The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Stage 1 and 2 in Paris-Nice were better than most mountain stages.Kafviar said:Seriously, what is even the point of sprint stages..?
Kafviar said:Seriously, what is even the point of sprint stages..?
WheelofGear said:Stage 1 and 2 in Paris-Nice were better than most mountain stages.Kafviar said:Seriously, what is even the point of sprint stages..?
Kafviar said:Seriously, what is even the point of sprint stages..?
Each of the sprint stages have been better than the Etna stage imo.Kafviar said:Seriously, what is even the point of sprint stages..?
Race organisors want to attract the best field possible and then they have to make flat stages to attract the sprinters.Gigs_98 said:What I don't get is why race organizers make stages boring on purpose. I get that you can't make mountain stages every day and I get that there should be many different kinds of stages but why make this stage pan flat instead of using a little climb close to the finish to at least give attackers a chance. Stages like todays exist for the sole purpose of giving sprinters a chance to win and not to entertain fans of the sport
Have you ever contemplated that some might consider mass sprints entertaining? I mean, you don't like it, that's ok, but let those others have a bit fun. There are stages for everyone.Gigs_98 said:What I don't get is why race organizers make stages boring on purpose. I get that you can't make mountain stages every day and I get that there should be many different kinds of stages but why make this stage pan flat instead of using a little climb close to the finish to at least give attackers a chance. Stages like todays exist for the sole purpose of giving sprinters a chance to win and not to entertain fans of the sport
Yeah, as I wrote, they exist for the sole purpose of giving sprinters a chance, or said differently to attract the best sprinters possible. But actually thats the fascinating thing. This argument only works because there seems to be an agreement that sprinters are an important part of cycling. Every freakin 2nd stage in this years tdf will be as interesting as todays giro stage, only because it's in the mind of cycling fans and race organizers that sprint stages are an important part of the race. There will be a finish in Liege, that city where the worlds most famous hilly classic finishes, but still the stage will be flat because race organizers thought you can't give pure sprinters no chance to win a stage before stage 4.Hugo Koblet said:Race organisors want to attract the best field possible and then they have to make flat stages to attract the sprinters.Gigs_98 said:What I don't get is why race organizers make stages boring on purpose. I get that you can't make mountain stages every day and I get that there should be many different kinds of stages but why make this stage pan flat instead of using a little climb close to the finish to at least give attackers a chance. Stages like todays exist for the sole purpose of giving sprinters a chance to win and not to entertain fans of the sport
So you prefer to watch a completely flat stage where absolutely nothing happens before the last 500 meters, over a stage with some hills close to the finish, which still make a sprint possible but make it less controlled and give attackers a chance?starlord said:Have you ever contemplated that some might consider mass sprints entertaining? I mean, you don't like it, that's ok, but let those others have a bit fun. There are stages for everyone.Gigs_98 said:What I don't get is why race organizers make stages boring on purpose. I get that you can't make mountain stages every day and I get that there should be many different kinds of stages but why make this stage pan flat instead of using a little climb close to the finish to at least give attackers a chance. Stages like todays exist for the sole purpose of giving sprinters a chance to win and not to entertain fans of the sport
Gigs_98 said:So you prefer to watch a completely flat stage where absolutely nothing happens before the last 500 meters, over a stage with some hills close to the finish, which still make a sprint possible but make it less controlled and give attackers a chance?starlord said:Have you ever contemplated that some might consider mass sprints entertaining? I mean, you don't like it, that's ok, but let those others have a bit fun. There are stages for everyone.Gigs_98 said:What I don't get is why race organizers make stages boring on purpose. I get that you can't make mountain stages every day and I get that there should be many different kinds of stages but why make this stage pan flat instead of using a little climb close to the finish to at least give attackers a chance. Stages like todays exist for the sole purpose of giving sprinters a chance to win and not to entertain fans of the sport
I certainly do not. But I know a few people (okay 2 exactly) who do, they love stages with mass sprint at the end of the day (and are disappointed in case break gets it). Yeah, it' strange (for us) but it kinda teaches you that people have different tastes. Live and let liveGigs_98 said:So you prefer to watch a completely flat stage where absolutely nothing happens before the last 500 meters, over a stage with some hills close to the finish, which still make a sprint possible but make it less controlled and give attackers a chance?starlord said:Have you ever contemplated that some might consider mass sprints entertaining? I mean, you don't like it, that's ok, but let those others have a bit fun. There are stages for everyone.Gigs_98 said:What I don't get is why race organizers make stages boring on purpose. I get that you can't make mountain stages every day and I get that there should be many different kinds of stages but why make this stage pan flat instead of using a little climb close to the finish to at least give attackers a chance. Stages like todays exist for the sole purpose of giving sprinters a chance to win and not to entertain fans of the sport
So. You'd rather watch 150 kilometers, where nothing happens just for the joy of watching the exciting last kilometer, than watch a race with attacks 30-40 kilometers from the finish? That's weird, but ok.Vroome.exe said:Gigs_98 said:So you prefer to watch a completely flat stage where absolutely nothing happens before the last 500 meters, over a stage with some hills close to the finish, which still make a sprint possible but make it less controlled and give attackers a chance?starlord said:Have you ever contemplated that some might consider mass sprints entertaining? I mean, you don't like it, that's ok, but let those others have a bit fun. There are stages for everyone.Gigs_98 said:What I don't get is why race organizers make stages boring on purpose. I get that you can't make mountain stages every day and I get that there should be many different kinds of stages but why make this stage pan flat instead of using a little climb close to the finish to at least give attackers a chance. Stages like todays exist for the sole purpose of giving sprinters a chance to win and not to entertain fans of the sport
I personally don't like when an attacker wins on sprinters stage, there's absolutely no tension seeing one or two riders fight it out in slo-mo sprint.
I dont think you can have an exciting last 40km full of attacks and still have a sprinter win it. There must be some stages for sprinters like this one.Cance > TheRest said:So. You'd rather watch 150 kilometers, where nothing happens just for the joy of watching the exciting last kilometer, than watch a race with attacks 30-40 kilometers from the finish? That's weird, but ok.Vroome.exe said:Gigs_98 said:So you prefer to watch a completely flat stage where absolutely nothing happens before the last 500 meters, over a stage with some hills close to the finish, which still make a sprint possible but make it less controlled and give attackers a chance?starlord said:Have you ever contemplated that some might consider mass sprints entertaining? I mean, you don't like it, that's ok, but let those others have a bit fun. There are stages for everyone.Gigs_98 said:What I don't get is why race organizers make stages boring on purpose. I get that you can't make mountain stages every day and I get that there should be many different kinds of stages but why make this stage pan flat instead of using a little climb close to the finish to at least give attackers a chance. Stages like todays exist for the sole purpose of giving sprinters a chance to win and not to entertain fans of the sport
I personally don't like when an attacker wins on sprinters stage, there's absolutely no tension seeing one or two riders fight it out in slo-mo sprint.
Pozzovivo to gain more seconds on the peloton.Brullnux said:Crosswinds are there. Peloton seems calm and doesn't really care yet.
I've said this in another threat, you don't have to watch before the last couple of k. Just accept it as a fact that some stages provide 3 hours of entertainment, some 1 hour, some 30 minutes, and some 10.Gigs_98 said:So you prefer to watch a completely flat stage where absolutely nothing happens before the last 500 meters, over a stage with some hills close to the finish, which still make a sprint possible but make it less controlled and give attackers a chance?starlord said:Have you ever contemplated that some might consider mass sprints entertaining? I mean, you don't like it, that's ok, but let those others have a bit fun. There are stages for everyone.Gigs_98 said:What I don't get is why race organizers make stages boring on purpose. I get that you can't make mountain stages every day and I get that there should be many different kinds of stages but why make this stage pan flat instead of using a little climb close to the finish to at least give attackers a chance. Stages like todays exist for the sole purpose of giving sprinters a chance to win and not to entertain fans of the sport
They're also for the fans who are actually roadside. It gives some of the 130,000 people of Alessandria and Tortona a chance to watch the race as they get of work (as well as a convient friday afternoon destination for fans out of Milan and Turin [both about an hour away]), plus the travelling fans a day to stay in a beautiful town centre as the race finishes up, which can be a nice little break from camping all day up in some out of the way mountain.Kafviar said:Seriously, what is even the point of sprint stages..?