Pasqualon's ability to get in pointless breakways has been quite impressiveOnly Milan has really impressed among the Bahrain riders.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Pasqualon's ability to get in pointless breakways has been quite impressiveOnly Milan has really impressed among the Bahrain riders.
IMO Thomas is looking stronger now then he was last year at TDFJustincrediblescary to think that Thomas's shape in this Giro was the one that granted him a 3rd place in the Tour where he was 7m22s behind Vingo.
There's a GreenEdge thread.Is there really no Jayco thread?
Do we know if he has been sick or something? He showed good form in the Tour of the Alpes and in Liège.Buitrago has been quite disappointing compared to last giro
100%. The field has been decimated. It's a snoozer.It probably says something about this Giro that several riders who aren't going for GC are in the top ten.
I really don’t think so. Monte Lussari can put 1 minute gaps even between the top 3 if you ask me. If it was tomorrow with the current gaps between the top 3 I wouldn’t know where to put my moneyI think most are overestimating it
yeah, it's already been said in the press his numbers are better.IMO Thomas is looking stronger now then he was last year at TDF
Climbing numbers have careened down an absolute cliff this Giroyeah, it's already been said in the press his numbers are better.
Arensman almost as good as Kuss today, only 8 seconds off.By the way look at where De Plus and Arensman finished.
Total fake pace by Ineos.
He has a ways to go to reach HOF Ninjas Meintjes and Zubeldia............sometimes you would see the Devil more on the side of the road than you would see Zubeldia for three whole weeks..........Kämna is turning into prime Zubeldia/Meintjes. Not a single stage top 10. Always sitting at the back of the group. Among the first GC guys to be dropped. Pacing himself and limiting the damage. Gaining time on other GC guys that tried to follow the best and exploded.
Kuss just walks it in in the final kms.Arensman almost as good as Kuss today, only 8 seconds off.
He strangled the race and intimidated everyone else from attacking. Sad.I look to forward to the analysis of how Kuss destroyed the race today and rode like an amateur.
Yes, I think its wrong, and I think its very depressing to think that way about cycling. Imagine if worst case scenario would be our expectation going into watching every race. I definitely wouldnt want to live in that world since the magic about cycling, to me, is a lot about fantasizing and expecting epic stuff. Whats gonna happen, is it gonna blow up on Giau? Maybe. But the thought sticks around enough to the point of me absolutely having to tune in at that point at the latest, and If I wasn't working, you better believe I'd watch exactly this stage in close to its full duration. If I thought nothing would happen before, why would I bother watching?Do you think it's wrong?
None of the three strongest are in a desperate situation nor strong enough to seal the deal. They have the strongest teams by far and will control the race, ensuring a solid pace on Giau and Tre Croce. They share the same winning path: be strong enough on Tre Cime and Lussari.
Yes, I think its wrong, and I think its very depressing to think that way about cycling. Imagine if worst case scenario would be our expectation going into watching every race. I definitely wouldnt want to live in that world since the magic about cycling, to me, is a lot about fantasizing and expecting epic stuff. Whats gonna happen, is it gonna blow up on Giau? Maybe. But the thought sticks around enough to the point of me absolutely having to tune in at that point at the latest, and If I wasn't working, you better believe I'd watch exactly this stage in close to its full duration. If I thought nothing would happen before, why would I bother watching?
Thats why flat stages are a lot worse than mountain stages, even if nothing really happens. At least you have certain expectations beforehand, you are excited and thinks to yourself what might happen, where as a flat, certain sprint stage is straight up unwatchable for me unless its TdF. Same with hillyish stages - what break will go, will the harder sprinters try to gap the fastmen, is the last hill enough to shred it, will Wout attack etc. You have all these possible scenarios, and they are quite important in order for me to get excited about a race and want to watch it.
So it's not that you find it an inaccurate prediction of what will unfold, but that it's demotivating to you?Yes, I think its wrong, and I think its very depressing to think that way about cycling. Imagine if worst case scenario would be our expectation going into watching every race. I definitely wouldnt want to live in that world since the magic about cycling, to me, is a lot about fantasizing and expecting epic stuff. Whats gonna happen, is it gonna blow up on Giau? Maybe. But the thought sticks around enough to the point of me absolutely having to tune in at that point at the latest, and If I wasn't working, you better believe I'd watch exactly this stage in close to its full duration. If I thought nothing would happen before, why would I bother watching?
Thats why flat stages are a lot worse than mountain stages, even if nothing really happens. At least you have certain expectations beforehand, you are excited and thinks to yourself what might happen, where as a flat, certain sprint stage is straight up unwatchable for me unless its TdF. Same with hillyish stages - what break will go, will the harder sprinters try to gap the fastmen, is the last hill enough to shred it, will Wout attack etc. You have all these possible scenarios, and they are quite important in order for me to get excited about a race and want to watch it.
Almeida nor Thomas have ever done anything as imaginative as attacking Giau. Roglic has been part of a thing like that but any scenario where Giau attack works involves him having the legs to win on Tre Cime anyway.Yes, I think its wrong, and I think its very depressing to think that way about cycling. Imagine if worst case scenario would be our expectation going into watching every race. I definitely wouldnt want to live in that world since the magic about cycling, to me, is a lot about fantasizing and expecting epic stuff. Whats gonna happen, is it gonna blow up on Giau? Maybe. But the thought sticks around enough to the point of me absolutely having to tune in at that point at the latest, and If I wasn't working, you better believe I'd watch exactly this stage in close to its full duration. If I thought nothing would happen before, why would I bother watching?
Thats why flat stages are a lot worse than mountain stages, even if nothing really happens. At least you have certain expectations beforehand, you are excited and thinks to yourself what might happen, where as a flat, certain sprint stage is straight up unwatchable for me unless its TdF. Same with hillyish stages - what break will go, will the harder sprinters try to gap the fastmen, is the last hill enough to shred it, will Wout attack etc. You have all these possible scenarios, and they are quite important in order for me to get excited about a race and want to watch it.
After 11 clicks on the official giro page I can tell you all that they also don’t have more resulta than the 39 first finishers.Has Tudor been destroyed for their TT splits or what happened to the full results? Still only Top 39 up on PCS, can‘t be bothered to check the Giro websites.
Its demotivating, yes, and I also think its wrong. Thats what I literally wrote in my first sentence..So it's not that you find it an inaccurate prediction of what will unfold, but that it's demotivating to you?
How's that my problem? I'll watch the stage in full as well and I look forward to it.