More like Groves v Kooij?Groves v Pedersen ?
I'm hoping the peloton will be sufficiently informed and alert and will handle it like pros... I think it's mostly when they are ill informed and unaware of the upcoming dangers that they crash.
I think we need to stress-test this finish. What's the worst case scenario? After a day of no echelons, a full peloton hits the turn at warp speed and 170 riders go down and dnf. The lone survivor Fuglsang finishes, and struggles through the remaining stages and gets the Trofeo Senza Fine.Big fan of some cycling media finally picking up on how dangerous this finish is three weeks after I talked about it in the stage-by-stage analysis. The entire ecosystem is so broken - RCS should never have designed this finish, the UCI should never have approved it, and the riders/CPA should have complained (in the media if they had done so internally and RCS weren't listening) ages ago.
I think we need to stress-test this finish. What's the worst case scenario? After a day of no echelons, a full peloton hits the turn at warp speed and 170 riders go down and dnf. The lone survivor Fuglsang finishes, and struggles through the remaining stages and gets the Trofeo Senza Fine.
A win is a win.That sounds like a nightmare. Especially for Fuglsang who would no longer be able to chill in the Froometto.
A win is a win.
Working fine on Max here.Anyone else have buffering eurosport? :O
I get no nothing, I'm going crazy here!
Then it was probably my internet. After buffring for 10 minutes now it's workingWorking fine on Max here.
The problem is that the route into that corner is already kilometres of uninterrupted straight road.It's obvious that everyone with a word to say on the route design must have thought that a sprint at the end of a 2km long straight road is far more dangerous than that narrow silly corner.
Even the break need a break.No one wants to go in the break