Realistically Hansen has form for it. The end outcome is the best compromise possible, but we know that even if the temperature were five degrees more Hansen would have been pushing for the stage to start at Prato.That's hardly a good argument.
Realistically Hansen has form for it. The end outcome is the best compromise possible, but we know that even if the temperature were five degrees more Hansen would have been pushing for the stage to start at Prato.That's hardly a good argument.
Yeah, you can't demand that the descent through snow and on potentially icy roads.I think the end decision is a fair one, the weather is a lot worse that forecast. Riding for 20km in the snow and then descending is a bit risky, too.
I also think hypothermia/loss of control of bikes becomes an issue when the entire first ~three hours of the stage are below freezing. If it had just been Umbrail from 2200m to Prato that had this weather it's a much more minor health concern.Yeah, you can't demand that the descent through snow and on potentially icy roads.
The conditions are good, they can race there.![]()
Apparently from the pass.
I don't like Blythe always as a commentator, but he's been in the Giro thrice and finished once and done Galibiers and Bardonecchias aso in race circumstances..What a farce
Can they make Blythe ride the Umbrail pass at least? Either him alone or the riders. I would be quite pleased with that arrangement.
Part of me thinks it's because they fear that nobody will host Giro stages if they have strict contrats that take everything into consideration.I think like you said a few days ago, they allocate risks and responsibilities so badly.
Explain the significance ?LMAO they're really riding through Munt la Schera?
Guess I'm a massive idiot, would've never thought that would happen, was just about to post why not lol
Maybe is more safe doing a descent on this conditions than doing descents like a mad man, like they usually do. On that situations they are not concerned.It should be decided yesterday that they start from the valley. Now it's a shitshow. Descending in these conditions is out of question. Dangerous for everyone involved, not only riders but also motorbikes etc.
guys this is the webcam on Foscagno...it is clearly not safe for the riders, but also for the cars (they do not have winter tires, probably they have 4-season tires or even summer tires)
![]()
You don't seem to care much for the riders.The decision now, given the likely weather conditions, is fine.
If this was the implementation of the plan from yesterday (which indeed did included this as an option) without interference by the anti-cycling union, but solely the decision of the UCI Commissaire and RCS, I would support it 100 %.
This is neither here nor there but what's with teams coming thoroughly unprepared and then expecting (nay, demanding) to be bailed out. Don't they have snow chains? It's kinda like when riders refuse to wear their stupendously expensive high-tech winter gear but rather choose to race wearing nothing but a thong and then they're like "ugh it's a bit chilly this is inhumane"guys this is the webcam on Foscagno...it is clearly not safe for the riders, but also for the cars (they do not have winter tires, probably they have 4-season tires or even summer tires)
Agreed, but the riders already wanted to cancel the climbs yesterday when the forecasts showed raceable conditions.That's hardly a good argument.
I agree, those conditions don't look good enough to do the full stage to me either.The decision now, given the likely weather conditions, is fine.
If this was the implementation of the plan from yesterday (which indeed did included this as an option) without interference by the anti-cycling union, but solely the decision of the UCI Commissaire and RCS, I would support it 100 %.
Possibly, but we have very few attempts at the double anyway (one every 4-5 years), so doesn't change much in the grand scheme of things.Wouldn't this make it near impossible for anyone to do the Giro/Tour double, though?
I doubt ASO would be on board with it.Swapping the Vuelta and Giro would be better. The weather in Spain is typically better in May and it's less of a high mountain race. The risks of extreme heat during the Vuelta are also minimized.
Pordoi, Fedaia, Gran San Bernardo, Asti...We have multiple precedents for that kind of behavior, so it's not far fetched to assume that.
I care as much as riders do for the fans.You don't seem to care much for the riders.