- May 23, 2009
- 10,256
- 1,455
- 25,680
Please... explain howClimbing times don't necessarily mean a field is strong.
Please... explain howClimbing times don't necessarily mean a field is strong.
If you take Almedia and Kelderman out of the equation ...the riders behind are very close
and for all those complaining about the quality of the field
View: https://twitter.com/ammattipyoraily/status/1317843041915457537?s=20
And did everything happen the exact same this time as the last time over the rest of the stage?anyway only 1'30 off Pantani means they were going pretty fast so that weak field *** can get canned already
Over an entire GT they make nice comparisons, especially if tactics were somewhat similar, difference in climbing times are super large, and if climbs are climbed frequently. If an entire field is faster or slower due to external circumstances it's hardly an indication of the quality of the field.And did everything happen the exact same this time as the last time over the rest of the stage?
Climbing times are poor as a comparison as this year or one of the others the rider could have been ridden into the ground before the climb
There are other variables: wind speed and direction, difficulty of the rest of the stage, earlier or later in the race. Also, the 2017 field was mediocre in general and poor on the day with the entire podium cracking.Please... explain how
true, but in the end you can only compare the riders that raced today, there is no way to ever gauge their absolute "quality" (whatever that even means)Over an entire GT they make nice comparisons, especially if tactics were somewhat similar, difference in climbing times are super large, and if climbs are climbed frequently. If an entire field is faster or slower due to external circumstances it's hardly an indication of the quality of the field.
With young guys, you can't really say it now, but you can probably make a better assessment down the road.true, but in the end you can only compare the riders that raced today, there is no way to ever gauge their absolute "quality" (whatever that even means)
And he went deeply into red. Same as the rest from the front. 2017 Giro was really different, it was in 3rd week with a hard mountain stage coming and the deciding TT after already some hard mountains, here a rest day is coming. The fatigue was there comparing to this Giro where 2nd week was lame in terms of difficulty and peloton didn't ride that hard. Climbing time doesn't mean much unless it's the same context. Otherwise you are just cherry picking.well almeida did 6.3 w/kg in the final 3kg alone and he was losing time
You are not going to convince me the quality was poor etc
Roglic was at the Giro last year, he did pretty much what he did at the tdf this year: follow wheels and get worse by the day.Nobody can really be convincing themselves that Kelderman vs Geoghegan Hart vs Almeida and some past-it GC guys is not a weak GC field lol.
So they were a minute slower than Pantani? You can put Pogacar, Roglic, Bernal here and they would break the record like they did on Peyresourde and Grand Colombier..
Anyway there's so much that goes into a time on a climb than just minutes and seconds, everyone knows that.
Are we talking about the same Roglic that finished 2nd, 2nd and 1st of the GC contender on the final 3 mountain stages? Including dropping the guy who would go poggers in the ITT on him?Roglic was at the Giro last year, he did pretty much what he did at the tdf this year: follow wheels and get worse by the day.
the only embarrassment is your comment
Climbing times today were faster than Pinot in 2017
People on here moan and undermine races becasue the narrative doesn t live up to their limited world view of cycling where only their decreed riders perfrom well or else its a shambles ....
This has to be the worst cherry picking I have ever seen in these forums, well done.Roglic was at the Giro last year, he did pretty much what he did at the tdf this year: follow wheels and get worse by the day.
yes, him. To me he still looked much worse than at the beginning. Regardless, he still followed wheels the whole time so we'll never know I guess.Are we talking about the same Roglic that finished 2nd, 2nd and 1st of the GC contender on the final 3 mountain stages? Including dropping the guy who would go poggers in the ITT on him?
Well, if one mentions Pogacar. Roglic and Bernal only one of them has done the Giro (iirc), so that was the only pickable option, wasn't it.This has to be the worst cherry picking I have ever seen in these forums, well done.
portugese voeckler is now my favorite rider. absolutely masterpiece of suffer face climbing by him today.I'm in awe of that ride from Almeida today, was certain he'd lost the jersey when he got dropped but he put in such a ballsy ride to fight for it, left everything on the road.
