Yeah if it's dry it's just not that selective.
For 270 kms in modern day cycling? Yeah, right.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Yeah if it's dry it's just not that selective.
My view of modern pro cyclists is that they do not easily drop on a hill that's 15m highFor 270 kms in modern day cycling? Yeah, right.
My view of modern pro cyclists is that they do not easily drop on a hill that's 15m high
Remco repeat?Serge Pauwels went on a recon of the parcours last week with Van Aert and Kopecky.
He said it's special and looks more like an asphalted CX-parcours. It's ten times worse than Leuven in terms of turns and corners. Also there's a very narrow passage through a city park.
He expects it to be chaotic and very difficult to organise a chase in the peloton once a group/rider can get a gap. If it turns out to be a sprint, he doesn't expect more than 30 riders.
Leuven famously had hills harder than 300m at 6%, which is what caused the big splits in the first place.Yeah, yeah, and Leuven would be a bunch sprint...
This ramp features on the circuit:Does anyone have a profile of the circuit? It's really hard to tell from the overall profile how tough the race will be. But if some of those bumps are actually steep it might not be too easy.
They make a left-hand turn right at the bottom of it.If thats right after a turn, its selective, otherwise not so much
That was in the rain.It's a harder version of the circuit we saw in the 2018 Euros. Less than 5 riders will be in the first group to cross the line.
Here's the detailed profile of the Worlds circuit I mentioned I was working on yesterday.
Ordnance Survey publishes really detailed 1:2500 maps which you unfortunately have to pay for, however the copyright expires after 50 years and so the postwar 1:2500 map is publicly available here. The street grid in the parts of the city the race goes through has barely changed since (the longest stretch of new road is ~250 metres of the descent of University Avenue), so almost all of the profile is based on that map. Unfortunately, there is no elevation data for pedestrian paths through parks, which is used in the run-in to Sunlight Way and on the climb to Lord Roberts Monument, so I basically only have the elevation of the start and end points of those bits. Still, I think this is as accurate and detailed a profile as you can make without paying for newer maps (or measuring it yourself, but I'm not exactly close to Glasgow). Especially useful given that Google's elevation data is all over the place in Glasgow city centre (and Streetview confirms this).
Okay that's harder than I thought. Still 12% for 170m isn't much but it's a loooot of reps. The easier hills shouldn't do that much cause I presume they'll mostly be taken easy until the final lap or 2.Here's the detailed profile of the Worlds circuit I mentioned I was working on yesterday.
Ordnance Survey publishes really detailed 1:2500 maps which you unfortunately have to pay for, however the copyright expires after 50 years and so the postwar 1:2500 map is publicly available here. The street grid in the parts of the city the race goes through has barely changed since (the longest stretch of new road is ~250 metres of the descent of University Avenue), so almost all of the profile is based on that map. Unfortunately, there is no elevation data for pedestrian paths through parks, which is used in the run-in to Sunlight Way and on the climb to Lord Roberts Monument, so I basically only have the elevation of the start and end points of those bits. Still, I think this is as accurate and detailed a profile as you can make without paying for newer maps (or measuring it yourself, but I'm not exactly close to Glasgow). Especially useful given that Google's elevation data is all over the place in Glasgow city centre (and Streetview confirms this).
I think the weather had a bigger impact on that race.We saw in Yorkshire the significance of the difference between flat and undulating terrain.
'A trans person said they're fed up with trans people being demonised & used as a political football, I should be allowed to tell them they're wrong blah blah blah!'Meanwhile.. I probably get kicked out or sacked or something else but it's very disappointing editorial line in cyclingnews that all transgender related news are 'comment section is 'now ' closed by default. Even moreso now as Phillippa York writes cycling needs transgender education, as an announcement, like it's given fyi. When it's not a fact but opinion. And readers can't give their response for that. Why publish this type of news at all, if open discussion is not possible. When typically it's possible. It's just too obvious ideology then. We're open for discussion. Of right things.... End of rant and I'm not trying to open up long long long discussion about right or wrong right here and right now. I'm here for cycling as a sport.
I’m sure it broke some “pothole patching and shovel-wielding” union’s rules.As a little aside from the ongoing Giro in Italy, the state of the roads in Italy, compared to say Switzerland is notable. Now the locals are filling in potholes themselves and .... getting fined for it! https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/may/15/italy-man-fined-for-filling-in-pothole
"Claudio Trenta was so frustrated by the local council’s failure to repair the 30cm pothole on a pedestrian crossing in Barlassina, a small town in Lombardy, that the 72-year-old decided to take action himself by filling it with cold bitumen. This led to a fine of €882 (£767) ..."
The added joke is the authorities have told him to return the pothole to it's original state!I’m sure it broke some “pothole patching and shovel-wielding” union’s rules.
Ha-ha. Italian bureaucracy at its bestThe added joke is the authorities have told him to return the pothole to its original state!