A happy 37th birthday to the current Man in Pink and one of the few remnants of the grand experiment that was Team Sky. Ineos must be glad he did n't move on elsewhere when Bernal was the bright young thing for the future.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Last time I looked Carthy isn't winning multiple Grand Tours?Carthy's podium in the Vuelta wasn't met with "= bad doping".
I also don't think the Yates brothers have faced harsher criticism in the clinic than what you could expect for a non-Brit.
So why is there a disproportionate bias to talking doping when a British rider wins? I mean culturally, historically and statistically the real violations say otherwise?Ah, yes. Pointing out the Giiii circus show is just because of nationalism. Sometimes I even miss the Dawg days for the level of mental gymnastics.
All the while singing how they were only winning cause cycling is cleanz nowBecause the three most ridiculous transformations of the century from gruppetto rider to Tour winner were all Brits.
All the while singing how they were only winning cause cycling is cleanz now
So why is there a disproportionate bias to talking doping when a British rider wins? I mean culturally, historically and statistically the real violations say otherwise?
He also won a Grand Tour where he got beaten by a guy who didn't test positive.also, lol, the most successful British rider to ever live LITERALLY tested positive at a grand tour that he won. so statistically the real violations say...we're right.
They did El Bisonte dirty!He also won a Grand Tour where he got beaten by a guy who didn't test positive.
You're gonna have to accept the entire world hates the British.So why is there a disproportionate bias to talking doping when a British rider wins? I mean culturally, historically and statistically the real violations say otherwise?
PR winner next season, whats OCCCCCCURING?
Signing this.Looking at him dropping the almost 15kg lighter Dunbar on the super steep stuff is a bit comical. I think many people seem to give Thomas a pass because unlike Froome or Wiggins he comes off as actually likable and seems to be well liked by many riders (also by those outside the anglosphere).
Let me check if we could have predicted this based on his preseason?Arensman gonna end up 5th, maybe even 4th on GC
Let me check if we could have predicted this based on his preseason?
Yes, we should have known because he was completely dogshit all season
Unreal.
I'm a bit speechless tbh.
I mean forget all the reactions + overreactions when Vinge or Pog do something crazy, this is right up there with the wildest stuff.
There isn't. What exists is a bigger scrutiny eyed through transformations that occur late in the career of a rider. The fact GB had Sir TUE, Dawg and Giiiiii in quick succession didn't translate into the same level of scrutiny towards TGH who is also pretty sus but actually showed some climbing talent early in his career, for example. Neither would the same level of outrage ensue if Little Pidcock started to compete for GT wins. On the other hand, Horner was properly ridiculed with his Vuelta win. There are several examples like this that nullify the hilarious narrative about anti-British bias.So why is there a disproportionate bias to talking doping when a British rider wins? I mean culturally, historically and statistically the real violations say otherwise?
Let me check if we could have predicted this based on his preseason?
Yes, we should have known because he was completely dogshit all season