper said:who cares about rabobank?
MarkvW said:Rabo is interesting to me because it was a prominent sponsor waking up and realizing "Hey, this sport is hurting our brand, not helping it." The team also appeared to be organized in its approach to doping--contrary to the lies the 'sport' tried to palm off on us post-Festina.
King Boonen said:Good to see him banned, does not look good for Sky.
I've long said that accusing Kerrison of implementing doping at Sky was fairly far-fetched. He worked at British Swimming in a period when they received a huge amount of funding and couldn't even buy a medal. If Sky are running a team doping program then Kerrison has always been more likely to be the decoy while Leinders was the brains.
aggregation of marginal gains.MarkvW said:I cannot see how Sky could be unaware. If they're that ignorant of what goes on in the sport, then they are too ignorant to implement an honest and successful "marginal gains" strategy.
Not true, my friend.blackcat said:kerrison brought the marginal gains.
remember in LAnce's comeback, he had hired a triathlon coach, an Australian !!! an Australian triathlon coach who K Street and Burson Marstellar Orwelled into a euphemism weasel word "movement specialist".
Armstrong had a movement specialist. And i dont think they were talking bowel movement, just sayin, and Sky had a swimming coach.
Was there a rowing coach anywhere? Kerrison coached swimming in Brisbane no? And at some point in time he had some coaching relationship to Ian Thorpe no?
all so incestuous this doping palava. Instead of Schepisi directing 7 degrees of Separation with Will Smith, he could have directed 3 degrees of Separation with Hein Verbruggen and doping.