The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
I agree with that part. And I don't think he will get the better of Kittel (or a healthy Cavendish) on a straight run in.Alexandre B. said:As I said, Gaviria is a very good sprinter. But calling him "best sprinter in the world" is nonsense (in my opinion) because he still has to prove it on the biggest stage, when you expect top sprinters to battle it out.
It kind of is nonsense. It would be like calling Degenkolb the best sprinter in the world on the back of the 2014 Vuelta. When in fact, like Gaviria, he's clearly not even the best sprinter in his own team.carton said:I agree with that part. And I don't think he can beat Kittel (or a healthy Cavendish) on a straight run in.Alexandre B. said:As I said, Gaviria is a very good sprinter. But calling him "best sprinter in the world" is nonsense (in my opinion) because he still has to prove it on the biggest stage, when you expect top sprinters to battle it out.
But by the same token Kittel hasn't proven to be the best the Tour in the last couple of years. I mean, I think he's clearly tops at the moment with Cavendish out, but I base that on his other performances, no on his Tours. So on that basis it's not nonsense to call Gaviria the best sprinter in the world at the moment. I don't agree, but it's not nonsense.
I'm not saying he is. But an argument can be made. Assume a sprint stage in a week, all of the hitters are there (bar Cav, who is on the sidelines ATM), outside of Kittel, who are you taking? Now, get Kittel back in there, say it's a lumpy finish, or twisty finish, who are you taking? It's not ludicrous to go with Gaviria in either case.DFA123 said:It kind of is nonsense. It would be like calling Degenkolb the best sprinter in the world on the back of the 2014 Vuelta. When in fact, like Gaviria, he's clearly not even the best sprinter in his own team.
It would be fun to see Sagan with a decent sprint train again, like he had occasionally in the Cannondale days. I think he's a faster bunch sprinter than he was then as well, so with a good lead out (Bennett as last man could be incredible), he would have a chance of challenging even Kittel at times imo.Zinoviev Letter said:I really didn't expect Bora to have the horsepower to have the dominant sprint train. There are some serious engines among the young rider's they've brought. Pity for them that Gaviria has the form to spoil their work. I wonder is this going to be a central part of their tactics for the rest of the season. Will Sagan and Bennett regularly get the full HTC treatment?
I think the 2014 Vuelta is a very good comparison. There you had the best second tier sprinters like Degenkolb, Bouhanni, Sagan, Matthews and a few outsiders like Boonen and Ciolek.carton said:I'm not saying he is. But an argument can be made. Assume a sprint stage in a week, all of the hitters are there (bar Cav, who is on the sidelines ATM), outside of Kittel, who are you taking? Now, get Kittel back in there, say it's a lumpy finish, or twisty finish, who are you taking? It's not ludicrous to go with Gaviria in either case.DFA123 said:It kind of is nonsense. It would be like calling Degenkolb the best sprinter in the world on the back of the 2014 Vuelta. When in fact, like Gaviria, he's clearly not even the best sprinter in his own team.
Also, this sprint field is a little better than 2014 Vuelta. And Bouhanni was right up there with Dege there.
Again, I won't say it, and I don't believe it, and it seems like a lot of unnecessary hype, but it's not insane to suggest it.
del1962 said:So who leaves the Giro tomorrow with Greipel?
Ewan and Bennett?
I think we're basically in agreement there.DFA123 said:He's been hugely impressive to win so many stages, but I think it's way too early to apply a wider context to his performances.
Yes, he has been in the top 8 on 6 stages--and he is the only rider to have been in the top 8 in all of them. He clearly knows how to maneuver in a GT sprint. The top end speed is still lacking to compete for a win, but this is nevertheless an excellent GT debut.Geraint Too Fast said:Tremendous consistency from Gibbons. Dimension Data have found a good one there.
You are right. Another example could be Bouhanni in the 2014 Giro. I don't think anyone seriously considered him the best sprinter in the world because of his three stage wins, and neither should people think that way about Gaviria. For what it was worth, it was probably his best sprint win ever today, better than Paris-Tours as well, which - to be fair - was a win more remniscent of Cancellara's win in Compiégne than a true sprint win.DFA123 said:I think the 2014 Vuelta is a very good comparison. There you had the best second tier sprinters like Degenkolb, Bouhanni, Sagan, Matthews and a few outsiders like Boonen and Ciolek.carton said:I'm not saying he is. But an argument can be made. Assume a sprint stage in a week, all of the hitters are there (bar Cav, who is on the sidelines ATM), outside of Kittel, who are you taking? Now, get Kittel back in there, say it's a lumpy finish, or twisty finish, who are you taking? It's not ludicrous to go with Gaviria in either case.DFA123 said:It kind of is nonsense. It would be like calling Degenkolb the best sprinter in the world on the back of the 2014 Vuelta. When in fact, like Gaviria, he's clearly not even the best sprinter in his own team.
Also, this sprint field is a little better than 2014 Vuelta. And Bouhanni was right up there with Dege there.
Again, I won't say it, and I don't believe it, and it seems like a lot of unnecessary hype, but it's not insane to suggest it.
Similarly at this Giro, you've got second tier sprinters like Bennett and Ewan, plus a load of pretty poor outsiders like Mareczko and Modolo. Griepel is the exception I guess, but his lead out really sucks without Sieberg and Henderson, to the extent that he's been out of contention before the sprint starts more often than not.
Gaviria really needs to be beating the best sprinters with their a-trains, before he can be considered in the same company imo. He's been hugely impressive to win so many stages, but I think it's way too early to apply a wider context to his performances.
Velolover2 said:Wanna bet on a top 15 for tomorrow? Quintana to win it but Dumoulin to get much closer.
Quintana
Dumoulin, 3'
Pinot, 15'
Yates
Mollema, 21'
Nibali, 34
Pozzovivo
Formolo
Jungels, 55'
Zakarin
Polanc
Amador
Kangert
Reichenbach, 1'32
Cataldo